On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:01:00 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> even though it seems likely that the ABI is compatible, I think it may
> be beneficial to bump the library version of this compared to what
> sysutils/eventlog has. I'd probably go with a major bump to make sure
> things are clean.
>
>
Stuart Henderson [2021-04-29, 19:01:00]:
> +cc steven in case he's around;
>
> On 2021/04/29 11:29, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:21:24 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > Yes retiring the separate port makes sense.
> >
> > Here's a diff that just changes
+cc steven in case he's around;
On 2021/04/29 11:29, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:21:24 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > Yes retiring the separate port makes sense.
>
> Here's a diff that just changes sysyutils/syslog-ng to use the
> bundled copy of libevtlog. After this
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:21:24 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Yes retiring the separate port makes sense.
Here's a diff that just changes sysyutils/syslog-ng to use the
bundled copy of libevtlog. After this is committed I will remove
sysyutils/eventlog.
OK?
- todd
Index:
Yes retiring the separate port makes sense.
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 29 April 2021 02:36:03 Todd C. Miller wrote:
Our sysutils/syslog-ng port uses the libevtlog.so from the
sysutils/eventlog port instead of the version shipped with syslog-ng.
However, eventlog
Our sysutils/syslog-ng port uses the libevtlog.so from the
sysutils/eventlog port instead of the version shipped with syslog-ng.
However, eventlog doesn't seem to be developed outside of syslog-ng
anymore. The last commit to https://github.com/balabit/eventlog
was in 2015 and the source shipped
