On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 10:07:34 +0200, Klemens Nanni
wrote:
> Does anyone want to commit this?
Thanks, committed!
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 02:53:59 +0200, Klemens Nanni
> wrote:
>
>> > I'm not entirely sure yet whether the introduced patch to get
>> > X509_OBJECT_get0_X509() and X509_STORE_get0_objects() working is the
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 11:33:09PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 02:53:59 +0200, Klemens Nanni
> wrote:
>
> > > I'm not entirely sure yet whether the introduced patch to get
> > > X509_OBJECT_get0_X509() and X509_STORE_get0_objects() working is the
> > > way
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 02:53:59 +0200, Klemens Nanni
wrote:
> > I'm not entirely sure yet whether the introduced patch to get
> > X509_OBJECT_get0_X509() and X509_STORE_get0_objects() working is the
> > way to go, maybe someone more knowledgable about OpenSSL internals
> > can
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 01:17:07AM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 06:53:47PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 23:58:33 +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> >
> > > Other than that a trivial version bump suffices
> >
> > Then can you please send
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 06:53:47PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 23:58:33 +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>
> > Other than that a trivial version bump suffices
>
> Then can you please send a diff rather than a .tgz?
I sent a tarball since the new patch wouldn't
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 23:58:33 +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Other than that a trivial version bump suffices
Then can you please send a diff rather than a .tgz?
Cheers,
Daniel
1.2.1 is over two years old, 1.2.2 was released this week.
I'm not entirely sure yet whether the introduced patch to get
X509_OBJECT_get0_X509() and X509_STORE_get0_objects() working is the way
to go, maybe someone more knowledgable about OpenSSL internals can
comment/fix this?
Other than that a