On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 13:28:44 -0400, sven falempin
wrote:
> If they build.
I've broken a couple of times ports and I can assure broken ports are
noticed quickly. Maybe you should consider fixing your system.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:10:20AM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Stuart Henderson
>> wrote:
>> > Is there any particular reason for building from source anyway?
>>
>>
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:10:20AM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Is there any particular reason for building from source anyway?
>
> Thank you for the pointers,
> i wanted to have a lighter version , and
> it is
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/04/04 09:18, Marc Espie wrote:
>>
>> First, your subject is misleading, you're talking about the port,
>> not the package.
>> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:31:47PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
>> > Fresh out of
On 2018/04/04 09:18, Marc Espie wrote:
>
> First, your subject is misleading, you're talking about the port,
> not the package.
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:31:47PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
> > Fresh out of the box.
>
>
> Builds here.
I've never had problems with this in bulk builds. I
First, your subject is misleading, you're talking about the port,
not the package.
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:31:47PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
> Fresh out of the box.
Builds here.
> /usr/ports/pobj/subversion-1.9.7/subversion-1.9.7/subversion/bindings/swig/proxy/svn_client_h.swg:196:
>