hello;(after spending 6days of starring at the same
message);
I can't figure this out for the life of me.
I've compiled balsa from source using this
tutorial:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/xsoft/balsa.html
when building I've decided to use postfix as the mta instead of esmtp.
The
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Chris Cameron ch...@upnix.com wrote:
I have a Postfix server that sits in front of Exchange. Exchange has
anti-spam software running that will reject what it deems as spam.
This is creating a problem for Postfix, which accepts a message, and
tries to send it to
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Chris Dos ch...@chrisdos.com wrote:
I'm at a loss why this is not working. I'm sending a VERP SMTP e-mail using
the following script:
(
echo EHLO $(uname -n)
echo MAIL FROM:ch...@chrisdos.com XVERP
echo RCPT TO:no-one-h...@chrisdos.com
Hi
can i whitelist one domain from checking spamhaus ?
thanks
On 18.03.2009 08:55 K bharathan wrote:
Hi
can i whitelist one domain from checking spamhaus ?
thanks
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
reject_unauth_destination
...
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/whitelist_clients
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/whitelist_senders
2009/3/18 Justin Mattock justinmatt...@gmail.com:
hello;(after spending 6days of starring at the same
message);
I can't figure this out for the life of me.
I've compiled balsa from source using this
tutorial:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/xsoft/balsa.html
when building
* LuKreme krem...@kreme.com:
On 17-Mar-2009, at 13:45, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noplaintext, noanonymous
smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous
As for the PAM part in the sasl authentication, start saslauthd like
this:
saslauthd -a pam -m
On Wednesday, March 18, 2009 at 07:20 CET,
Justin Mattock justinmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
hello;(after spending 6days of starring at the same
message);
I can't figure this out for the life of me.
I've compiled balsa from source using this
tutorial:
Justin Mattock:
Mar 17 15:16:34 name postfix/pickup[1795]: 61712AE1C4: uid=1000 from=a-12
Mar 17 15:16:34 name postfix/cleanup[2113]: 61712AE1C4:
message-id=1237328194.190...@unix
Mar 17 15:16:34 name postfix/cleanup[2113]: 61712AE1C4: to=unknown,
relay=none, delay=0.13, delays=0.13/0/0/0,
On 3/17/2009, Chris Dos (ch...@chrisdos.com) wrote:
Sorry, I did have:
recipient_delimiter = +
in another part of my main.cf file.
One reason why the DEBUG_README asks (among other things) that you
provide output of postconf -n instead of snips from main.cf.
--
Best regards,
Charles
Chris Dos:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Chris Dos:
relay=mail.chrisdos.com[71.33.251.73]:25, delay=0.19,
delays=0.02/0/0.11/0.05, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (host
mail.chrisdos.com[71.33.251.73] said: 550 5.1.1
chris+no-one-home=chrisdos@chrisdos.com: Recipient
address rejected: User
I've been reading today about;
reject_unknown_sender_domain
and I'm wondering if it is only allowed under 'smtpd_sender_restrictions'
whereas I've had it under 'smtpd_recipient_restrictions'. Is this correct?
thanks,
Chas.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:11 PM, c...@digital-journal.com wrote:
I've been reading today about;
reject_unknown_sender_domain
and I'm wondering if it is only allowed under 'smtpd_sender_restrictions'
whereas I've had it under 'smtpd_recipient_restrictions'. Is this correct?
thanks,
Chas.
