Re: cvs problem: most of ports tree removed?

2007-05-24 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/05/24 21:19, Keith Matthews wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:09:28 +0200 > "Landry Breuil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2007/5/24, Markus Lude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > Hello, > > > when I updated my ports tree today from anoncvs.de.openbsd.org most of > > > it was removed. While

Re: cvs problem: most of ports tree removed?

2007-05-24 Thread Keith Matthews
On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:09:28 +0200 "Landry Breuil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/5/24, Markus Lude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hello, > > when I updated my ports tree today from anoncvs.de.openbsd.org most of > > it was removed. While looking at cvsweb at www.openbsd.org there lots of > > fil

Re: cvs problem: most of ports tree removed?

2007-05-24 Thread Landry Breuil
2007/5/24, Markus Lude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello, when I updated my ports tree today from anoncvs.de.openbsd.org most of it was removed. While looking at cvsweb at www.openbsd.org there lots of files were missing too. Does anyone know what has happened? I'm running -current: OpenBSD 4.1-curr

cvs problem: most of ports tree removed?

2007-05-24 Thread Markus Lude
Hello, when I updated my ports tree today from anoncvs.de.openbsd.org most of it was removed. While looking at cvsweb at www.openbsd.org there lots of files were missing too. Does anyone know what has happened? I'm running -current: OpenBSD 4.1-current (GENERIC) #1246: Sun May 20 23:34:50 MDT 20