Re: 6.3 subversion package

2018-04-04 Thread Daniel Jakots
On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 13:28:44 -0400, sven falempin wrote: > If they build. I've broken a couple of times ports and I can assure broken ports are noticed quickly. Maybe you should consider fixing your system.

Re: 6.3 subversion package

2018-04-04 Thread sven falempin
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:10:20AM -0400, sven falempin wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Stuart Henderson >> wrote: >> > Is there any particular reason for building from source anyway? >> >>

Re: 6.3 subversion package

2018-04-04 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:10:20AM -0400, sven falempin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Is there any particular reason for building from source anyway? > > Thank you for the pointers, > i wanted to have a lighter version , and > it is

Re: 6.3 subversion package

2018-04-04 Thread sven falempin
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018/04/04 09:18, Marc Espie wrote: >> >> First, your subject is misleading, you're talking about the port, >> not the package. >> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:31:47PM -0400, sven falempin wrote: >> > Fresh out of

Re: 6.3 subversion package

2018-04-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/04/04 09:18, Marc Espie wrote: > > First, your subject is misleading, you're talking about the port, > not the package. > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:31:47PM -0400, sven falempin wrote: > > Fresh out of the box. > > > Builds here. I've never had problems with this in bulk builds. I

Re: 6.3 subversion package

2018-04-04 Thread Marc Espie
First, your subject is misleading, you're talking about the port, not the package. On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:31:47PM -0400, sven falempin wrote: > Fresh out of the box. Builds here. > /usr/ports/pobj/subversion-1.9.7/subversion-1.9.7/subversion/bindings/swig/proxy/svn_client_h.swg:196: >