Re: JDKs and control-flow enforcement

2023-06-27 Thread Kurt Miller
On Jun 27, 2023, at 10:48 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2023/06/27 08:18, Kurt Miller wrote: >> The CLA situation is no more. Greg and I have given up on getting >> BSD support merged upstream. It became clear that Oracle would not >> accept our code without a deep pocket corporation

Re: JDKs and control-flow enforcement

2023-06-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2023/06/27 08:18, Kurt Miller wrote: > The CLA situation is no more. Greg and I have given up on getting > BSD support merged upstream. It became clear that Oracle would not > accept our code without a deep pocket corporation backing the > effort. > > If you have tested diffs already baked,

Re: JDKs and control-flow enforcement

2023-06-27 Thread Kurt Miller
On Jun 27, 2023, at 5:41 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On amd64 with a processor with IBT support running a kernel with the > control-flow enforcement diff that's being tried in snapshots, the > various Java-compiled binaries fail. > > Some information pasted below and hs log attached; I

Re: JDKs and control-flow enforcement

2023-06-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
(ps originally reported on reddit e.g. https://reddit.leptons.xyz/r/openbsd/comments/14j1div/java_sigill_on_current/) On 2023/06/27 10:41, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On amd64 with a processor with IBT support running a kernel with the > control-flow enforcement diff that's being tried in

JDKs and control-flow enforcement

2023-06-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On amd64 with a processor with IBT support running a kernel with the control-flow enforcement diff that's being tried in snapshots, the various Java-compiled binaries fail. Some information pasted below and hs log attached; I didn't bother with the gdb backtrace as it just shows the signal