Is anyone working on a gcc52+ port? I know the reasons for gcc49 being the
latest available package, but I'd like to know whether it will be available in
the near future.
Regards.
--
Dan Andersen
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 05:16:39AM +0100, Dan Andersen wrote:
> Is anyone working on a gcc52+ port? I know the reasons for gcc49 being the
> latest available package, but I'd like to know whether it will be available
> in the near future.
There's a wip for gcc 6.2 in lang/gcc/6, but not yet link
Look at lang/gcc/6.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Dan Andersen wrote:
> Is anyone working on a gcc52+ port? I know the reasons for gcc49 being the
> latest available package, but I'd like to know whether it will be available
> in the near future.
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> Dan Andersen
>
>
--
A
I'm not going to commit an update to BIND 9.11.0 yet (ISC say, "We
recommend that administrators run one of our older, stable branches,
such as a 9.9 or 9.10-based release on larger-scale critical production
systems, while testing the new 9.11 branch until the second maintenance
release.") But for
Hi,
Here's an update that brings devel/dtc up to the latest version.
Cheers,
Daniel
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/dtc/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 Makefile
--- Makefile 19 Nov 2015 20:17:15
On 2016/10/14 12:39, Daniel Melani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's an update that brings devel/dtc up to the latest version.
Your diff is mangled.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:51:38AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/10/14 12:39, Daniel Melani wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here's an update that brings devel/dtc up to the latest version.
>
> Your diff is mangled.
>
Sorry about that. Let me try that again with a sane email client.
Index: M
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:47:10PM +0200, Daniel Melani wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:51:38AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2016/10/14 12:39, Daniel Melani wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Here's an update that brings devel/dtc up to the latest version.
> >
> > Your diff is mangled.
> >
Hi,
please find attached a port for pg_activity, a top like application for
PostgreSQL server activity monitoring
(https://github.com/julmon/pg_activity).
OK to import?
Best regards,
Ingo
pg_activity.tar.gz
Description: application/tar-gz
Hi,
this is my first port, i hope everything is fine.
A college of mine was using this tool to analyse some C code. I think this
tool is pretty interesting and can be put to good use for all sorts of programs
or parts of it.
COMMENT=Bounded Model Checker for C and C++ programs
# cat pkg
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 05:30:09PM +0200, Ingo Feinerer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please find attached a port for pg_activity, a top like application for
> PostgreSQL server activity monitoring
> (https://github.com/julmon/pg_activity).
>
> OK to import?
Nice, seems to work fine. Will have to test it on
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:03:55PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:47:10PM +0200, Daniel Melani wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:51:38AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2016/10/14 12:39, Daniel Melani wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Here's an update that br
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Alexander Bluhm
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My idea of the p5-BSD-arc4random port in OpenBSD is to keep the API
> of the BSD::arc4random Perl module, but use our libc functions
> internally. This has been done with BSD::arc4random::arc4random()
> a while ago, but BSD::arc4r
13 matches
Mail list logo