Re: UPDATE: net/prosody 0.11.5 from maintainer

2020-06-02 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:22:27PM +, Lucas wrote: > Lucas wrote: > > Okey, updated patch in here. It still runs OK in my server. > > The bump never ends. Sorry - commited!

Re: UPDATE: net/prosody 0.11.5 from maintainer

2020-05-29 Thread Lucas
Lucas wrote: > Okey, updated patch in here. It still runs OK in my server. The bump never ends. -Lucas Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/net/prosody/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.56 diff -u -p -r1.56 Makefile ---

Re: UPDATE: net/prosody 0.11.5 from maintainer

2020-05-22 Thread Lucas
Stuart Henderson wrote: > I would just use the common idiom used by other ports. If there is a > problem with that then I guess they'll all need fixing in a sweep. Okey, updated patch in here. It still runs OK in my server. -Lucas Index: Makefile

Re: UPDATE: net/prosody 0.11.5 from maintainer

2020-05-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/05/16 20:08, Lucas wrote: > Bump, now that the ports embargo is over. > > Stuart, do you prefer if I use the more common idiom in pexp and drop > the eval? The comment from /src/etc/rc.d/rc.subr makes sense IMO, but > this will be the only port using that idiom out of the 138 that define

UPDATE: net/prosody 0.11.5 from maintainer

2020-05-16 Thread Lucas
Bump, now that the ports embargo is over. Stuart, do you prefer if I use the more common idiom in pexp and drop the eval? The comment from /src/etc/rc.d/rc.subr makes sense IMO, but this will be the only port using that idiom out of the 138 that define pexp. rc.subr,v 1.134 fragment for