Re: Interest Bump - NEW: fd v8.1.1

2020-10-22 Thread Sebastien Marie
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 05:44:18PM +1100, Stephen Gregoratto wrote: > On 2020-10-19 10:05, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > Could you take maintainership of the port ? > > > > Personally, I am a bit reluctant to import a rust port if nobody want to > > maintain it, as it means I will need to do the

Re: Interest Bump - NEW: fd v8.1.1

2020-10-20 Thread Stephen Gregoratto
On 2020-10-19 10:05, Sebastien Marie wrote: > Could you take maintainership of the port ? > > Personally, I am a bit reluctant to import a rust port if nobody want to > maintain it, as it means I will need to do the work when it will break > due to compiler update. Sure, I can do that. > From

Re: Interest Bump - NEW: fd v8.1.1

2020-10-19 Thread Stephen Gregoratto
On 2020-10-13 14:42, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020/10/13 22:27, Stephen Gregoratto wrote: > > Would it be possible to get this merged before the 6.8 lock? I hope I'm > > not too late :(. The tarball is again attached. > > No chance whatsoever. > Now that the ports tree is unlocked, can this

Re: Interest Bump - NEW: fd v8.1.1

2020-10-19 Thread Sebastien Marie
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 05:44:31PM +1100, Stephen Gregoratto wrote: > On 2020-10-13 14:42, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2020/10/13 22:27, Stephen Gregoratto wrote: > > > Would it be possible to get this merged before the 6.8 lock? I hope I'm > > > not too late :(. The tarball is again attached.

Interest Bump - NEW: fd v8.1.1

2020-10-13 Thread Stephen Gregoratto
Would it be possible to get this merged before the 6.8 lock? I hope I'm not too late :(. The tarball is again attached. -- Stephen Gregoratto fd.tar.gz Description: application/gzip

Re: Interest Bump - NEW: fd v8.1.1

2020-10-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/10/13 22:27, Stephen Gregoratto wrote: > Would it be possible to get this merged before the 6.8 lock? I hope I'm > not too late :(. The tarball is again attached. No chance whatsoever.