Hi,
is there a builtin way to make postfix remember bouncing recipient
addresses, so that further attempts to send mails to those addresses
can be rejected?
I do NOT want to use active recipient address verification. I only want
to save when a real mail delivery attempt fails - so this seems to
* Jie Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello, everyone,
I have a box running 2.2.3 and encounter the following problem.
The box is behind a firewall (ISA), and is under attack frequently ( a
lots of SMTP connections).
Who says that it's an attack.
When there are a lot of SMTP connection requests
Ralf, thanks for the quick response.
Surely I will use multi recipients.
I supposed the postfix will send a separate copy to each recipient.
for instance：if i have two recipients, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED],
they
are in different ISP, so postfix will transfer two times, once for the
* shawn D.Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ralf, thanks for the quick response.
Surely I will use multi recipients.
I supposed the postfix will send a separate copy to each recipient.
No, not with multi-recipient mail.
for instance：if i have two recipients, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL
wow, that 's great! big day...
thank you so much :)
you are a very very good people, thanks :)
On 8/29/08, Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* shawn D.Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ralf, thanks for the quick response.
Surely I will use multi recipients.
I supposed the postfix will
Hi,
the following SMTP sessions works:
--
telnet localhost 25
...
EHLO localhost
...
MAIL FROM: root
250 2.1.0 Ok
RCPT TO: root
250 2.1.5 Ok
DATA
354 End data with CRLF.CRLF
To: root
From: root
Subject: test
.
250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 1FE944A4078
But what makes postfix accept the non-fully-qualified envelope
sender and recipient addresses? I don't want to allow this,
I want to enforce MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc...
Ah sorry, found the problem in my smtpd_recipient_restrictions:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
Stefan Palme:
Hi all,
Today seems to be postfix day, so sorry for the bulk of questions ;-)
When I receive a mail with only ONE envelope recipient, postfix
inserts a mail header of the form
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
mail.mydomain.com (Postfix) with
Is there a way to enforce postfix to always insert a from ... part
on its Received: header?
Of course I meant for... part...
No, that would violate the privacy of BCC recipients.
Why? The normal recipient (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) would get a mail with
Received: from ... by
Hi all,
Today seems to be postfix day, so sorry for the bulk of questions ;-)
When I receive a mail with only ONE envelope recipient, postfix
inserts a mail header of the form
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
mail.mydomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F335A4A4084 for
Hi,
I have used the following make command with 2.5.1 successfully in the past:
make -f Makefile.init makefiles CCARGS=-I/usr/include
-I/usr/include/mysql -I/usr/include/openssl -I/usr/include/sasl
-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -DHAS_LDAP -DHAS_MYSQL
-DHAS_PGSQL -DUSE_TLS
Stefan Palme:
Is there a way to enforce postfix to always insert a from ... part
on its Received: header?
Of course I meant for... part...
No, that would violate the privacy of BCC recipients.
Why? The normal recipient (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) would get a mail with
You were
Rob Kelledy:
I have a bunch of mail being deferring with no available mx (mainly
typos).
What is the result of:
$ host -t mx example.com
$ host -t a example.com
With a suitable substitution for example.com.
If the DNS server says that BOTH the MX and A records don't exist,
Postfix will
Wieste,
Thanks for the question - it turned out that an update to the yum
repository location for PostgreSQL had removed the development headers
from my system.
Fixing that corrected the problem and I got a successful compile and
install.
Thanks again for the assistance.
John
Wietse
* Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Rob Kelledy:
I have a bunch of mail being deferring with no available mx (mainly
typos).
What is the result of:
$ host -t mx example.com
$ host -t a example.com
With a suitable substitution for example.com.
If the DNS server says that BOTH the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Yes, you should be able to do this with a transport_maps entry
and a regexp (or pcre) smtp_generic_maps.
Thank you; however:
# main.cf
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
smtp_generic_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/generic.regexp
I have this:
Stefan Palme wrote:
Hi,
the following SMTP sessions works:
--
telnet localhost 25
...
EHLO localhost
...
