On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:07:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> The attached port builds, but doesn't produce a shared library, which
> the produced binaries rely upon, so it doesn't actually work..
>
Ah, cool!
It seems your configure patch fixes that specfic build problem I
described.
>
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:27:19PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/06/06 22:07, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2013/06/06 21:48, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have been looking at porting SoftHSM
> > > (http://www.opendnssec.org/softhsm/) and later looking at the OpenDNS
On 2013/06/06 22:07, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/06/06 21:48, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have been looking at porting SoftHSM
> > (http://www.opendnssec.org/softhsm/) and later looking at the OpenDNSSEC
> > tool (http://www.opendnssec.org/).
> >
> > I have been stopped in my
On 2013/06/06 21:48, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been looking at porting SoftHSM
> (http://www.opendnssec.org/softhsm/) and later looking at the OpenDNSSEC
> tool (http://www.opendnssec.org/).
>
> I have been stopped in my tracks by the libtool in base, but I am not
> sure i really n
Hello,
I have been looking at porting SoftHSM
(http://www.opendnssec.org/softhsm/) and later looking at the OpenDNSSEC
tool (http://www.opendnssec.org/).
I have been stopped in my tracks by the libtool in base, but I am not
sure i really need to activate the GNU version as I am possibly just
miss
