On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:03:32PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
Please test. OK?
Any opinions?
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:04:02PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
ConTeXt is a pure TeX macro package and it does not need any of
texlive's 'overhead',
Well, that's not strictly true; it requires luatex and metapost.
Kili has suggested pulling context out of texlive and building a current
hmm, on Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:03:32PM +, Edd Barrett said that
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:04:02PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
ConTeXt is a pure TeX macro package and it does not need any of
texlive's 'overhead',
Well, that's not strictly true; it requires luatex and metapost.
that
hmm, on Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:06:50PM +, Edd Barrett said that
Given that few people are using context on OpenBSD, I am going to
reccommend adding stage two as a manually run step a user can undertake
*if* they want to use context.
Is it about time ConTeXt has it's own port? This is
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:28:53PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
Sadly, IIRC, it looks like context uses a single database file under
texmf-var, although i would have to check this (currently on a train).
I did some digging. Two pieces of good news.
ConTeXt puts one hash per texmf tree under
I looked into what would need to be done to package separately. It still
needs metapost and luatex, which makes it a pain to separate.
Making ls-R at fake time might be possible, but how would you deal with
different subsets being installed? As long as we make sure external ports
only ever
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:40:35PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
I looked into what would need to be done to package separately. It still
needs metapost and luatex, which makes it a pain to separate.
It could just depend (run- and/or build-, whatever is needed) on the
texlive packages
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 01:00:01AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
Also I will look into making a separate port.
I know nothing about tex, texlive etc... But isn't texlive a distribution
of various tex related apps? Then if you would create separate
context port what would happen with context included
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:11:14PM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 01:00:01AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
Also I will look into making a separate port.
I know nothing about tex, texlive etc... But isn't texlive a distribution
of various tex related apps? Then if you would create
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 01:00:01AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
For context, I assume it lives in one specific package, so you could
prepare
it and stuff it in the package.
I was not working under this assumption, but you might get away with it. If
new packages start installing context crap,
For context, I assume it lives in one specific package, so you could
prepare
it and stuff it in the package.
I was not working under this assumption, but you might get away with it. If
new packages start installing context crap, then we would have to change
our plan ofcourse...
Also I will
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:05:49PM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:49:16AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
Try installing texmf-full.
$ pkg_info | grep texlive
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:06:50PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:05:49PM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:49:16AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
Try installing texmf-full.
$ pkg_info | grep texlive
For the same reason we don't include ls-R in packages. We don't know what
will be in the texmf tree. Packages can install extra crap and users can
make system-local additions which all need to be hashed.
On Dec 16, 2011 2:30 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 05:40:33PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
For the same reason we don't include ls-R in packages. We don't know
what will be in the texmf tree. Packages can install extra crap and
users can make system-local additions which all need to be hashed.
Those are bad
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:49:16AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
Try installing texmf-full.
$ pkg_info | grep texlive
texlive_base-2011p0 base
Alright. Its on my todo list.
On Dec 14, 2011 10:10 PM, Jiri B ji...@devio.us wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:49:16AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
Try installing texmf-full.
$ pkg_info | grep texlive
texlive_base-2011p0 base binaries for TeXLive typesetting distribution
Hello,
I've started to learn TEX etc... and when I tried this
I probably have found an error.
$ pkg_info | grep texlive_texmf-minimal
texlive_texmf-minimal-2011 texlive texmf for laTeX/PdfTeX
$ context --version
mtxrun
Try installing texmf-full.
On Dec 13, 2011 11:56 PM, Jiri B ji...@devio.us wrote:
Hello,
I've started to learn TEX etc... and when I tried this
I probably have found an error.
$ pkg_info | grep texlive_texmf-minimal
texlive_texmf-minimal-2011 texlive texmf for laTeX/PdfTeX
$ context
19 matches
Mail list logo
