OK? Comments?
On Sep 17 21:46:29, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> On Sep 15 12:51:55, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > Would anyone miss the libmagic functionality
> > if it was removed from audio/sox?
>
> On Sep 15 20:36:52, s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
> > I wouldn't miss it.
>
> On Sep 16 11:04:09, a...@caoua.
On 2016/09/17 21:46, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Sep 15 12:51:55, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > Would anyone miss the libmagic functionality
> > if it was removed from audio/sox?
>
> On Sep 15 20:36:52, s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
> > I wouldn't miss it.
>
> On Sep 16 11:04:09, a...@caoua.org wrote:
> > unl
On Sep 15 12:51:55, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> Would anyone miss the libmagic functionality
> if it was removed from audio/sox?
On Sep 15 20:36:52, s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
> I wouldn't miss it.
On Sep 16 11:04:09, a...@caoua.org wrote:
> unlikely; nowadays most (all?) files have the standard exte
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:51:55PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> Would anyone miss the libmagic functionality
> if it was removed from audio/sox?
unlikely; nowadays most (all?) files have the standard extensions
and the remaining ones are easily handled with file(1).
Would anyone miss the libmagic functionality
if it was removed from audio/sox?
Jan
