Rafael Sadowski writes:
> +@conflict gambatte-qt-<=0.5.0.571p4
No need for this line either, because no files in the new gambatte
package overlap with the old gambatte-qt package. Remove this line
and your diff is ok with me. Don't forget an obsolete_reason quirk.
On Mon Aug 24, 2020 at 04:11:13AM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Rafael Sadowski writes:
> > +PKGNAME= gambatte-$V
> > +REVISION= 5
>
> Spaces please.
>
> > +#.include
>
> Drop the comment.
>
> > +@conflict gambatte-<=0.5.0.571p4
>
> No need to mark a co
Hi Rafael,
Rafael Sadowski writes:
> +PKGNAME= gambatte-$V
> +REVISION=5
Spaces please.
> +#.include
Drop the comment.
> +@conflict gambatte-<=0.5.0.571p4
No need to mark a conflict when the pkgname is identical, right?
--
Anthony J. Bentley
Simple diff to remove -qt(4) multi-packages. The diff does not include
the devel/quirks bits.
Feedback, PLIST feedback? OK?
Rafael Sadowski
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/emulators/gambatte/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1
On Wed Jun 10, 2020 at 07:44:41PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Rafael Sadowski writes:
> > Does it make sense to delete this Qt4 Boy Color emulator? I see
> > alternatives in the ports tree and I would like to see less Qt4
> > consumers. [...]
> >
> > Keep or remove?
>
> I se
Hi Rafael,
Rafael Sadowski writes:
> Does it make sense to delete this Qt4 Boy Color emulator? I see
> alternatives in the ports tree and I would like to see less Qt4
> consumers. [...]
>
> Keep or remove?
I see where you're coming from. Gambatte is an important emulator, even
among its competito
Hi ports@, Hi Anthony J. Bentley,
Does it make sense to delete this Qt4 Boy Color emulator? I see
alternatives in the ports tree and I would like to see less Qt4
consumers. Last upstream update from "2014-09-28". sourceforge status
beta.
Keep or remove?
Rafael
