On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 00:24:58 +0100, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> > > Does anyone want to throw this into a bulk?
> >
> > Honestly I don't think a bulk is needed for such a port, I don't
> > know why s-r-d says that. Your call.
>
> generally I think s-r-d is more useful for "how much trouble mig
On 2019/06/06 15:38, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 21:06:16 +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>
> > Simple update required for another port I'm working on, which is happy
> > with this version.
> >
> > Other than that, regress continues to pass on amd64 but it did not
> > test any other co
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 03:38:21PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> HOMEPAGE seems to be broken, can you remove it (or put something that
> works)?
Removed it to use the PyPi default, cheers.
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 21:06:16 +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Simple update required for another port I'm working on, which is happy
> with this version.
>
> Other than that, regress continues to pass on amd64 but it did not
> test any other consumer:
>
> $ show-reverse-deps devel/py-decorato
Simple update required for another port I'm working on, which is happy
with this version.
Other than that, regress continues to pass on amd64 but it did not test
any other consumer:
$ show-reverse-deps devel/py-decorator | wc -l
7482
Does anyone want to throw this into a bulk
