Re: UPDATE: security/gpgme

2022-08-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/08/29 14:23, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > Yes but I ran `make update-plist`: So don't do that? :) > > diff --git a/security/ruby-gpgme/Makefile b/security/ruby-gpgme/Makefile > index b35bc98e290..c616cf1e416 100644 > --- a/security/ruby-gpgme/Makefile > +++ b/security/ruby-gpgme/Makefile

Re: UPDATE: security/gpgme

2022-08-29 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Mon Aug 29, 2022 at 01:19:59PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2022/08/29 14:10, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > > I caught a victim. ruby-gpgme ruby30 and ruby31 packaged fine but not > > ruby27: > > > > Error: > >

Re: UPDATE: security/gpgme

2022-08-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/08/29 14:10, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > I caught a victim. ruby-gpgme ruby30 and ruby31 packaged fine but not > ruby27: > > Error: > /usr/ports/pobj/gpgme-2.0.20-ruby27/fake-amd64-ruby27/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.7/gems/gpgme-2.0.20/ports/archives/gpgme-1.12.0.tar.bz2 > does not exist

Re: UPDATE: security/gpgme

2022-08-29 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Sun Aug 28, 2022 at 11:13:15AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2022/08/28 10:50, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > Update gpgme to 1.18.0, OK? > > I have this in my tree but haven't got round to testing dependent ports yet > > > diff --git a/security/gpgme/Makefile b/security/gpgme/Makefile > >

Re: UPDATE: security/gpgme

2022-08-28 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/08/28 10:50, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Update gpgme to 1.18.0, OK? I have this in my tree but haven't got round to testing dependent ports yet > diff --git a/security/gpgme/Makefile b/security/gpgme/Makefile > index c7934381aa8..aeea514a306 100644 > --- a/security/gpgme/Makefile > +++

UPDATE: security/gpgme

2022-08-28 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Update gpgme to 1.18.0, OK? diff --git a/security/gpgme/Makefile b/security/gpgme/Makefile index c7934381aa8..aeea514a306 100644 --- a/security/gpgme/Makefile +++ b/security/gpgme/Makefile @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ COMMENT-main = GnuPG Made Easy COMMENT-qt = Qt bindings for GPGme

Re: [Update] security/gpgme to v1.13.1

2019-08-01 Thread Stefan Hagen
Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2019/07/31 20:49, Stefan Hagen wrote: This is an update for security/gpgme from v1.12.0 to 1.13.1. Committed with tweaks. Thank you. A function was removed so we bump the major version. (It may possibly be an internal-only function, but we generally bump for

Re: [Update] security/gpgme to v1.13.1 (with question)

2019-08-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/07/31 20:49, Stefan Hagen wrote: > Hello, > > This is an update for security/gpgme from v1.12.0 to 1.13.1. Committed with tweaks. > I did not increase the SHARED_LIBS counter. I think this is ok as I > understand from bsd.port.mk(5), that shared_libs are being increased by > global port

[Update] security/gpgme to v1.13.1 (with question)

2019-07-31 Thread Stefan Hagen
Hello, This is an update for security/gpgme from v1.12.0 to 1.13.1. Changes from 1.12.0 to 1.13.0 (https://dev.gnupg.org/T4376): * Support GPGME_AUDITLOG_DIAG for gpgsm. * New context flag "trust-model". * Removed support for WindowsCE and Windows ME. * Aligned the gpgrt-config code with our

Re: UPDATE security/gpgme (...and the whole impact)

2018-03-27 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Mon Mar 26, 2018 at 06:25:06PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > We are working on 6.3 release at the moment, please ping again when we're > done with that. Of course pre 6.3 release. The diff below was missing a PLIST regen in pimlibs, spotted by eagle eye landry@. New diff:

Re: UPDATE security/gpgme (...and the whole impact)

2018-03-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
We are working on 6.3 release at the moment, please ping again when we're done with that. On 2018/03/26 16:59, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi All, > > hopefully the last gpgme mail thread for this year [1] [2]. This E-Mail > is for the sake of clarity. Please find below the final diff to update >

UPDATE security/gpgme (...and the whole impact)

2018-03-26 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Hi All, hopefully the last gpgme mail thread for this year [1] [2]. This E-Mail is for the sake of clarity. Please find below the final diff to update gpgme to 1.10.0 which also includes a FLAVOR to replace x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp. A list of all changes: - Bump all consumers because the

Re: NEW: security/qgpgme; Update security/gpgme, mail/trojita; remove: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp

2018-03-20 Thread Landry Breuil
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:43:41PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I think this one is post-release. So, definitely post-release. You'll also need to bump all gpgme consumers, since they all fail to package because the dependency changes: -@depend security/gpgme:gpgme-*:gpgme-1.9.0p0 +@depend

Re: UPDATE security/gpgme

2018-03-19 Thread Landry Breuil
with 'make test', or while build testing numerous consumers. > > > > rsadowski has a larger diff to update and add qgpgme, that I or someone > > else needs to look at .. (subject "Re: NEW: security/qgpgme; Update > > security/gpgme, mail/trojita; remove: x11/kde-appl

Re: UPDATE security/gpgme

2018-03-19 Thread Rafael Sadowski
ski has a larger diff to update and add qgpgme, that I or someone > else needs to look at .. (subject "Re: NEW: security/qgpgme; Update > security/gpgme, mail/trojita; remove: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp") > Maybe something for pre 6.3? This diff includes a fix spotted by landry@ in a

Re: NEW: security/qgpgme; Update security/gpgme, mail/trojita; remove: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp

2018-03-18 Thread Stuart Henderson
I think this one is post-release. On 2018/03/18 10:07, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 08:13:03PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > On Sun Feb 25, 2018 at 05:56:50PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > > > > > > Please find below a new diff which includes a (q)gpgme as FLAVOR.