Bill Cole wrote:
Noel Jones wrote, On 3/15/09 4:26 PM:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
OpenDNS will not blindly redirect DNS queries that look like DNSBL
requests. Notice the difference:
% dig @resolver1.opendns.com
W dniu 2009-03-18 14:23, Costin Guşă pisze:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:11 PM,c...@digital-journal.com wrote:
I've been reading today about;
reject_unknown_sender_domain
and I'm wondering if it is only allowed under 'smtpd_sender_restrictions'
whereas I've had it under
W dniu 2009-03-18 14:23, Costin GuÅÄ pisze:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:11 PM,c...@digital-journal.com wrote:
I've been reading today about;
reject_unknown_sender_domain
and I'm wondering if it is only allowed under
'smtpd_sender_restrictions'
whereas I've had it under
Paweł Leśniak wrote:
W dniu 2009-03-18 14:23, Costin Guşă pisze:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:11 PM, c...@digital-journal.com wrote:
I've been reading today about;
reject_unknown_sender_domain
and I'm wondering if it is only allowed under 'smtpd_sender_restrictions'
whereas I've had it
c...@digital-journal.com wrote:
W dniu 2009-03-18 14:23, Costin Guşă pisze:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:11 PM,c...@digital-journal.com wrote:
I've been reading today about;
reject_unknown_sender_domain
and I'm wondering if it is only allowed under
'smtpd_sender_restrictions'
whereas I've
(didn't mean to take so long to respond,
was too tired);
As for using telnet(thanks for the info
I'll have to compile that into the system
and see what it produces.
In regards to the -t option,
are there modules that need to be put into
/etc/postfix/main.cf
to help with this purpose?
As for:
On 18-Mar-2009, at 02:38, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* LuKreme krem...@kreme.com:
path to which socket there?
$ ls -ls /var/run/saslauthd/
total 2
0 srwxrwxrwx 1 root postfix 0 Mar 17 03:52 mux
mux it is.
Starting saslauthd.
saslauthd[91067] :main: could not chdir to:
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/17/2009, Chris Dos (ch...@chrisdos.com) wrote:
Sorry, I did have:
recipient_delimiter = +
in another part of my main.cf file.
One reason why the DEBUG_README asks (among other things) that you
provide output of postconf -n instead of snips from main.cf.
Here is
Hello everybody!
I have a little problem with local delivery performance. Due to specific mail
routes (it's complicated), on a couples of my SMTP gateways, I have to deliver
all local mail to another smtp:host:25. I do the following:
myhostname = external.mydomain.com
mydomain = mydomain.com
* LuKreme krem...@kreme.com:
On 18-Mar-2009, at 02:38, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* LuKreme krem...@kreme.com:
path to which socket there?
$ ls -ls /var/run/saslauthd/
total 2
0 srwxrwxrwx 1 root postfix 0 Mar 17 03:52 mux
mux it is.
Starting saslauthd.
saslauthd[91067] :main
On 18-Mar-2009, at 09:07, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
testsaslauthd
$ testsaslauthd -u u...@mysqlhosted.tld -p password
0: NO authentication failed
$ testsaslauthd -u user -p password
0: OK Success.
So I can authenticate against the local users with testsaslauth, but I
cannot over smtp
devel anaconda:
Hello everybody!
I have a little problem with local delivery performance. Due to
specific mail routes (it's complicated), on a couples of my SMTP
gateways, I have to deliver all local mail to another smtp:host:25.
I do the following:
myhostname = external.mydomain.com
Mar 18 17:25:19 relay2 postfix/smtp[21383]: 5470B21265:
to=41b.4.74998426-6452...@whereverstormy.com, relay=
mail.WhereverStormy.com[173.46.193.75]:25, delay=418568,
delays=418439/0.46/4.7/123, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred (lost connection with
mail.WhereverStormy.com[173.46.193.75] while sending
* K bharathan kbhara...@gmail.com:
Mar 18 17:25:19 relay2 postfix/smtp[21383]: 5470B21265:
to=41b.4.74998426-6452...@whereverstormy.com, relay=
mail.WhereverStormy.com[173.46.193.75]:25, delay=418568,
delays=418439/0.46/4.7/123, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred (lost connection with
Wietse Venema wrote:
That is what YOU believe. You probably made a typo somewhere. This
is why you should post postconf -n command output, as requested
in the mailing list welcome message which you decided to ignore.
I don't believe that header addresses contain ONLY an e-mail
address.
Chris Dos wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
That is what YOU believe. You probably made a typo somewhere. This
is why you should post postconf -n command output, as requested
in the mailing list welcome message which you decided to ignore.
I don't believe that header addresses contain ONLY an
18.03.09, 18:27, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
devel anaconda:
Hello everybody!
