Re: Qt5's libtool link scripts are unusable

2019-06-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/06/21 16:45, Marc Espie wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 09:41:23PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > This's what Qt 5.13 doas. They use "<< endl;" instead of "<< "\n";", I > > would like to prefer that. std::endl calls std::flush which synchronizes > > with the underlying storage device.

Re: Qt5's libtool link scripts are unusable

2019-06-21 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 09:41:23PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > This's what Qt 5.13 doas. They use "<< endl;" instead of "<< "\n";", I > would like to prefer that. std::endl calls std::flush which synchronizes > with the underlying storage device. > > RS I agree with using endl if that's

Re: Qt5's libtool link scripts are unusable

2019-06-20 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Thu Jun 20, 2019 at 04:46:59PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Thanks for the report, > > On 2019/06/20 17:30, Vadim Penzin wrote: > > I admit that I am not familiar with the release process of pre-built binary > > packages; I might be writing to a wrong mailing list and I apologize in > >

Re: Qt5's libtool link scripts are unusable

2019-06-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
Thanks for the report, On 2019/06/20 17:30, Vadim Penzin wrote: > I admit that I am not familiar with the release process of pre-built binary > packages; I might be writing to a wrong mailing list and I apologize in > advance. ports@ is the better list for this, I've CC'd and set reply-to. >