Re: UPDATE: mail/isync 1.2.1 to 1.2.2

2017-08-10 Thread Daniel Jakots
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 10:07:34 +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote: > Does anyone want to commit this? Thanks, committed!

Re: UPDATE: mail/isync 1.2.1 to 1.2.2

2017-08-10 Thread David Coppa
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Daniel Jakots wrote: > On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 02:53:59 +0200, Klemens Nanni > wrote: > >> > I'm not entirely sure yet whether the introduced patch to get >> > X509_OBJECT_get0_X509() and X509_STORE_get0_objects() working is the

Re: UPDATE: mail/isync 1.2.1 to 1.2.2

2017-08-10 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 11:33:09PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote: > On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 02:53:59 +0200, Klemens Nanni > wrote: > > > > I'm not entirely sure yet whether the introduced patch to get > > > X509_OBJECT_get0_X509() and X509_STORE_get0_objects() working is the > > > way

Re: UPDATE: mail/isync 1.2.1 to 1.2.2

2017-08-09 Thread Daniel Jakots
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 02:53:59 +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > I'm not entirely sure yet whether the introduced patch to get > > X509_OBJECT_get0_X509() and X509_STORE_get0_objects() working is the > > way to go, maybe someone more knowledgable about OpenSSL internals > > can

Re: UPDATE: mail/isync 1.2.1 to 1.2.2

2017-08-09 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 01:17:07AM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 06:53:47PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 23:58:33 +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > > > > Other than that a trivial version bump suffices > > > > Then can you please send

Re: UPDATE: mail/isync 1.2.1 to 1.2.2

2017-08-09 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 06:53:47PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote: > On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 23:58:33 +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > > Other than that a trivial version bump suffices > > Then can you please send a diff rather than a .tgz? I sent a tarball since the new patch wouldn't

Re: UPDATE: mail/isync 1.2.1 to 1.2.2

2017-08-09 Thread Daniel Jakots
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 23:58:33 +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote: > Other than that a trivial version bump suffices Then can you please send a diff rather than a .tgz? Cheers, Daniel

UPDATE: mail/isync 1.2.1 to 1.2.2

2017-08-09 Thread Klemens Nanni
1.2.1 is over two years old, 1.2.2 was released this week. I'm not entirely sure yet whether the introduced patch to get X509_OBJECT_get0_X509() and X509_STORE_get0_objects() working is the way to go, maybe someone more knowledgable about OpenSSL internals can comment/fix this? Other than that a