On 2018/03/14 18:08, George Rosamond wrote:
> Stuart Henderson:
> > unsure about no/, it was there before and intentionally removed ..
> >
> > -
> > PatchSet 24
> > Date: 2004/04/08 06:27:11
> > Author: jolan
> > Branch: HEAD
> > Tag: (none)
> > Log:
> > appears to be deprecated by nb/nn dictionaries
> >
> > Members:
> > no/Makefile:1.1->1.2(DEAD)
> > no/distinfo:1.2->1.3(DEAD)
> > no/pkg/DESCR:1.1->1.2(DEAD)
> > no/pkg/PLIST:1.1->1.2(DEAD)
> >
> > -
> >
> > If it is actually useful, it will want a REVISION bump to take it past
> > the ports version number we had before.
> >
>
> dicts/no removed with Makefile change.
>
> in dicts/Makefile:
>
> REVISION = 0
>
> clumped GPL licenses together.
>
> Attached aspell/dicts hier in tarball.
>
> g
>
>
the REVISION bump isn't quite right, several subdirs are already on
REVISION=0 and would need bumping beyond that (the new ones don't
need REVISION=0 though it doesn't hurt).
also should be ?= not = if it's in Makefile.inc, but then putting it
there is a a surefire way to cause problems next time someone updates,
it'd be better to bump the subdir Makefiles instead.
so I would remove the new REVISION from Makefile.inc and add to each
already-existing subdir.
the copyright types should go in the subdir's too to make it clear
which package is under which license ...
it would be easier to handle the update if *only* the new directories
were in the tar:
tar czf /tmp/aspell-dicts.tgz `cvs up | awk '/^\?/ { print $2 }'`
and send a diff for the changes to existing files.
