On Mon, August 25, 2008 8:32 am, Stefan Palme said:
this is a question not exactly postfix related: When a mail server
is about to send a bounce message to the original sender of an
undeliverable mail - which address will this bounce be sent to?
The Return-Path? The address from the From
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 08:54:40AM CEST, Magnus Bäck [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, August 25, 2008 8:32 am, Stefan Palme said:
this is a question not exactly postfix related: When a mail server
is about to send a bounce message to the original sender of an
undeliverable mail - which
Hello all.
I've set up some spam protection stuffs in my email server (postfix).
Postfix is running correctly, amavisd-new is also working with clamav.
Bu I have doubt with spamassassin. To check my spam protection I've
forwarded my SPAM messages from gmail to a new server, but it gets in
to
this is a question not exactly postfix related: When a mail server
is about to send a bounce message to the original sender of an
undeliverable mail - which address will this bounce be sent to?
The Return-Path? The address from the From header?
Or even to the Reply-To address?
Stefan Palme wrote:
this is a question not exactly postfix related: When a mail server
is about to send a bounce message to the original sender of an
undeliverable mail - which address will this bounce be sent to?
The Return-Path? The address from the From header?
Or even to the Reply-To
Erwan David wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 08:54:40AM CEST, Magnus Bäck [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, August 25, 2008 8:32 am, Stefan Palme said:
this is a question not exactly postfix related: When a mail server
is about to send a bounce message to the original sender of an
undeliverable
Neil wrote:
Is there a way I can instruct Postfix to accept incoming mail (external
and internal), but not to deliver it/pass the mails on to their
respective destinations?
Yes, see http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#defer_transports and
also
Stefan Palme wrote:
Hello,
a little bit off topic - but maybe someone can comment this...
We are running a website where users can register themself, use
features like send this page to a friend etc. Those features
make the web application send an email to a user. The from
addresses (envelope
Neil wrote:
Is there a way I can instruct Postfix to accept incoming mail (external and
internal), but not to deliver it/pass the mails on to their respective
destinations?
it is not clear which mail you are about. I guess it is about mail
received via smtp. if so, use HOLD in a restriction:
Hi,
I'm seeing a strange behavior where smtpd_recipient_restrictions are being
applied to mail received over the network but not to mail sent from local unix
mail ( or from squirrelmail which is using /usr/bin/sendmail ).
The intention is to prevent anyone from emailing a specific address.
I want the From address to be set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A mail sent to this address will cause no error, but nobody will
read those emails.
That is a very very bad idea and the best way to have your server added to
many RBLs.
You want to look at and process all bounce messages
I want the From address to be set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A mail sent to this address will cause no error, but nobody will
read those emails.
That is a very very bad idea and the best way to have your server added to
many RBLs.
You want to look at and process all bounce
I had success on setting up dkim-milter with postfix. Now I want to
try SPF thing. But should I use SPF through milter or policy server?
Which one is best? Cons and pros?
--
Regards
Dulmandakh
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Aaron D. Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm seeing a strange behavior where smtpd_recipient_restrictions are
being applied to mail received over the network but not to mail sent
from local unix mail ( or from squirrelmail which is using
/usr/bin/sendmail ).
On this special server the one and only client is the web application,
where anonymous users can use a web form to ask for an account. They
have to fill in their email address. The web application sends a
mail to this address with a dynamically generated link the user has
to follow to really
DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar schrieb:
I had success on setting up dkim-milter with postfix. Now I want to
try SPF thing. But should I use SPF through milter or policy server?
Which one is best? Cons and pros?
i just upgraded
to
http://www.openspf.org/blobs/postfix-policyd-spf-perl-2.007.tar.gz
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
sendmail != smtpd
thus smtpd_recipient_restrictions don't apply
understood. Nonetheless, do you know of a way to prevent users from
using sendmail to send to a particular recipient, besides an ugly hack
like aliasing the recipient to /dev/null or something?
Stefan Palme wrote:
Hmmm. Maybe I did not understand you, or you me... ;-)
I want the From address to be set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A mail sent to this address will cause no error, but nobody will
read those emails.
The Reply-To-address will become a really existing address which
Stefan Palme wrote:
I want the From address to be set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A mail sent to this address will cause no error, but nobody will
read those emails.
That is a very very bad idea and the best way to have your server added to
many RBLs.
You want to look at and process
Wietse Venema wrote:
To apply smtpd_recipient_restrictions when mail arrives via the
/usr/bin/sendmail command, this solution was posted a few days ago:
To force sendmail command-line submissions through the SMTP server,
use this:
Thank you.
On 8/25/2008, Aaron D. Bennett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
html_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.1.4-documentation/html
readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.0.16/README_FILES
sample_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.0.16/samples
So what version is this?
2.0.16? 2.1.4? Something
On 8/25/2008 11:48 AM, Aaron Bennett wrote:
So what version is this?
2.0.16? 2.1.4? Something else?
If either of those, you really should upgrade...
no it's 2.3.2, those config statements are just cruft from a few upgrades.
Still old and worth upgrading...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Thanks for all your answers. My first approach to just throw
away all bounces caused by senseless data entered into a web
form is obviously too naive ;-)
I guess I will go the way to collect bounces by a script and
establish an smtpd_recipient_restrictions based on this list
of bouncing
Ralf Hildebrandt:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
* Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Aaron D. Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm seeing a strange behavior where smtpd_recipient_restrictions are
being applied to mail received over the
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
Hi,
Someone could give me some documentation that talk of errors 4xx of the
Postfix?
I'm with an error between the amavis and Postfix, making you amavis
generate the following log:
(25680-09-30) Blocked TEMPFAIL
And according to some users from amavis, this is a
Stefan Palme:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
Thanks for all your answers. My first approach to just throw
away all bounces caused by senseless data entered into a web
form is obviously too naive ;-)
I guess I will go the way to collect bounces by a script and
establish an
Hi,
I have read several how-to on the network about blocking spam using Postfix.
Most of them spoke on block messages directly into session SMTP or using
blacklists.
Someone I could pass a general documentation how do this in the Postfix?
I lost half the sea of tutorials and official
Instead of adding an ever-increasing list of features to Postfix
(or throwing in a Turing-complete scripting language) I decided
around 2000 to allow people to plug stuff into Postfix: content
filters, policy daemons, and Milter applications.
This is absolutely ok - I've just asked to be
* Marcel Grandemange [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aug 25 15:31:21 thavinci postfix/smtpd[77983]: fatal: open database
/usr/local/etc/postfix/pop-before-smtp.db: Invalid argument
postfix doesn't understand the DB format the pop before smtp proces
writes.
That's it.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL
* Marcel Grandemange [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why? It used to work without hitch
What could cause this?
Different BDB libs for postfix and the pop before smtp process (which
one is it?)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:50:44 +0200
Marcel Grandemange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do entirely agree with you're statement however we have many MANY
clients that have been with us a while and because they are all
remote and not always IT literate, its easier implementing what
worked and add the
Sorry for the slightly noob question here, but here goes.
Our company started really small, and as such, we had our mail hosted by
network solutions (yuck, I know). As we grew, I suggested and got approvak
to build us a mail server on BSD running Postfix. It works great, and I now
want to
Hello, everyone.
I thought before I potential reinvent the wheel, I would ask here if
someone hasn't done this before:
I am looking at doing 3 things in postfix on a relay which is set as the
smart relay on a number of machines.
1.) Check the client host name, if in table 1, allow relay
33 matches
Mail list logo
