On 2014/06/01 14:02, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/05/31 13:47, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org writes:
Awesome! We probably need to delete more lines. Not sure a good way
to feed this sort of change back to upstreams though, as they *do* need
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org writes:
On 2014/06/01 14:02, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/05/31 13:47, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org writes:
Awesome! We probably need to delete more lines. Not sure a good way
to feed this sort of change back
On 2014/06/02 13:24, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
The *LibreSSL* documentation does, the original RAND_load_file.pod
doesn't advise against using it.
argh. In that case, this fix won't be sufficient for upstream (assuming
they care about Windows).
Also our rand.pod (RAND(3)) still
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org writes:
On 2014/06/02 13:24, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
The *LibreSSL* documentation does, the original RAND_load_file.pod
doesn't advise against using it.
argh. In that case, this fix won't be sufficient for upstream (assuming
they care about
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 01:47:12PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org writes:
Awesome! We probably need to delete more lines. Not sure a good way
to feed this sort of change back to upstreams though, as they *do* need
this with OpenSSL.
[...]
I
On 2014/06/01 12:47, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 01:47:12PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org writes:
Awesome! We probably need to delete more lines. Not sure a good way
to feed this sort of change back to upstreams though, as they
On 2014/05/31 13:47, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org writes:
Awesome! We probably need to delete more lines. Not sure a good way
to feed this sort of change back to upstreams though, as they *do* need
this with OpenSSL.
[...]
I agree that more
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 13:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
An alternative would be to implement stubs in libressl returning -1...
We've decided these APIs are simply too poisonous to remain, in any
form.
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org writes:
Awesome! We probably need to delete more lines. Not sure a good way
to feed this sort of change back to upstreams though, as they *do* need
this with OpenSSL.
[...]
I agree that more lines should be deleted. Is this clear enough?
Index: Makefile
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:07:33AM +0100, Zé Loff wrote:
I know, that subject's line is too long, but I didn't manage to phrase
that in a shorter form. On the upside, it pretty much tells the whole
story: elinks is creating a file on ~ whose name is the contents of
~/elinks/elinks.conf.
I
Awesome! We probably need to delete more lines. Not sure a good way
to feed this sort of change back to upstreams though, as they *do* need
this with OpenSSL.
On 2014/05/30 18:15, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:07:33AM +0100, Zé Loff wrote:
I know, that subject's line is too
Ouch, I'll look at that as soon as I find some time.
On 22 May 2014 00:08, Zé Loff zel...@zeloff.org wrote:
I know, that subject's line is too long, but I didn't manage to phrase
that in a shorter form. On the upside, it pretty much tells the whole
story: elinks is creating a file on ~ whose
I know, that subject's line is too long, but I didn't manage to phrase
that in a shorter form. On the upside, it pretty much tells the whole
story: elinks is creating a file on ~ whose name is the contents of
~/elinks/elinks.conf.
$ cat .elinks/elinks.conf
set
13 matches
Mail list logo
