On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Edd Barrett vex...@gmail.com wrote:
Python argument aside, as it stands, it seems tint2-0.10 has a whole
bunch of bugs.So I think perhaps we will skip this release and pick up
development on 0.11.
I agree, but imho you should commit a fix for the
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Will Maier willma...@ml1.net wrote:
Hi Stu-
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:14:58PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Hmm. Untested but I suspect if someone runs it as root, it will leave
a .pyc around that pkg_delete won't remove..
The interpreter only leaves .pyc
Hi,
Have a play, but be aware of:
http://code.google.com/p/tint2/issues/list?can=2q=reporter:vext01
tint2conf and low_battery_cmd is flakey.
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
? LOG
? patches.new
? tint2conf.core
Index: Makefile
On 2010/06/11 17:18, Edd Barrett wrote:
Index: pkg/PLIST
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/tint/pkg/PLIST,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -u -r1.2 PLIST
--- pkg/PLIST 19 Apr 2010 13:55:56 - 1.2
+++ pkg/PLIST 11 Jun
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 05:31:18PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2010/06/11 17:18, Edd Barrett wrote:
Index: pkg/PLIST
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/tint/pkg/PLIST,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -u -r1.2 PLIST
Hi All-
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:02:03PM +0100, Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 05:31:18PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2010/06/11 17:18, Edd Barrett wrote:
Index: pkg/PLIST
===
RCS file:
On 2010/06/11 12:07, Will Maier wrote:
Hi All-
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:02:03PM +0100, Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 05:31:18PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2010/06/11 17:18, Edd Barrett wrote:
Index: pkg/PLIST
Hi Stu-
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:14:58PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Hmm. Untested but I suspect if someone runs it as root, it will leave
a .pyc around that pkg_delete won't remove..
The interpreter only leaves .pyc files when it loads modules, not when it
executes scripts:
$
