Re: UPDATE: emulators/sdlmame 0.150 = 0.153

2014-05-14 Thread Brian Callahan
On 04/28/14 18:31, Brian Callahan wrote: On 04/28/14 01:47, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: Brian Callahan writes: On 04/18/14 10:06, Brian Callahan wrote: Hi ports -- After missing a few versions (which, amazingly, shipped broken), here's an update for MAME to its latest verison. Did the

Re: UPDATE: emulators/sdlmame 0.150 = 0.153

2014-05-14 Thread Landry Breuil
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:02:58PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote: On 04/28/14 18:31, Brian Callahan wrote: On 04/28/14 01:47, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: Brian Callahan writes: On 04/18/14 10:06, Brian Callahan wrote: Hi ports -- After missing a few versions (which, amazingly, shipped

Re: UPDATE: emulators/sdlmame 0.150 = 0.153

2014-04-28 Thread David Coppa
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Brian Callahan bcal...@devio.us wrote: The netlist/nl_base.h patch feels weird, and makes me wonder if I haven't missed something obvious. I think it's needed for deconflicting: $ grep -w _C /usr/include/ctype.h #define _C 0x20 Ciao, David

Re: UPDATE: emulators/sdlmame 0.150 = 0.153

2014-04-28 Thread Brian Callahan
On 04/28/14 01:47, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: Brian Callahan writes: On 04/18/14 10:06, Brian Callahan wrote: Hi ports -- After missing a few versions (which, amazingly, shipped broken), here's an update for MAME to its latest verison. Did the licensing kerfuffle ever get resolved? (A few

Re: UPDATE: emulators/sdlmame 0.150 = 0.153

2014-04-27 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Brian Callahan writes: On 04/18/14 10:06, Brian Callahan wrote: Hi ports -- After missing a few versions (which, amazingly, shipped broken), here's an update for MAME to its latest verison. Did the licensing kerfuffle ever get resolved? (A few months ago Haze complained about a

UPDATE: emulators/sdlmame 0.150 = 0.153

2014-04-18 Thread Brian Callahan
Hi ports -- After missing a few versions (which, amazingly, shipped broken), here's an update for MAME to its latest verison. The netlist/nl_base.h patch feels weird, and makes me wonder if I haven't missed something obvious. I'll be sending a second mail for sdlmess shortly. This works