MAIL FROM: root
250 2.1.0 Ok
RCPT TO: root
250 2.1.5 Ok
DATA
354 End data with CRLF.CRLF
To: root
From: root
Subject: test
.
250 2.0.0 Ok:
Replying to myself:
no, it really works now. Maybe I looked at the wrong log entry.
Thank you for your suggestions -- they work!
Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
Replying to myself:
no, it really works now. Maybe I looked at the wrong log entry.
Thank you for your suggestions -- they work!
Glad it worked. You had me worried there for a minute...
--
Noel Jones
Stefan Palme wrote:
Hi all,
Today seems to be postfix day, so sorry for the bulk of questions ;-)
When I receive a mail with only ONE envelope recipient, postfix
inserts a mail header of the form
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
mail.mydomain.com (Postfix) with
Stefan Palme wrote:
Hi,
is there a builtin way to make postfix remember bouncing recipient
addresses, so that further attempts to send mails to those addresses
can be rejected?
No. What problem are you trying to solve?
I do NOT want to use active recipient address verification. I only want
Stefan Palme wrote:
Hi,
is there a builtin way to make postfix remember bouncing recipient
addresses, so that further attempts to send mails to those addresses
can be rejected?
you must handle bounces in your (mass|bulk|list) mail system. most
mailing list managers can do this. if your
I am getting hit hard with email that has From that appears like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - where XXX is a random number such as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I currently have in my main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
reject_unauth_pipelining,
On Friday, August 29, 2008 at 17:52 CEST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting hit hard with email that has From that appears like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - where XXX is a random number such as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I currently have in my
Thank you Magnus;
Would access work for senders to my domain?
I am currently using it for recipients within my domain, but have not ever used
it for senders to my domain.
Thanks again,
.vp
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:21:05 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
On Friday, August 29, 2008 at 18:31 CEST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, because wildcards are not supported in dbm lookup tables
(see access(5)). Use regexp or (preferably) pcre instead.
See regexp_table(5) and pcre_table(5). Example for the latter:
/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ REJECT
Alle,
We would like to filter all internal email so that it bypasses
SpamAssassin. We have set up per_client_filters using:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/per_client_filter
== per_client_filter:
0.0.0.0/0 FILTER spamassassin:
10.0.0.0/8
By the way, how did you catch this?
.vp
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:21:05 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Reject Based On Senders Email Address
Do not start new topics by replying to old messages in old and
unrelated threads. Do use the compose new
Camron W. Fox wrote:
Alle,
We would like to filter all internal email so that it bypasses
SpamAssassin. We have set up per_client_filters using:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/per_client_filter
== per_client_filter:
0.0.0.0/0FILTER
My wife uses her laptop connected wirelessly to the network, but sending
mail has failed since I upgraded postfix to 2.5.2 and enabled SASL
authorization. Thunderbird keeps asking for her password on the server when
she tries to send mail (incoming mail reaches her inbox with no problems)
and
Rich Shepard:
My wife uses her laptop connected wirelessly to the network, but sending
mail has failed since I upgraded postfix to 2.5.2 and enabled SASL
authorization. Thunderbird keeps asking for her password on the server when
she tries to send mail (incoming mail reaches her inbox with
Rich Shepard wrote:
My wife uses her laptop connected wirelessly to the network, but sending
mail has failed since I upgraded postfix to 2.5.2 and enabled SASL
authorization. Thunderbird keeps asking for her password on the server when
she tries to send mail (incoming mail reaches her inbox
Noel Jones wrote:
Camron W. Fox wrote:
Alle,
We would like to filter all internal email so that it bypasses
SpamAssassin. We have set up per_client_filters using:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/per_client_filter
== per_client_filter:
0.0.0.0/0
Camron W. Fox wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
Camron W. Fox wrote:
Alle,
We would like to filter all internal email so that it bypasses
SpamAssassin. We have set up per_client_filters using:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/per_client_filter
==
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:43 PM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
Hi,
Someone could give me some documentation that talk of errors 4xx of the
Postfix?
4xx is an smtp code. it means temporary failure. the client MTA is
supposed to retry.
I'm with an error between
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
There are lots of hits when you search the web for:
cannot connect to saslauthd server: Permission denied
Likely one of them will have the answer.