Re: NEW: security/qgpgme; Update security/gpgme, mail/trojita; remove: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp

2018-03-18 Thread Landry Breuil
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 08:13:03PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Sun Feb 25, 2018 at 05:56:50PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > > > > Please find below a new diff which includes a (q)gpgme as FLAVOR. All > > > consumers build and package fine on amd64. > > > > > > I got positive

Re: NEW: security/qgpgme; Update security/gpgme, mail/trojita; remove: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp

2018-03-05 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Sun Feb 25, 2018 at 05:56:50PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > > Please find below a new diff which includes a (q)gpgme as FLAVOR. All > > consumers build and package fine on amd64. > > > > I got positive feedback from Caspar Schutijser (trojita mainatiner). > > > > Ok? > > > Updated

Re: NEW: security/qgpgme; Update security/gpgme, mail/trojita; remove: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp

2018-02-25 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Wed Feb 21, 2018 at 04:37:02PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Fri Feb 16, 2018 at 11:57:44AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2018/02/16 07:33, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > tl;dr: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp is dead upstream. Long live > > > security/qgpgme. > > >

Re: UPDATE security/gpgme

2018-02-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
ct "Re: NEW: security/qgpgme; Update security/gpgme, mail/trojita; remove: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp")

UPDATE security/gpgme

2018-02-23 Thread Björn Ketelaars
Enclosed a diff for bringing gpgme to the latest version [0]. No issues found with 'make test', or while build testing numerous consumers. OK? [0] https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gpgme.git;a=blob_plain;f=NEWS;hb=6a42eb5f3809d5eb3767667c190b395d028886e7 Index: Makefile

Re: NEW: security/qgpgme; Update security/gpgme, mail/trojita; remove: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp

2018-02-21 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Fri Feb 16, 2018 at 11:57:44AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018/02/16 07:33, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > tl;dr: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp is dead upstream. Long live > > security/qgpgme. > > > > Since Sep. 2016[1] the C++ bindings for GnuPG's GPGME library and > >

Re: NEW: security/qgpgme; Update security/gpgme, mail/trojita; remove: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp

2018-02-17 Thread Caspar Schutijser
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:57:44AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > 2.) trojita_qgpgme.diff > > Patch trojita to play with qgpgme from GPGME based on the idea from > > archlinux[3]. Tested on amd64. All tests are green. > > Is there any chance of upstream adopting these patches? (not a show >

Re: NEW: security/qgpgme; Update security/gpgme, mail/trojita; remove: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp

2018-02-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/02/17 13:03, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Fri Feb 16, 2018 at 11:57:44AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > I'd be happier with this being part of a single gpgme port if the > > compiler settings thing can be fixed as above. Apart from anything > > else these fixed-version dependencies make

Re: NEW: security/qgpgme; Update security/gpgme, mail/trojita; remove: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp

2018-02-17 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Fri Feb 16, 2018 at 11:57:44AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018/02/16 07:33, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > tl;dr: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp is dead upstream. Long live > > security/qgpgme. > > > > Since Sep. 2016[1] the C++ bindings for GnuPG's GPGME library and > >

Re: NEW: security/qgpgme; Update security/gpgme, mail/trojita; remove: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp

2018-02-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/02/16 07:33, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi All, > > tl;dr: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp is dead upstream. Long live > security/qgpgme. > > Since Sep. 2016[1] the C++ bindings for GnuPG's GPGME library and > the Qt Job API for GpgME++ (QGpgME) is part of the GPGME repository. > > It wasn't

NEW: security/qgpgme; Update security/gpgme, mail/trojita; remove: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp

2018-02-15 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Hi All, tl;dr: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp is dead upstream. Long live security/qgpgme. Since Sep. 2016[1] the C++ bindings for GnuPG's GPGME library and the Qt Job API for GpgME++ (QGpgME) is part of the GPGME repository. It wasn't a good idea to make an FLAVOR in security/gpgme; discussed

UPDATE: security/gpgme

2016-09-04 Thread Edd Barrett
Update to latest gpgme. >From diffing the headers from our old package and this, it seems a few bits of the interface have changed. Here are the dependencies: devel/kf5/kwallet mail/claws-mail,-main mail/claws-mail,ldap,-main mail/mutt,gpgme mail/sylpheed net/centerim net/mcabber net/profanity

update: security/gpgme

2007-12-15 Thread Simon Bertrang
Hi, this is an update of security/gpgme to version 1.1.5, tested on amd64, i386 and macppc without any regressions. If you could have a look, test - or even better - ok the patch that would be great. Regards, Simon Index: Makefile

Re: update: security/gpgme

2007-12-15 Thread Will Maier
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 08:57:09PM +0100, Simon Bertrang wrote: this is an update of security/gpgme to version 1.1.5, tested on amd64, i386 and macppc without any regressions. Tests pass on i386 here. -- o--{ Will Maier }--o |

Re: UPDATE: security/gpgme

2005-11-23 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:36:36 +0100 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:45:00 +0100 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: grrr, the previous diffs updated security/gpgme to an outdated version (1.0.3). Here's the diff that brings

Re: UPDATE: security/gpgme

2005-11-22 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:40:11 +0100 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Index: pkg/PLIST === RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/gpgme/pkg/PLIST,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.4 PLIST --- pkg/PLIST 14 Feb