Re: lang/go-bootstrap: Makefile improvements

2018-05-05 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:14:20AM +1000, Joel Sing wrote: > On Saturday 07 April 2018 01:04:59 Klemens Nanni wrote: > > Same thing as with lang/go: Simplify do-install, combine finds, > > fix space/tab mixtures. > > > > Feedback? OK? Updated diff after feedback from jsing@. OK? > > +GOBIN =

Re: lang/go-bootstrap: Makefile improvements

2018-04-18 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 01:04:59AM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote: > Same thing as with lang/go: Simplify do-install, combine finds, > fix space/tab mixtures. > > Feedback? OK? Bump. Index: Makefile === RCS file:

Re: [lang/go-bootstrap] Switch to go1.4 release tarball

2017-10-10 Thread Joel Sing
On Tuesday 10 October 2017 09:53:43 Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2017/10/09 03:34, Joel Sing wrote: > > Upstream is providing a tarball of the release-branch.go1.4 git branch, > > which contains minor fixes to keep Go 1.4 building on current platforms. > > Most of the patches that we currently

Re: [lang/go-bootstrap] Switch to go1.4 release tarball

2017-10-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/10/09 03:34, Joel Sing wrote: > Upstream is providing a tarball of the release-branch.go1.4 git branch, > which contains minor fixes to keep Go 1.4 building on current platforms. > Most of the patches that we currently have for lang/go-bootstrap have > been committed upstream - one of

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-25 Thread Joel Sing
On Wednesday 23 December 2015 03:02:25 Joel Sing wrote: > On Wednesday 09 December 2015 00:40:28 Joel Sing wrote: > > I'll rework go.port.mk and the relevant packages using /usr/local/go-pkg. > > This reworks go.port.mk to install packages in /usr/local/go-pkg and builds > without -a, -work and

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-22 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Joel Sing said: > I don't want to patch /usr/local/go-pkg into the default $GOPATH - that would > likely create a bunch of "oh, why is it behaving like that" problems. We > could > tell people to add it to their Go path if they want to use it, but I'm > tempted > to only use it for port build

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-22 Thread Joel Sing
On Wednesday 09 December 2015 00:40:28 Joel Sing wrote: > I'll rework go.port.mk and the relevant packages using /usr/local/go-pkg. This reworks go.port.mk to install packages in /usr/local/go-pkg and builds without -a, -work and without running things through sed and piping to shell. The

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-22 Thread Joel Sing
On Thursday 10 December 2015 17:50:20 Michael McConville wrote: > Joel Sing wrote: > > Thanks for clarlifying - we could still implement 'go get -d' as a way > > of getting sources, but it would be more work than it is likely worth > > (and there are also some issues surrounding which versions of

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-22 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Joel Sing said: > This reworks go.port.mk to install packages in /usr/local/go-pkg and builds > without -a, -work and without running things through sed and piping to shell. > The net/websocketd and textproc/go-xlsx should now be fixed (along with > their dependencies) - I still need to take a

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-10 Thread Michael McConville
Joel Sing wrote: > Thanks for clarlifying - we could still implement 'go get -d' as a way > of getting sources, but it would be more work than it is likely worth > (and there are also some issues surrounding which versions of the > dependencies get fetched). > > I'll rework go.port.mk and the

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-08 Thread Joel Sing
On Monday 07 December 2015 23:31:34 Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015/12/08 10:05, Joel Sing wrote: > > On Monday 07 December 2015 14:18:52 Kent R. Spillner wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:29:03AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote: > > > > This brings me to the next issue/topic - installing

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-07 Thread Joel Sing
On Sunday 06 December 2015 16:44:33 Stuart Henderson wrote: > Slight problem with the go update, it breaks build of some ports using > the go module: > > textproc/go-xlsx > net/go-websocket > devel/go-check-v1 > devel/go-tools I obviously did not get to look carefully at r1.2 of go.port.mk -

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-07 Thread Kent R. Spillner
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:29:03AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote: > This brings me to the next issue/topic - installing additional packages under > /usr/local/go is probably a bad idea. My recollection is that the other issues you mentioned were necessary in order to make this work. So if everyone

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-07 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Joel Sing said: > I obviously did not get to look carefully at r1.2 of go.port.mk - there are a > number of issues that should be resolved: > > - Running 'go install -x' and piping the results through sed and sh -v is > crazy. Firstly, 'go install -x' will *run* those commands, then they're

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/12/08 10:05, Joel Sing wrote: > On Monday 07 December 2015 14:18:52 Kent R. Spillner wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:29:03AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote: > > > This brings me to the next issue/topic - installing additional packages > > > under /usr/local/go is probably a bad idea. > > >

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
Slight problem with the go update, it breaks build of some ports using the go module: textproc/go-xlsx net/go-websocket devel/go-check-v1 devel/go-tools

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-06 Thread Michael McConville
Michael McConville wrote: > Michael McConville wrote: > > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > Slight problem with the go update, it breaks build of some ports using > > > the go module: > > > > > > textproc/go-xlsx > > > net/go-websocket > > > devel/go-check-v1 > > > devel/go-tools > > > > I'm working

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/12/06 13:50, Michael McConville wrote: > Also, make update-plist isn't recognizing the rc script for me. It says: > > > make-plist: Bogus element outside of every prefix: /etc/rc.d/godoc You need to re-add this manually, update-plist doesn't handle rc scripts. > -@comment $OpenBSD:

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-06 Thread Michael McConville
Stuart Henderson wrote: > Slight problem with the go update, it breaks build of some ports using > the go module: > > textproc/go-xlsx > net/go-websocket > devel/go-check-v1 > devel/go-tools I'm working on an update for go-tools. We have a manual install command for cover and vet, but the

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-06 Thread Michael McConville
Michael McConville wrote: > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Slight problem with the go update, it breaks build of some ports using > > the go module: > > > > textproc/go-xlsx > > net/go-websocket > > devel/go-check-v1 > > devel/go-tools > > I'm working on an update for go-tools. > > We have a

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-04 Thread Adam Wolk
On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 19:41:35 +0100 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 03:07:01AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote: > > From Go 1.5 onwards, an existing go compiler is needed to bootstrap > > the build (the runtime is now written in Go, rather than C) - the > >

Re: lang/go-bootstrap

2015-12-03 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 03:07:01AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote: > From Go 1.5 onwards, an existing go compiler is needed to bootstrap the build > (the runtime is now written in Go, rather than C) - the current "promise" is > that the bootstrap will only use functionality from the Go 1.4 API. > > So