I'd really, really like to get an updated sbcl in 7.1, so I'll commit
the attached diff in a couple of days if I don't hear complaints.
I've updated to sbcl 2.2.3 (released some days ago) which includes the
diff for sb-capstone. Both flavors builds fine on amd64 and x11/stumpwm
builds too. I've
friendly weekly ping
(while here also dropped the last rcs id in patches)
Omar Polo wrote:
> Joshua Elsasser wrote:
> > I will try to find some time to take a look at it this week. For what
> > it's worth, 32-bit powerpc is usually a bit broken on non-openbsd
> > platforms as well. I have a
Joshua Elsasser wrote:
> I will try to find some time to take a look at it this week. For what
> it's worth, 32-bit powerpc is usually a bit broken on non-openbsd
> platforms as well. I have a couple g4 mac minis that I can test on,
> assuming they haven't died.
thanks for looking into this :)
George Koehler wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:12:50 +0100
> Omar Polo wrote:
>
> > Attaching an updated diff with the correct types (for cs-version too as
> > you spotted in a previous mail.)
>
> ok gkoehler@
just a quick follow up, the capstone.lisp patch was successfully
upstreamed, thanks
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:12:50 +0100
Omar Polo wrote:
> Attaching an updated diff with the correct types (for cs-version too as
> you spotted in a previous mail.)
ok gkoehler@
"make test" on powerpc with sbcl-2.2.1 is much like 2.1.11.
2.1.11 ->
George Koehler writes:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 09:12:34 +0100
> Omar Polo wrote:
>
>> I've yet to find a list of types and their counterpart in C in the sbcl
>> documentation, I'm only finding stuff for sb-groveler which uses
>> sb-alien. Anyway, I *think* that `integer' and `unsigned' should
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 09:12:34 +0100
Omar Polo wrote:
> I've yet to find a list of types and their counterpart in C in the sbcl
> documentation, I'm only finding stuff for sb-groveler which uses
> sb-alien. Anyway, I *think* that `integer' and `unsigned' should mirror
> their C counterpart (int
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 11:58:49PM -0500, George Koehler wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:08:34 +0100
> Omar Polo wrote:
>
> > I think I've finally solved it. The problem is that contrib/sb-capstone
> > hardcodes some values from capstone.h so lisp can call the C functions.
> > This
George Koehler writes:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:08:34 +0100
> Omar Polo wrote:
>
>> I think I've finally solved it. The problem is that contrib/sb-capstone
>> hardcodes some values from capstone.h so lisp can call the C functions.
>> This "transcription" however is not accurate and worked
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:08:34 +0100
Omar Polo wrote:
> I think I've finally solved it. The problem is that contrib/sb-capstone
> hardcodes some values from capstone.h so lisp can call the C functions.
> This "transcription" however is not accurate and worked until now by
> pure chance on 64 bit
>> George Koehler writes:
>>
>>> I have a problem: if devel/capstone/main is installed, then sbcl fails
>>> to build on powerpc. This happens with sbcl-2.1.11 or sbcl-2.2.1.
>>>
>>> sbcl doesn't depend on capstone, and doesn't need capstone to build
>>> contrib/sb-capstone, but does try to test
Omar Polo writes:
> George Koehler writes:
>
>>> [..]
>>
>> I have a problem: if devel/capstone/main is installed, then sbcl fails
>> to build on powerpc. This happens with sbcl-2.1.11 or sbcl-2.2.1.
>>
>> sbcl doesn't depend on capstone, and doesn't need capstone to build
>>
George Koehler writes:
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:29:18 +0100
> Omar Polo wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> please find attached a trivial diff to update lang/sbcl to the latest
>> version, 2.2.1 release the last January 30.
>>
>> The changelog is here: http://www.sbcl.org/news.html#2.2.1
>>
>> `make
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:29:18 +0100
Omar Polo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please find attached a trivial diff to update lang/sbcl to the latest
> version, 2.2.1 release the last January 30.
>
> The changelog is here: http://www.sbcl.org/news.html#2.2.1
>
> `make test' seems just like the current
Hello,
please find attached a trivial diff to update lang/sbcl to the latest
version, 2.2.1 release the last January 30.
The changelog is here: http://www.sbcl.org/news.html#2.2.1
`make test' seems just like the current version, I'm typing this mail
from stumpwm built with sbcl-threads, and
15 matches
Mail list logo
