On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:45:19 +0100
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> It's already committed.
>
Sorry for the noise, i may have not noticed something has gone wrong
during the initial tree fetch on this machine :(
> On 2018/08/10 15:19, Charlène wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 20:34:36 +0200
> > Jan
It's already committed.
On 2018/08/10 15:19, Charlène wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 20:34:36 +0200
> Jan Klemkow wrote:
>
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 06:31:53PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > On Thu Aug 02, 2018 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > > > Hi Rafael,
>
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 20:34:36 +0200
Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 06:31:53PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > On Thu Aug 02, 2018 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > > Hi Rafael,
> > >
> > > I also worked on an cmark port. I took your tar ball and fixed
> >
On 2018/08/02 20:34, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 06:31:53PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > On Thu Aug 02, 2018 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > > Hi Rafael,
> > >
> > > I also worked on an cmark port. I took your tar ball and fixed all
> > >
Hi Rafael,
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 06:31:53PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu Aug 02, 2018 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > I also worked on an cmark port. I took your tar ball and fixed all
> > comments Stuart pointed out. Just, the MAINTAINER field is
Hi Rafael,
I also worked on an cmark port. I took your tar ball and fixed all
comments Stuart pointed out. Just, the MAINTAINER field is still unset,
But, a portscheck run does not require this field.
I replaced the manual DISTFILE and MASTER_SITE handling by the GH_*
variables, moved it to
On 2018/08/02 18:31, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu Aug 02, 2018 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > I also worked on an cmark port. I took your tar ball and fixed all
> > comments Stuart pointed out. Just, the MAINTAINER field is still unset,
> > But, a portscheck
On Thu Aug 02, 2018 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> I also worked on an cmark port. I took your tar ball and fixed all
> comments Stuart pointed out. Just, the MAINTAINER field is still unset,
> But, a portscheck run does not require this field.
>
> I replaced the
On 2018/08/02 11:03, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> please find attached a small dependency for the upcoming
> multimedia/mkvtoolnix update. All tests are passed on amd64.
>
> pkg_info:
> Information for inst:cmark-0.28.3
>
> Comment:
> CommonMark parsing and rendering library and program