On 2019/09/03 12:59, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On 9/3/19 12:07 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2019/09/02 13:27, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> >> So here's my next iteration that also handles the upgrade.
> >> I stuck with MODGO_BINDIR, since the alternatives suggested weren't
> >> fully in
On 9/3/19 12:07 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019/09/02 13:27, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>> So here's my next iteration that also handles the upgrade.
>> I stuck with MODGO_BINDIR, since the alternatives suggested weren't
>> fully in favor and BINDIR is used by bsd.prog.mk
>>
>> OK in this
On 2019/09/02 13:27, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> So here's my next iteration that also handles the upgrade.
> I stuck with MODGO_BINDIR, since the alternatives suggested weren't
> fully in favor and BINDIR is used by bsd.prog.mk
>
> OK in this form?
You also need @conflict entries in the PLISTs
So here's my next iteration that also handles the upgrade.
I stuck with MODGO_BINDIR, since the alternatives suggested weren't
fully in favor and BINDIR is used by bsd.prog.mk
OK in this form?
martijn@
Index: lang/go/go.port.mk
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 09:00:28AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:10:01AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > On 8/24/19 8:56 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > > On 8/24/19 10:39 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >> On 2019/08/24 10:02, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > >>> On Sat,
On 8/26/19 9:00 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:10:01AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>> On 8/24/19 8:56 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>>> On 8/24/19 10:39 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2019/08/24 10:02, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 06:49:59AM
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:10:01AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On 8/24/19 8:56 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > On 8/24/19 10:39 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> On 2019/08/24 10:02, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 06:49:59AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:10:01AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On 8/24/19 8:56 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > On 8/24/19 10:39 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> On 2019/08/24 10:02, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 06:49:59AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On
On 8/24/19 8:56 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On 8/24/19 10:39 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2019/08/24 10:02, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 06:49:59AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
On 8/24/19 6:07 AM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Briefly discussed with gilles@.
On 8/24/19 10:39 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019/08/24 10:02, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 06:49:59AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>>> On 8/24/19 6:07 AM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
Briefly discussed with gilles@.
I would like to move the filters to
On 2019/08/24 10:02, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 06:49:59AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > On 8/24/19 6:07 AM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > > Briefly discussed with gilles@.
> > >
> > > I would like to move the filters to libexec/smtpd for two reasons.
> > > 1) filters
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 06:49:59AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On 8/24/19 6:07 AM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > Briefly discussed with gilles@.
> >
> > I would like to move the filters to libexec/smtpd for two reasons.
> > 1) filters are not commandline applications and I don't want them in
On 8/24/19 6:07 AM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Briefly discussed with gilles@.
>
> I would like to move the filters to libexec/smtpd for two reasons.
> 1) filters are not commandline applications and I don't want them in my
>$PATH.
> 2) opensmtpd-extras already used this location, so it's
Briefly discussed with gilles@.
I would like to move the filters to libexec/smtpd for two reasons.
1) filters are not commandline applications and I don't want them in my
$PATH.
2) opensmtpd-extras already used this location, so it's only consistent
to install there as well.
Diff below
14 matches
Mail list logo