Re: update net/py-nbxmpp to 1.0.0

2020-08-15 Thread 3un0s
On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:08:32 +0200 Solene Rapenne wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:52:11 +0200 > 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de>: > > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:38:42 -0400 > > Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 05:30:43PM +0200, 3un0s wrote: > > > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:32:05 +01

Re: update net/py-nbxmpp to 1.0.0

2020-08-11 Thread Solene Rapenne
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:52:11 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de>: > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:38:42 -0400 > Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 05:30:43PM +0200, 3un0s wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:32:05 +0100 > > > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > > > I guess it does not wo

Re: update net/py-nbxmpp to 1.0.1

2020-08-10 Thread 3un0s
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 14:28:27 +0200 3un0s <3u...@dismail.de> wrote: > A new version of py-nbxmpp has been released since I've sent my last > message. > > Important to note that this update breaks current version of gajim but > I've already provided a diff for updating it to the current version. >

Re: update net/py-nbxmpp to 1.0.1

2020-07-12 Thread 3un0s
A new version of py-nbxmpp has been released since I've sent my last message. Important to note that this update breaks current version of gajim but I've already provided a diff for updating it to the current version. I'm very sorry Pierre-Emmanuel Andre for not CCing you earlier, please also tak

Re: update net/py-nbxmpp to 1.0.0

2020-07-06 Thread 3un0s
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:38:42 -0400 Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 05:30:43PM +0200, 3un0s wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:32:05 +0100 > > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > I guess it does not work with the existing gajim version? So > > > committing must be done together.

Re: update net/py-nbxmpp to 1.0.0

2020-07-06 Thread 3un0s
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:32:05 +0100 Stuart Henderson wrote: > I guess it does not work with the existing gajim version? So > committing must be done together. I should write a new mail with both of those diffs together and subject representing that two packages are updated then?

Re: update net/py-nbxmpp to 1.0.0

2020-07-06 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 05:30:43PM +0200, 3un0s wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:32:05 +0100 > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > I guess it does not work with the existing gajim version? So > > committing must be done together. > I should write a new mail with both of those diffs together and subject

Re: update net/py-nbxmpp to 1.0.0

2020-07-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/07/06 16:16, 3un0s wrote: > Hi, > > As stated in my previous message I'm trying to get gajim 1.2 to work, > and to do that py-nbxmpp had to be updated. > I've actually tested it already with gajim 1.2 on amd64 and it works. > > Comments or OK ? I guess it does not work with the existing

Re: UPDATE: net/py-nbxmpp

2019-06-15 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 09:57:42AM +0200, Ingo Feinerer wrote: > this updates net/py-nbxmpp to 0.6.10. > Useful for the net/gajim update posted separately. > OK? This tested OK with the existing gajim for me on amd64. I'd recommend removing the _CDROM from the PERMIT_PACKAGE line while updating

Re: [UPDATE] net/py-nbxmpp

2018-02-09 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Fri Feb 09, 2018 at 03:33:36AM +0100, Peter Hessler wrote: > $ gajim > Gajim needs python-nbxmpp >= 0.6.1 to run. Quiting... > > OK? > Damn, I forgot the nbxmpp diff on the last gajim update. Same diff here, ok rsadowski.