On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:08:32 +0200
Solene Rapenne wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:52:11 +0200
> 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de>:
>
> > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:38:42 -0400
> > Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 05:30:43PM +0200, 3un0s wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:32:05 +01
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:52:11 +0200
3un0s <3u...@dismail.de>:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:38:42 -0400
> Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 05:30:43PM +0200, 3un0s wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:32:05 +0100
> > > Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > > I guess it does not wo
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 14:28:27 +0200
3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote:
> A new version of py-nbxmpp has been released since I've sent my last
> message.
>
> Important to note that this update breaks current version of gajim but
> I've already provided a diff for updating it to the current version.
>
A new version of py-nbxmpp has been released since I've sent my last
message.
Important to note that this update breaks current version of gajim but
I've already provided a diff for updating it to the current version.
I'm very sorry Pierre-Emmanuel Andre for not CCing you earlier, please
also tak
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:38:42 -0400
Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 05:30:43PM +0200, 3un0s wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:32:05 +0100
> > Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > > I guess it does not work with the existing gajim version? So
> > > committing must be done together.
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:32:05 +0100
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I guess it does not work with the existing gajim version? So
> committing must be done together.
I should write a new mail with both of those diffs together and subject
representing that two packages are updated then?
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 05:30:43PM +0200, 3un0s wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:32:05 +0100
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > I guess it does not work with the existing gajim version? So
> > committing must be done together.
> I should write a new mail with both of those diffs together and subject
On 2020/07/06 16:16, 3un0s wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As stated in my previous message I'm trying to get gajim 1.2 to work,
> and to do that py-nbxmpp had to be updated.
> I've actually tested it already with gajim 1.2 on amd64 and it works.
>
> Comments or OK ?
I guess it does not work with the existing
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 09:57:42AM +0200, Ingo Feinerer wrote:
> this updates net/py-nbxmpp to 0.6.10.
> Useful for the net/gajim update posted separately.
> OK?
This tested OK with the existing gajim for me on amd64.
I'd recommend removing the _CDROM from the PERMIT_PACKAGE line
while updating
On Fri Feb 09, 2018 at 03:33:36AM +0100, Peter Hessler wrote:
> $ gajim
> Gajim needs python-nbxmpp >= 0.6.1 to run. Quiting...
>
> OK?
>
Damn, I forgot the nbxmpp diff on the last gajim update. Same diff here,
ok rsadowski.
10 matches
Mail list logo