Jeremie Courreges-Anglas writes:
> Michael McConville writes:
>
>> Michael McConville wrote:
>>> Reasoning:
>>>
>>> o the code was last touched in 1995
>>>
>>> o the port hasn't been updated since import in 1999
>>>
>>> o it's obviously a very
Michael McConville writes:
> Michael McConville wrote:
>> Reasoning:
>>
>> o the code was last touched in 1995
>>
>> o the port hasn't been updated since import in 1999
>>
>> o it's obviously a very security-sensitive tool
>>
>> Alternatively, someone could update to a
Michael McConville wrote:
> Reasoning:
>
> o the code was last touched in 1995
>
> o the port hasn't been updated since import in 1999
>
> o it's obviously a very security-sensitive tool
>
> Alternatively, someone could update to a fork. I could only find this
> one, which doesn't seem
Reasoning:
o the code was last touched in 1995
o the port hasn't been updated since import in 1999
o it's obviously a very security-sensitive tool
Alternatively, someone could update to a fork. I could only find this
one, which doesn't seem popular and hasn't been touched in three years: