On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 07:36:33 -, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> 10/15/23 15:04, Todd C. Miller пишет:
> >> Ha, that's way easier than poking at the Makefile, although I'm inclined
> >> to stick to the diff that tb bulk-tested, just to be sure for now.
>
> tb reported that your appraoch doesn't work
10/15/23 15:04, Todd C. Miller пишет:
>> Ha, that's way easier than poking at the Makefile, although I'm inclined
>> to stick to the diff that tb bulk-tested, just to be sure for now.
tb reported that your appraoch doesn't work with MAKE_JOBS=1
whereas mine does, so I'll stick with that.
> I
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 10:35:08 -, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 04:02:46PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> > I have the following in my WIP bison port's Makefile.
> >
> > # Avoid regenerating bison.info
> > post-configure:
> > touch ${WRKSRC}/doc/*.info
>
> Ha, that's way
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 04:02:46PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> I have the following in my WIP bison port's Makefile.
>
> # Avoid regenerating bison.info
> post-configure:
> touch ${WRKSRC}/doc/*.info
Ha, that's way easier than poking at the Makefile, although I'm inclined
to stick to
I have the following in my WIP bison port's Makefile.
# Avoid regenerating bison.info
post-configure:
touch ${WRKSRC}/doc/*.info
I've been using bison 3.8.2 for some time.
- todd
> I don't fully understand the make job race inside this GNU auto*/make code,
> but here's the same update with a simpler Makefile.in patch that reliably
> packages bison regardless of MAKE_JOBS.
That works for me. No fallout in an amd64 bulk, so it seems the failures
we saw a few years back when
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 03:27:05PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> This randomly doesn't package with
>
> makeinfo: unknown option --
> set-customization-variable=SECTION_NAME_IN_TITLE=true
Our current Makefile.in patch addresses this and works for the current
version regardless of MAKE_JOBS, but
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 06:39:21PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 11:30:49AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > http://savannah.gnu.org/news/?id=10011 3.8.1 came out two years ago,
> > I couldn't find release notes for 3.8.2; above news don't seem harmless,
> > but the list of
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 11:30:49AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/news/?id=10011 3.8.1 came out two years ago,
> I couldn't find release notes for 3.8.2; above news don't seem harmless,
> but the list of consumers is huge, so I'd appreciate if someone could test
> this in a
On 2023/09/20 11:30, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> -MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_GNU:=bison/}
> +SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_GNU:=bison/}
and
SITES= ${SITE_GNU:=bison/}
after release.
On 2023/09/20 11:30, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/news/?id=10011 3.8.1 came out two years ago,
> I couldn't find release notes for 3.8.2; above news don't seem harmless,
> but the list of consumers is huge, so I'd appreciate if someone could test
> this in a full
http://savannah.gnu.org/news/?id=10011 3.8.1 came out two years ago,
I couldn't find release notes for 3.8.2; above news don't seem harmless,
but the list of consumers is huge, so I'd appreciate if someone could test
this in a full bulk.
amd64:
723 tests were successful.
53 tests were
12 matches
Mail list logo
