On 1/25/08, Antoine Jacoutot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Antti Harri wrote:
> >> If you don't specify a major.minor in the name passed dlopen() it will
> >> select
> >> the one with the highest major then highest minor after that.
>
> Anyone wanting to commit this has my OK; i
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Antti Harri wrote:
If you don't specify a major.minor in the name passed dlopen() it will
select
the one with the highest major then highest minor after that.
Anyone wanting to commit this has my OK; it really fixes things...
Index: Makefile
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Kurt Miller wrote:
I thought about this too. But what version will it use
when there are multiple version installed? For example libGL.so.5.1 and
libGL.so.6.0.
If you don't specify a major.minor in the name passed dlopen() it will select
the one with the highest major then
On Friday 25 January 2008 5:17:28 am Antti Harri wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Peter Strömberg wrote:
> > Eh, why not just use libGL.so so it will find any available version?
>
> I thought about this too. But what version will it use
> when there are multiple version installed? For example libGL.so
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Peter Strömberg wrote:
Eh, why not just use libGL.so so it will find any available version?
I thought about this too. But what version will it use
when there are multiple version installed? For example libGL.so.5.1 and
libGL.so.6.0.
Like we do in firefox:
patch-gfx_src
On 25 Jan 2008 at 0:27, Brad wrote:
> On Friday 25 January 2008 00:21:38 Antti Harri wrote:
> >
> > Anyone?
>
> ok brad@
>
> Though something really needs to be done about fixing this properly.
> IMO this is ridiculous to have a hardcoded shared library name in the
> resulting binary.
Eh, why
On Friday 25 January 2008 00:21:38 Antti Harri wrote:
>
> Anyone?
ok brad@
Though something really needs to be done about fixing this properly.
IMO this is ridiculous to have a hardcoded shared library name in the
resulting binary.
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Antti Harri wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I
Anyone?
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Antti Harri wrote:
Hi,
I found out the reason why some SDL apps were segfaulting.
http://users.openbsd.fi/iku/files/sdl.diff
? w-sdl-1.2.13
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/sdl/Makefi
Hi,
I found out the reason why some SDL apps were segfaulting.
http://users.openbsd.fi/iku/files/sdl.diff
? w-sdl-1.2.13
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/sdl/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u -r1.60 Makefil