Re: www/clearsilver

2017-03-22 Thread Okan Demirmen
On Tue 2017.03.21 at 21:38 +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2017/03/21 12:05, Okan Demirmen wrote: > > Anyone care if this goes? > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Okan Demirmen wrote: > > > > > Anyone still using or interested in this port? It's fairly old, > > > unmaintained upstream

Re: www/clearsilver

2017-03-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/03/21 12:05, Okan Demirmen wrote: > Anyone care if this goes? > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Okan Demirmen wrote: > > > Anyone still using or interested in this port? It's fairly old, > > unmaintained upstream and was never updated even to the 2007 version > > due to the license c

Re: www/clearsilver

2017-03-21 Thread mitchell wodach
I say junk it. But that's my 2 cents. On Mar 21, 2017 11:06 AM, "Okan Demirmen" wrote: Anyone care if this goes? On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Okan Demirmen wrote: > Anyone still using or interested in this port? It's fairly old, > unmaintained upstream and was never updated even to the 2

Re: www/clearsilver

2017-03-21 Thread Okan Demirmen
Anyone care if this goes? On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Okan Demirmen wrote: > Anyone still using or interested in this port? It's fairly old, > unmaintained upstream and was never updated even to the 2007 version > due to the license change to Apache2. > > Zap it? or any takers? > > Thanks.

www/clearsilver

2016-04-28 Thread Okan Demirmen
Anyone still using or interested in this port? It's fairly old, unmaintained upstream and was never updated even to the 2007 version due to the license change to Apache2. Zap it? or any takers? Thanks.

www/clearsilver: zap apache1 mod_ecs.so

2016-04-28 Thread Stuart Henderson
remove apache1 dep, and clean up plists. ok? Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/clearsilver/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.29 diff -u -p -r1.29 Makefile --- Makefile20 Mar 2016 16:12:26 - 1.29 +++ Makefile

Re: patch: www/clearsilver (new flavor)

2005-07-24 Thread Nikolay Sturm
* David Terrell [2005-07-24]: > I have a similar patch that uses PSEUDO_FLAVOR and creates a -python > subpackage instead... Sorry I didn't submit it sooner. According to Ben the FLAVOR changes other files as well, so a SUBPACKAGE is not applicable. Furthermore his diff got committed. Nikolay

Re: patch: www/clearsilver (new flavor)

2005-07-24 Thread David Terrell
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 04:20:11PM +0200, Simon Dassow wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 04:49:23PM -0700, Ben Lovett wrote: > > I sent this to markus@ about two weeks ago, and have not heard > > anything from him about it. This is needed for the port of trac that > > I submitted here. > > Test

Re: patch: www/clearsilver (new flavor)

2005-07-19 Thread Simon Dassow
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 04:49:23PM -0700, Ben Lovett wrote: > I sent this to markus@ about two weeks ago, and have not heard > anything from him about it. This is needed for the port of trac that > I submitted here. Tested and running on i386, thanks Ben. Regards, Simon

patch: www/clearsilver (new flavor)

2005-07-18 Thread Ben Lovett
I sent this to markus@ about two weeks ago, and have not heard anything from him about it. This is needed for the port of trac that I submitted here. http://tilderoot.com/~ben/openbsd/ports/clearsilver-python.diff Markus, is this acceptable to you? thanks, --ben PGP.sig Description: This