Re: [posted] Posted (#21565, Marx) !

2014-01-04 Thread David Widger
I will take #21565 for my next production. David At 12:12 AM 1/4/2014, Greg Newby wrote: Thanks for this, John. We had not noticed citizenship of the translator when we did the clearance. I agree there is insufficient evidence to maintain that this is public domain in the US. I have

Re: [posted] Posted (#21565, Marx) !

2014-01-03 Thread Greg Newby
Thanks for this, John. We had not noticed citizenship of the translator when we did the clearance. I agree there is insufficient evidence to maintain that this is public domain in the US. I have UNposted this item. David, or another WW'er, would you please make use of the number for a

Re: [posted] Posted (#21565, Marx) !

2014-01-02 Thread John Mark Ockerbloom
Does anyone have detailed publication history on this one? I'm afraid it is likely to be still under copyright in the US, due to a GATT restoration. (Stenning was British, and appears to have lived into the 1950s at least, based on the output of his translations. This one seems to have come