J. Bakshi wrote:
J. Bakshi wrote:
mouss wrote:
J. Bakshi wrote:
Dear list,
I get an error like postfix/master[18801]: fatal: 127.0.0.1:smtps:
Servname not supported for ai_socktype
below is my main.cf of postfix. Could any one give me a clue ?
what does
# grep smtps
Almost. You should probably still have at least one domain listed, that
is used for the right-hand-side of aliases where the target should be a
local delivery. One approach is to use:
main.cf:
mydestination = local.invalid
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
Paul Cocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef in bericht
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have any experience with Altermime? The official mailing
list page appears to be dead, but it strikes me as likely that several
postfix users may have experience with the app.
I know the postfix page discourages
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:45:55PM -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
Ok. What does it mean when the external
command run by spawn receives an EOF on STDIN?
The client disconnected, and it should treated as though QUIT were sent.
You don't need to respond with 221 Ok, just exit.
This time the
J. Bakshi wrote:
The mail.warn log provides a message
postfix/master[1912]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd: bad command
startup -- throttling
check your logs. there are other logs before this one.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:08:55AM -0300, jakjr wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have one big distribution list (100K emails). I'm using virtual_alias_maps
for that like this:
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
where virtual:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
.
[EMAIL
J. Bakshi wrote:
Hello mouss,
Thanks for your kind help. I am now in a position to give you some
really good news. When I was looking close to my logs and got the error
can not connect to port 25 then your mail arrived and enlighten me.
I have modified my main.cf as below
#inet_interfaces
On Sep 22, 2008, at 8:08 AM, jakjr wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have one big distribution list (100K emails). I'm using
virtual_alias_maps for that like this:
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
where virtual:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Everything is
On 9/22/2008, Victor Duchovni ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
By default Postfix truncates virtual(5) expansion at 1000 recipients.
For lists this large you MUST not use virtual(5), rather use a :include:
valued local alias, AND set an owner-list alias to make sure that
bounces are NOT send to the
Paul Cocker wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with Altermime? The official mailing
list page appears to be dead, but it strikes me as likely that several
postfix users may have experience with the app.
I know the postfix page discourages footers via the MTA, but alas the UK
has laws
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 01:19:05PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Thank you both so much for your help. This was the problem - well, part
of it anyway. After setting the above, I could see that authentication
was failing. I could also see that Postfix was
Mauro Sanna wrote:
Not really. an OK in smtpd_sender_restrictions does not skip
smtpd_recipient_restrictions. In particular, it doesn't make you an open
relay.
If it doesn't skip so why not put directly in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
this is an anti-question. if you put it under
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
Hi all,
I have in my smtpd_sender_restrictions policy with the rule
reject_unknown_sender_domain active.
However, e-mail notification of other internal servers, which does not have
a valid domain are being blocked.
Therefore, I want create exceptions for those domains
Wietse,
If we don't care that Postfix handles mail correctly, why go through
the trouble of setting up an SQL database in the first place?
Things do not always come as one-bit on/off issues.
E.g. my ISP has an option of delivering a guaranteed 2Mbit ADSL line, but if
the capacity falls to
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 08:08 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
I have implemented a custom whitelist/blacklist with a milter. This
milter has been working smoothly for a nearly 2 years now on multiple
machines
But now On 1 machine even if the load is very low and there is ample
free
This is as handed down by our lawyer.
Paul Cocker
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mouss
Sent: 22 September 2008 14:38
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: [SPAM?] Re: Altermime
Importance: Low
Paul Cocker wrote:
Does anyone have any
Paul Cocker wrote:
This is as handed down by our lawyer.
now you may ask him/her if it's ok to put the disclaimer in headers,
knowing that headers travel along with the body.
putting the disclaimer in headers have some advantages:
- generally doesn't break signed mail
- less risks to
Hello people,
I have some questions for you,
I configured postfix with virtual domains and unix accounts, also I
configured sasl2 with pam (saslauthd) and tls with my own keys.
all seems to work, but there are some questions I can't find.
