Julian Frede wrote:
I am sorry do get my hands dirty with a thread like that but I just can't
help my self.
The only thing I thought of when reading peters post was:
Why the hell didn't he send a patch to the maintainer?
because he's busy sucking on a bag of dicks.
-Julian
--
I am sorry do get my hands dirty with a thread like that but I just can't
help my self.
The only thing I thought of when reading peters post was:
Why the hell didn't he send a patch to the maintainer?
-Julian
--
Lubarsky's Law of Cybernetic Entomology:
There's always one more bug.
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:47:56AM -0400, Peter Thoenen wrote:
> I hate to call Rui out in public but he is the maintainer here and very
> non responsive to private emails about this.
you are kidding, right?
I answered to your first email and told you how OpenBSD works.
As nikolay@ said "Tor 1.2
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:29:25AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> I agree with you on this -current/-stable thingy. This ports tree
>> soft locking shit *how we care about -stable users* is bullshit,
>> when outdated/security vulnerable stuff is even in -current and
>> it takes ages to backport and
* Peter Thoenen [2007-08-08]:
> Tor 1.1.x has BEEN DEPRECIATED from before the time 4.1 STABLE was
Tor 1.2 only came out around the release of 4.1 and no update was marked
a security update, so there was no reason to update the -stable ports.
We have our policies and we do have them for a good rea
> I agree with you on this -current/-stable thingy. This ports tree
> soft locking shit *how we care about -stable users* is bullshit,
> when outdated/security vulnerable stuff is even in -current and
> it takes ages to backport and make packages of needed security updates...
> I see there no logic
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:47:56AM -0400, Peter Thoenen wrote:
>I hate to call Rui out in public but he is the maintainer here and very
>non responsive to private emails about this.
>
>Tor 1.1.x has BEEN DEPRECIATED from before the time 4.1 STABLE was
>released (you were notified of this also Rui)
On 8/8/07, Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hate to call Rui out in public but he is the maintainer here and very
> non responsive to private emails about this.
>
> Tor 1.1.x has BEEN DEPRECIATED from before the time 4.1 STABLE was
> released (you were notified of this also Rui) and all
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:47:56AM -0400, Peter Thoenen wrote:
> I hate to call Rui out in public but he is the maintainer here and
> very non responsive to private emails about this.
A fix (up to 0.1.2.16) was committed to -current yesterday; it was
MFCed this morning.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi
I hate to call Rui out in public but he is the maintainer here and very
non responsive to private emails about this.
Tor 1.1.x has BEEN DEPRECIATED from before the time 4.1 STABLE was
released (you were notified of this also Rui) and all version earlier
than 1.2.15 suffer a remote code exploitatio
10 matches
Mail list logo