On 2016/03/20 00:36, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Stuart Henderson writes:
>
> > On 2016/03/17 21:04, Michael McConville wrote:
> >> It's only got fixing tweaks since it was imported in 1998, nothing
> >> depends on it, and (this is a good red flag for deletion candidates) it
> >> still has
On 2016/03/17 21:04, Michael McConville wrote:
> It's only got fixing tweaks since it was imported in 1998, nothing
> depends on it, and (this is a good red flag for deletion candidates) it
> still has patches removing gets(3). The source files in the tarball are
> timestamped 1993-94 and the openi
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2016/03/17 21:04, Michael McConville wrote:
>> It's only got fixing tweaks since it was imported in 1998, nothing
>> depends on it, and (this is a good red flag for deletion candidates) it
>> still has patches removing gets(3). The source files in the tarball are
>>
It's only got fixing tweaks since it was imported in 1998, nothing
depends on it, and (this is a good red flag for deletion candidates) it
still has patches removing gets(3). The source files in the tarball are
timestamped 1993-94 and the opening paragraph of the README is:
> I found this in a zip