- where can I see what type of mech I'am using to
sorry I didn't say thanks for your help!!!
:)
Hello people,
I have some questions for you,
I configured postfix with virtual domains and unix accounts, also I
configured sasl2 with pam (saslauthd) and tls with my own keys.
all seems to work, but there are some questions I can't find.
- where
ram:
My milter is quiet simple. It just does a bsearch on a in-memory array ,
to find if the recipient has blacklisted / whitelisted the sender and
takes action accordingly
The array now has approx 200k elements, which should be nothing for
4GBRam box
What measures did you take to avoid
David Ballano wrote:
- where can I see what type of mech I'am using to authenticate? I
think is plain but..
also when I sent an email to my server (unix account ) I can see that (
using outlook to send an email to my server.)
Sep 22 13:51:55 orion postfix/smtpd[9636]: connect from
David Ballano wrote:
I added -v to the smtpd, it's just incredible...
Incredible how? I don't see anything terribly unusual here.
BTW, I don't use AUTH NTLM so I'm not sure what the normal
logging for an AUTH NTLM session looks like; it's quite
possible what you are seeing is normal and
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:08:55AM -0300, jakjr wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have one big distribution list (100K emails). I'm using virtual_alias_maps
for that like this:
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
where virtual:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
I need to add support for (multi-recipient) aliases that are only able
to receive messages from selected users.
I was initially looking at mailman or majordomo, however from what I
understand of them, they authenticate only on the from address so it
looks like it would be easy to forge.
Hi!
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Chris St Denis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to add support for (multi-recipient) aliases that are only able to
receive messages from selected users.
I was initially looking at mailman or majordomo, however from what I
understand of them, they
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 05:04:05PM +0200, mouss wrote:
under smtpd_recipient_restrictions, you can't (you don't want to skip
other checks) so you can only use DUNNO which is less flexible (dunno
will not skip the following checks, even in a single restriction class).
Actually, DUNNO only
Chris St Denis wrote:
I need to add support for (multi-recipient) aliases that are only able
to receive messages from selected users.
I was initially looking at mailman or majordomo, however from what I
understand of them, they authenticate only on the from address so it
looks like it would
I was wondering if anyone here knew of a good way to duplicate emails
for archival purposes.
What i want to do is use a gateway machine that will deliver mail to two
machines.
one being an active imap/pop3 system and the other being a mail archival
system
i was thinking that there might be
James wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here knew of a good way to duplicate emails
for archival purposes.
What i want to do is use a gateway machine that will deliver mail to
two machines.
one being an active imap/pop3 system and the other being a mail
archival system
i was thinking that
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 15:07 -0700, Chris St Denis wrote:
James wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here knew of a good way to duplicate emails
for archival purposes.
What i want to do is use a gateway machine that will deliver mail to
two machines.
one being an active imap/pop3 system
We use something similar. We are a small company so what suits us may
not be usable for you, either way I'll give you the run down so you can
decide. We use an alias to forward mail to the regular mail box that is
accessed via imap/pop and then to a custom program that stores the mail
in mbox
mouss wrote:
Chris St Denis wrote:
I need to add support for (multi-recipient) aliases that are only
able to receive messages from selected users.
I was initially looking at mailman or majordomo, however from what I
understand of them, they authenticate only on the from address so it
looks
We use MailScanner as spam and virus filter and the mail archiving and
monitoring function to copy mails in dedicated account, it is easy
configurable with rules to copy mails in severals mails account, see
http://www.mailscanner.info/
Sam.
Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
On Mon, 2008-09-22
Chris St Denis wrote:
Dealing with forgeries from the internet isn't a big concern because
incoming mail comes in on a different ip, I can just block all
incoming mail with from: locally hosted domain. It is preventing
senders from one local domain from spoofing another for these
restricted
On 09/22/2008 08:02:44 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
This is a shell script that sits between a Postfix SMTP client and
a Postfix SMTP server. It is implemented with awk and nc. awk
reads from the SMTP client and sends modified content into nc.
The shell script runs as a child process of the spawn
35 matches
Mail list logo
