On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 1:59 AM Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2021/07/19 16:23, JR Aquino wrote:
> > Thanks David!
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback and the tweaks Stuart!
> >
> > I'll go back through to see what was missed on testing and come back to
> the
> > group with the edits. Could you
On 2021/07/19 16:23, JR Aquino wrote:
> Thanks David!
>
> Thanks for the feedback and the tweaks Stuart!
>
> I'll go back through to see what was missed on testing and come back to the
> group with the edits. Could you share the exact commands that failed for
> you on the package build on your
Thanks David!
Thanks for the feedback and the tweaks Stuart!
I'll go back through to see what was missed on testing and come back to the
group with the edits. Could you share the exact commands that failed for
you on the package build on your side just so that I'm able to reproduce
the exact
Generally I'm OK with this but have a few tweaks in the diff below.
Sync other patches, minor Makefile things, more explicit note about the
license, regenerate plist.
Note that 7.91 is the last release which can still be used under the
previous license, I would like someone with a better eye on
Hi
No problem to pass it on to you :-), my interest towards nmap had
shifted anyway.
Kind regards.
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 16:19, JR Aquino wrote:
>
> Attached patch updates nmap from 7.80 to the current 7.91.
>
> In addition to the port languishing updates since 2019, there is also an
>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:19:27PM -0700, Peter Valchev wrote:
Why did you make these changes? pcap_get_selectable_fd() is in our
libpcap and removing that patch still seems to work in general though
I haven't looked to see what it affects... you patched it though,
so hence the question?
If
Nmap updated to 4.20 version, it seems to work even with OpenBSD's libpcap.
Tested on i386.
Can you not GZIP the diffs that you send in the future please?
in your patch-tcpip.cc
--- tcpip.cc.orig Sun Feb 4 16:06:01 2007
+++ tcpip.ccSun Feb 4 16:08:26 2007
@@ -99,6 +99,8 @@