Re: m68k breakage

2006-02-22 Thread Martin Reindl
Miod Vallat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this really worth bumping the package name? This does not change anything on platforms where it compiles. true

Re: m68k breakage

2006-02-22 Thread Miod Vallat
Is this really worth bumping the package name? This does not change anything on platforms where it compiles. something like this then: Index: Makefile === RCS file: /usr/cvs/ports/net/kismet/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.8

Re: m68k breakage

2006-02-22 Thread Brad
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 09:25:35PM +0100, Nikolay Sturm wrote: * Miod Vallat [2006-02-22]: Is this really worth bumping the package name? This does not change anything on platforms where it compiles. Wrong question, package name bumps are cheap and our motto is If in doubt, bump!. Still,

Re: m68k breakage

2006-02-14 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:17:11PM +0100, Martin Reindl wrote: kismet-200508R1p1.log gcc2? Could you send me this one? I can't promise to unbreak it for m68k, but at least I should have a look at it. [...] no biggie with this one, none of our m68k archs has