I have a little problem with local delivery performance. Due to
specific mail routes (it's complicated), on a couples of my SMTP
gateways, I have to deliver all local mail to another smtp:host:25.
K bharathan:
Mar 18 17:25:19 relay2 postfix/smtp[21383]: 5470B21265:
to=41b.4.74998426-6452...@whereverstormy.com, relay=
mail.WhereverStormy.com[173.46.193.75]:25, delay=418568,
delays=418439/0.46/4.7/123, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred (lost connection with
devel anaconda wrote:
18.03.09, 18:27, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
devel anaconda:
Hello everybody!
I have a little problem with local delivery performance. Due to
specific mail routes (it's complicated), on a couples of my SMTP
gateways, I have to deliver all local mail to another
devel anaconda:
18.03.09, 18:27, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
devel anaconda:
Hello everybody!
I have a little problem with local delivery performance. Due to
specific mail routes (it's complicated), on a couples of my SMTP
gateways, I have to deliver all local mail
On Wed March 18 2009 03:06:40 Pascal Volk wrote:
can i whitelist one domain from checking spamhaus ?
thanks
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
reject_unauth_destination
...
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/whitelist_clients
check_sender_access
/dev/rob0:
On Wed March 18 2009 03:06:40 Pascal Volk wrote:
can i whitelist one domain from checking spamhaus ?
thanks
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
reject_unauth_destination
...
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/whitelist_clients
check_sender_access
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:56:48PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
/dev/rob0:
On Wed March 18 2009 03:06:40 Pascal Volk wrote:
can i whitelist one domain from checking spamhaus ?
thanks
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
reject_unauth_destination
...
Victor Duchovni:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:56:48PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
/dev/rob0:
Some comments I would add:
1. I consider it best practice to use permit_auth_destination rather
than OK for whitelisting. That's an extra safety check in case you
accidentally put
We may be getting a wildcard SSL cert shortly, which would allow us
under the licensing terms to use it on as many servers as we wanted.
I currently have Postfix setup to support SSL/TLS using a self-signed
cert.
As mail servers obviously work hands off and you don't have human eyes
to notice
Noel Jones wrote:
It looks like I want to check for RCPT TO:VERP_Address
So I ran this check against the regexp table using postmap:
postmap -q RCPT TO:chris+no-one-home=chrisdos@chrisdos.com
regexp:header_checks.regexp
and it came back with a result of DISCARD.
So I guess I don't
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Simon grem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
You are expanding the virtual aliase BEFORE the Amavis filter,
and another time after mail is filtered.
See http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README, and
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:06:57PM -, Paul Hutchings wrote:
I believe there are some issues that can be specific to wildcard certs
(Server Alternate Names has cropped up) that can mitigate this, but in
short, is it a good idea or a terrible idea?
For MX hosts, self-signed certs are the
Chris Dos wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
It looks like I want to check for RCPT TO:VERP_Address
So I ran this check against the regexp table using postmap:
postmap -q RCPT TO:chris+no-one-home=chrisdos@chrisdos.com
regexp:header_checks.regexp
and it came back with a result of DISCARD.
So I guess
I don't see a forward action in header_checks. Maybe you intend to use
REDIRECT? Postfix access tables allow more than accept/reject,
including REDIRECT.
http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html
But my point is that header_checks are the wrong tool for the job.
There is no guarantee that
my relay server has got multiple relay domains and i want only exempt mails
to one particular domain from checking spamhaus; given below
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_recipient
reject_non_fqdn_sender
reject_unknown_sender_domain
Simon a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Simon grem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
You are expanding the virtual aliase BEFORE the Amavis filter,
and another time after mail is filtered.
See
Alberto Lepe a écrit :
[snip]
I understand now about top-posting... Sorry for that.
the other nice things that we like is trimming: remove things that are
not essential. see the [snip] above.
Thank you Sahil, I just got it with your explanation about
smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender, and
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:39 AM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
Simon a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Simon grem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
wrote:
You are expanding the virtual aliase BEFORE the Amavis filter,
and
47 matches
Mail list logo
