Re: x11/qt5/{qtgraphicaleffects,qtquickcontrols*} when not x86

2019-02-13 Thread Charlene Wendling
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:20:45 -0500 George Koehler wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:54:05 +0100 > Charlene Wendling wrote: > > > I'm a bit out of topic here, but all x11/qt5 binaries seem to > > segfault at runtime with ports-gcc-4.9 on macppc - it just worked > > fine with ports-gcc-8.2. > >

Re: x11/qt5/{qtgraphicaleffects,qtquickcontrols*} when not x86

2019-02-13 Thread George Koehler
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:54:05 +0100 Charlene Wendling wrote: > I'm a bit out of topic here, but all x11/qt5 binaries seem to segfault > at runtime with ports-gcc-4.9 on macppc - it just worked fine with > ports-gcc-8.2. Did you build qtbase with llvm? I did: ghostborough$ make -C

Re: x11/qt5/{qtgraphicaleffects,qtquickcontrols*} when not x86

2019-02-12 Thread Charlene Wendling
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 01:32:39 -0500 George Koehler wrote: > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 13:09:30 +0100 > Charlene Wendling wrote: > > > My change to SUBST_VARS made VERSION not being expanded, actually > > breaking packaging with the other x11/qt5 ports includig ${VERSION} > > in PLISTs. > > > > I'm

Re: x11/qt5/{qtgraphicaleffects,qtquickcontrols*} when not x86

2019-02-11 Thread George Koehler
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 13:09:30 +0100 Charlene Wendling wrote: > My change to SUBST_VARS made VERSION not being expanded, actually > breaking packaging with the other x11/qt5 ports includig ${VERSION} > in PLISTs. > > I'm joining a new diff that fixes that on my macppc and amd64 machines. Thank

Re: x11/qt5/{qtgraphicaleffects,qtquickcontrols*} when not x86

2019-02-07 Thread Landry Breuil
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 01:09:30PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:02:52 +0100 > Charlene Wendling wrote: > > > This hasn't been tested elsewhere that on macppc for now, and i needed > > to do a make clean=plist before make package. I can't guarantee it's > > perfect, but

Re: x11/qt5/{qtgraphicaleffects,qtquickcontrols*} when not x86

2019-02-07 Thread Charlene Wendling
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:02:52 +0100 Charlene Wendling wrote: > Hi! > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 00:02:15 -0500 > George Koehler wrote: > > > This mail is about the OpenBSD ports of > > - x11/qt5/qtgraphicaleffects > > - x11/qt5/qtquickcontrols > > - x11/qt5/qtquickcontrols2 > > > > These ports work

Re: x11/qt5/{qtgraphicaleffects,qtquickcontrols*} when not x86

2019-02-05 Thread Charlene Wendling
Hi! On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 00:02:15 -0500 George Koehler wrote: > This mail is about the OpenBSD ports of > - x11/qt5/qtgraphicaleffects > - x11/qt5/qtquickcontrols > - x11/qt5/qtquickcontrols2 > > These ports work on amd64 and i386, but are broken on aarch64, > powerpc, and probably other

x11/qt5/{qtgraphicaleffects,qtquickcontrols*} when not x86

2019-02-04 Thread George Koehler
This mail is about the OpenBSD ports of - x11/qt5/qtgraphicaleffects - x11/qt5/qtquickcontrols - x11/qt5/qtquickcontrols2 These ports work on amd64 and i386, but are broken on aarch64, powerpc, and probably other platforms. Each port has .qmlc files in its PLIST. Each port runs qmlcachegen