On 2020/05/21 13:49, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:58:37AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > I've written a patch to add bsd-auth support back to slock 1.4 which
> > I've been using for a while. Tidied the make variable handling a bit
> > as well, no need to patch to use ?=,
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 02:15:58AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > Actually, i3 has a feature for dealing with it though, --release:
> > try better: bindsym --release $mod+Mod1+l exec "slock"
>
> That works, thanks. I'm fine with this going in if the port's copy of
> explicit_bzero is disabled
> Actually, i3 has a feature for dealing with it though, --release:
> try better: bindsym --release $mod+Mod1+l exec "slock"
That works, thanks. I'm fine with this going in if the port's copy of
explicit_bzero is disabled with "COMPATSRC=".
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 01:49:36PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:58:37AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > I've written a patch to add bsd-auth support back to slock 1.4 which
> > I've been using for a while. Tidied the make variable handling a bit
> > as well, no need
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:58:37AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I've written a patch to add bsd-auth support back to slock 1.4 which
> I've been using for a while. Tidied the make variable handling a bit
> as well, no need to patch to use ?=, they can just be overridden with
> MAKE_FLAGS. OK?
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:58:37AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I've written a patch to add bsd-auth support back to slock 1.4 which
> I've been using for a while. Tidied the make variable handling a bit
> as well, no need to patch to use ?=, they can just be overridden with
> MAKE_FLAGS. OK?
I've written a patch to add bsd-auth support back to slock 1.4 which
I've been using for a while. Tidied the make variable handling a bit
as well, no need to patch to use ?=, they can just be overridden with
MAKE_FLAGS. OK?
Index: Makefile
