Re: NEW: devel/cmark

2018-08-10 Thread Charlène
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:45:19 +0100 Stuart Henderson wrote: > It's already committed. > Sorry for the noise, i may have not noticed something has gone wrong during the initial tree fetch on this machine :( > On 2018/08/10 15:19, Charlène wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 20:34:36 +0200 > > Jan

Re: NEW: devel/cmark

2018-08-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
It's already committed. On 2018/08/10 15:19, Charlène wrote: > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 20:34:36 +0200 > Jan Klemkow wrote: > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 06:31:53PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > On Thu Aug 02, 2018 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote: > > > > Hi Rafael, >

Re: NEW: devel/cmark

2018-08-10 Thread Charlène
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 20:34:36 +0200 Jan Klemkow wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 06:31:53PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > On Thu Aug 02, 2018 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote: > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > > > I also worked on an cmark port. I took your tar ball and fixed > >

Re: NEW: devel/cmark

2018-08-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/08/02 20:34, Jan Klemkow wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 06:31:53PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > On Thu Aug 02, 2018 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote: > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > > > I also worked on an cmark port. I took your tar ball and fixed all > > >

Re: NEW: devel/cmark

2018-08-02 Thread Jan Klemkow
Hi Rafael, On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 06:31:53PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Thu Aug 02, 2018 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > > > I also worked on an cmark port. I took your tar ball and fixed all > > comments Stuart pointed out. Just, the MAINTAINER field is

Re: NEW: devel/cmark

2018-08-02 Thread Jan Klemkow
Hi Rafael, I also worked on an cmark port. I took your tar ball and fixed all comments Stuart pointed out. Just, the MAINTAINER field is still unset, But, a portscheck run does not require this field. I replaced the manual DISTFILE and MASTER_SITE handling by the GH_* variables, moved it to

Re: NEW: devel/cmark

2018-08-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/08/02 18:31, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Thu Aug 02, 2018 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > > > I also worked on an cmark port. I took your tar ball and fixed all > > comments Stuart pointed out. Just, the MAINTAINER field is still unset, > > But, a portscheck

Re: NEW: devel/cmark

2018-08-02 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Thu Aug 02, 2018 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > I also worked on an cmark port. I took your tar ball and fixed all > comments Stuart pointed out. Just, the MAINTAINER field is still unset, > But, a portscheck run does not require this field. > > I replaced the

Re: NEW: devel/cmark

2018-08-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/08/02 11:03, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi All. > > please find attached a small dependency for the upcoming > multimedia/mkvtoolnix update. All tests are passed on amd64. > > pkg_info: > Information for inst:cmark-0.28.3 > > Comment: > CommonMark parsing and rendering library and program

NEW: devel/cmark

2018-08-02 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Hi All. please find attached a small dependency for the upcoming multimedia/mkvtoolnix update. All tests are passed on amd64. pkg_info: Information for inst:cmark-0.28.3 Comment: CommonMark parsing and rendering library and program in C Required by: mkvtoolnix-25.0.0-no_x11 Description: cmark