Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 06:13:02PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
> > Applied, here's the tar attached for convenience.
>
> Anyone willing to OK Paco's port?
ok solene@ :)
you can import
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 06:13:02PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
> Applied, here's the tar attached for convenience.
Anyone willing to OK Paco's port?
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Edd Barrett wrote:
> I think we can make the README more concise, like this:
>
> --- README.orig Fri Dec 14 16:48:13 2018
> +++ README Fri Dec 14 16:49:45 2018
> @@ -4,6 +4,5 @@
> | Running ${PKGSTEM} on OpenBSD
> +--
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 05:31:47PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
> Find attached the port with the README instead of a patch.
Good.
I think we can make the README more concise, like this:
--- README.orig Fri Dec 14 16:48:13 2018
+++ README Fri Dec 14 16:49:45 2018
@@ -4,6 +4,5 @@
| Running ${
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Do we know if this is an OpenBSD-specific issue?
As far as I know, yes. At least I could not reproduce it on a linux box
I have here unsetting LC_*
> If it is, or if we are not sure, I suggest adding that message instead
> to a package README that gets i
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 06:52:14PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
> I guess a note on the README is enough. Here's the port with a patch for
> that. If you think something else should be done, I can maybe contact
> with the author. We've talked a couple of times on IRC and is a nice
> guy.
Do we know
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 02:27:17PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
> > So, given this, should I make it dependent on textproc/py-chardet ? or
> > should be enough with the "set this on your rc file" thing ?
>
> chardet makes no difference, however, setting LC_
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 02:27:17PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
> So, given this, should I make it dependent on textproc/py-chardet ? or
> should be enough with the "set this on your rc file" thing ?
chardet makes no difference, however, setting LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 makes
the crash go away.
Not sur
Hi Edd,
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Port-wise, I have one comment. I'd remove NO_TEST=Yes. Although there are no
> tests, it still succeeds to invoke the test target. If tests are added in a
> later release, we will run them without having to flip NO_TEST.
Ok, I'll remove it.
> I
Hey Paco,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 12:01:12PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote:
> Thanks Solène for your suggestion.
> Here's the updated port.
Port-wise, I have one comment. I'd remove NO_TEST=Yes. Although there are no
tests, it still succeeds to invoke the test target. If tests are added in a
later re
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> Paco Esteban wrote:
> > Ping.
> >
> > (zip attached again)
>
> hi
>
> the port looks fine to me but it doesn't provide any documentation. In the
> sources there is a README.md file which could be used. You can use the port
> sysutils/boar as an exam
Paco Esteban wrote:
> Ping.
>
> (zip attached again)
hi
the port looks fine to me but it doesn't provide any documentation. In the
sources there is a README.md file which could be used. You can use the port
sysutils/boar as an example for adding the README.md file to the package.
Ping.
(zip attached again)
--
Paco Esteban
https://onna.be/gpgkey.asc
vf1.tgz
Description: Binary data
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I guess not too much interest in the 90's protocol from Minneapolis ;)
Yeah, I can't blame anybody for that. It's almost archeology :-P
> Anyway you sent the package, not the port.
And that's the facepalm moment I was expecting ...
Hopefully I'll
On 2018/11/13 20:07, Paco Esteban wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Nov 2018, Paco Esteban wrote:
>
> > ping ...
>
> I guess there's no interest in this port.
>
> Anyway, could somebody please take a look at it just to tell me if
> there's something wrong and/or what can I improve for future reference ?
>
>
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018, Paco Esteban wrote:
> ping ...
I guess there's no interest in this port.
Anyway, could somebody please take a look at it just to tell me if
there's something wrong and/or what can I improve for future reference ?
Thank you.
--
Paco Esteban
https://onna.be/gpgkey.asc
ping ...
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018, Paco Esteban wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Find attached vf1-0.0.10.
> This is a small gopher client written in python I usually use (not
> written by me though).
>
> -
> $ pkg_info vf1
> Information for inst:vf1-0.0.10
>
> Comment:
> command line gopher client
>
> De
Hi all,
Find attached vf1-0.0.10.
This is a small gopher client written in python I usually use (not
written by me though).
-
$ pkg_info vf1
Information for inst:vf1-0.0.10
Comment:
command line gopher client
Description:
VF-1 is a command line gopher client. It is built around an interacti
18 matches
Mail list logo