I've tried a couple but without success. Also, I fixed main.cf per mouss'
message. I had cut and
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, mouss wrote:
smtpd_* parameters are used by 'smtpd', the thing that listens for smtp
connections. this is what you contact when you telnet or when Thunderbird
send mail.
mouss,
Mea culpa! I cut this from the README file and pasted it into main.cf
without paying close
Dear users, I'm quite suprised seeing this kind of messages at the mail
server:
Aug 29 17:19:31 mordred postfix/smtpd[23160]: connect from
fder1.fder.edu.uy[164.73.178.2]
Aug 29 17:19:32 mordred postfix/smtpd[23160]: setting up TLS connection
from fder1.fder.edu.uy[164.73.178.2]
Aug 29
Hi, this is my first post on the list so if I do something out of the
ordinary please forgive me.
The reason your mail is working locally is probably because postfix is
configured to accept mail from the local network or localhost without
any sort of authentication but not when the mail is
Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática wrote:
Dear users, I'm quite suprised seeing this kind of messages at the mail
server:
Aug 29 17:19:31 mordred postfix/smtpd[23160]: connect from
fder1.fder.edu.uy[164.73.178.2]
Aug 29 17:19:32 mordred postfix/smtpd[23160]: setting up TLS connection
Can anyone point me to a reasonable cookbook style web resource for
getting PostFix to play with Amavisd, SpamAssassin, ClamAv, and
Razor? There are no shortage of resources but they all seem so
impenetrable. I'm looking for put tab A in slot B instructions so
that when I'm done it works
Noel Jones escribió:
Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática wrote:
Dear users, I'm quite suprised seeing this kind of messages at the
mail server:
Aug 29 17:19:31 mordred postfix/smtpd[23160]: connect from
fder1.fder.edu.uy[164.73.178.2]
Aug 29 17:19:32 mordred postfix/smtpd[23160]:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Graham Leggett wrote:
Unfortunately the alternate usecase support in SASL is virtually non
existent, so you're stuck using strace to tease out the real error that is
preventing SASL from working. If you are truly stuck, use strace (or your
local equivalent) to run
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Graham Leggett wrote:
Once testsaslauthd works, then add postfix to the mix.
Graham,
I just ran testsaslauthd for my wife's account from the server:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# testsaslauthd -u pamela -p herpassword
0: OK Success.
So that seems to be OK. Same success if
Im looking for a programme that can run in daemon mode and watch one of my
mbox male files.
The idea I have is I would like to have the ability to send a email to one
of my addresses and have it execute commands based on email content.
I would essentially like to execute commands via
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Graham Leggett wrote:
Once testsaslauthd works, then add postfix to the mix.
Graham,
I just ran testsaslauthd for my wife's account from the server:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# testsaslauthd -u pamela -p herpassword
0: OK Success.
So that seems to be
hi everyone,
I have been working on putting postfix email server on unbuntu 8.04
server and after a very steep learn curve think I am ready to go online.
But I don't know if it is secure so below is what i have done. I need to
know if I have missed anything. So does anyone have anything I
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:57:51 +0200
Marcel Grandemange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im looking for a programme that can run in daemon mode and watch one
of my mbox male files.
The idea I have is I would like to have the ability to send a email
to one of my addresses and have it execute commands
Hello, Well firstly, I hope my postfix experience is going to better than
the pathetic ancient mailing list server that took 3 attempts with gmail in
subscriber confirmations...
Anyways... I am looking at replacing our outdated Qmail/ Vpopmail system,
I've read the docs and it seems simple enough
Bob Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone point me to a reasonable cookbook style web resource for
getting PostFix to play with Amavisd, SpamAssassin, ClamAv, and
Razor? There are no shortage of resources but they all seem so
impenetrable. I'm looking for put tab A in slot B
Eddie b [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, Well firstly, I hope my postfix experience is going to better
than the pathetic ancient mailing list server that took 3 attempts
with gmail in subscriber confirmations...
I hope you're not saying the postfix-users mailing list is pathetic; that
would
51 matches
Mail list logo
