Nearly there; couple of minor things:
These lines in Makefile are surplus and can be removed:
DOCFILES= README
BINFILES= tcpserver tcpclient tcprules tcprulescheck
MANFILES= tcpserver.1 tcpclient.1 tcprules.1 tcprulescheck.1
I think this MESSAGE should
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 10:41:03AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Nearly there; couple of minor things:
These lines in Makefile are surplus and can be removed:
DOCFILES= README
BINFILES= tcpserver tcpclient tcprules tcprulescheck
MANFILES=
On 2014/06/04 20:40, Jan Klemkow wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 10:41:03AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Nearly there; couple of minor things:
These lines in Makefile are surplus and can be removed:
DOCFILES= README
BINFILES= tcpserver tcpclient tcprules
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:25:59PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de [2014-06-02 19:56]:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:50:19AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de [2014-06-01 23:38]:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:51:24PM +0100, Stuart
* Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de [2014-06-03 13:09]:
I changed the message to:
Please note, there are scripts which use the softlimit application to
manipulate the datasize limit of tcpclient/tcpserver which may cause
a process termination. To avoid this you could disable the
* Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de [2014-06-01 23:38]:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:51:24PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/05/30 22:43, Jan Klemkow wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:26:43PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 01:49:55PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:50:19AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de [2014-06-01 23:38]:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:51:24PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/05/30 22:43, Jan Klemkow wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:26:43PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
* Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de [2014-06-02 19:56]:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:50:19AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de [2014-06-01 23:38]:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:51:24PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/05/30 22:43, Jan Klemkow wrote:
On
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:51:24PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/05/30 22:43, Jan Klemkow wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:26:43PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 01:49:55PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org [2014-05-28 12:31]:
* Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org [2014-05-28 12:31]:
the old port also had this...is this or something like it still needed?
# datasize limit in 'run' files is too low for ld.so
# to be able to pull in libc
LDFLAGS+= -static
that is everything but smart, it makes MUCH more sense
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 01:49:55PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org [2014-05-28 12:31]:
the old port also had this...is this or something like it still needed?
# datasize limit in 'run' files is too low for ld.so
# to be able to pull in libc
LDFLAGS+=
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:26:43PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 01:49:55PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org [2014-05-28 12:31]:
the old port also had this...is this or something like it still needed?
# datasize limit in 'run' files
On 2014/05/30 22:43, Jan Klemkow wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:26:43PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 01:49:55PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org [2014-05-28 12:31]:
the old port also had this...is this or something like it still
Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org writes:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
j...@wxcvbn.org wrote:
No proper license, approval required for patches and/or no
redistribution of binary packages, bla, bla. I may not remember the
details well enough; like most people
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:38:09AM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org writes:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:14 PM, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas
j...@wxcvbn.org wrote:
No proper license, approval required for patches and/or no
redistribution of
On 2014/05/28 12:16, Jan Klemkow wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:38:09AM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org writes:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:14 PM, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas
j...@wxcvbn.org wrote:
No proper license, approval required
I applied all your hints. Thanks for that, the port is really better
now. Additionally I decided to install all provides binaries and
manpages which are shipped with this software release.
Thanks,
Jan
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:30:52AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/05/28 12:16, Jan
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:38:18PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/05/26 23:30, Jan Klemkow wrote:
Hi,
this is the UCSPI-TCP [0] implementation from Daniel J. Bernstein with
the IPv6 Patch [1] from Felix von Leitner. It is a tcpserver and
tcpclient program like inetd. It is
Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de writes:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:38:18PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/05/26 23:30, Jan Klemkow wrote:
Hi,
this is the UCSPI-TCP [0] implementation from Daniel J. Bernstein with
the IPv6 Patch [1] from Felix von Leitner. It is a tcpserver
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:14:25PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de writes:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:38:18PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/05/26 23:30, Jan Klemkow wrote:
Hi,
this is the UCSPI-TCP [0] implementation from Daniel
Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de writes:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:14:25PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de writes:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:38:18PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/05/26 23:30, Jan Klemkow wrote:
Hi,
this is
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
j...@wxcvbn.org wrote:
No proper license, approval required for patches and/or no
redistribution of binary packages, bla, bla. I may not remember the
details well enough; like most people that were interested in
Hi,
this is the UCSPI-TCP [0] implementation from Daniel J. Bernstein with
the IPv6 Patch [1] from Felix von Leitner. It is a tcpserver and
tcpclient program like inetd. It is the tcp socket corresponding port
to net/ucspi-unix. This port is similar to the unix socket ucspi port.
If any thing
On 2014/05/26 23:30, Jan Klemkow wrote:
Hi,
this is the UCSPI-TCP [0] implementation from Daniel J. Bernstein with
the IPv6 Patch [1] from Felix von Leitner. It is a tcpserver and
tcpclient program like inetd. It is the tcp socket corresponding port
to net/ucspi-unix. This port is
24 matches
Mail list logo
