* Julio Cesar Covolato (ju...@psi.com.br) [090514 07:26]:
Hi!
I made a litle shell script to stoping bootnets and zombis, and I want
know what you think about it.
The purpose is drop via iptables hosts that are rejected several
times in a litle space of time, reading the log
Samuel Sappa a écrit :
I have problem with my postfix, a few days ago my smtpd running very
slow, when delivering message (using MUA outlook,TB,OE) message
delivering very slow, but if user using web mail which is using
openwebmail the deliver running fine without the delay, I came to
Julio Cesar Covolato wrote:
Hi!
I made a litle shell script to stoping bootnets and zombis, and I want
know what you think about it.
The purpose is drop via iptables hosts that are rejected several
times in a litle space of time, reading the log generated by postfix.
Tested in a
Victor Duchovni wrote:
Yes, some of the better distribution supported patches are not ill-advised.
But occasionally, one gets something along the lines of the Debian OpenSSL
fiasco (notably the Debian *Postfix* patches have been pretty good, and
historically RedHat was adding rather
MacShane, Tracy wrote:
Yes, there is unfortunately such a need, because RHEL5 is only up to
Postfix 2.3, and we require functionality from Postfix 2.5 and up
(destination_rate_delay).
This leads to an interesting question all its own:
I'm running the same Postfix config I built years
Drew Tomlinson a écrit :
Is there some rule about submitting questions with the string Help in
the subject? I've tried posting the following note with the subject of
Help With header_checks and received a bounce message indicating this
error:
BOUNCE postfix-users@postfix.org: Admin
On Thursday, 14. Mai 2009 09:54:56 Corey Chandler wrote:
MacShane, Tracy wrote:
snip
The OS administrators do not permit GCC and
devel libraries on the SMTP servers I maintain (and fair enough).
Nor should they-- this is what a staging environment is for. Build it
on a staging box, test
2009/5/14 Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com:
If the purpose of using RPM files is to facilitate binary updates from
distribution servers, wait until *your distribution* upgrades to a newer
supported version of Postfix.
If you incorporate your own Postfix into your O/S, why
On May 14, 2009, at 02:03, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Is there a real use case for binary RPMs not maintained by the
distribution release engineering teams? What's wrong with the Postfix
source, which is typically less likely to have ill-advised patches
dropped into it?
A bit off topic already
Hi,
On May 14, 2009, at 01:07, Just E. Mail wrote:
I noticed that Postfix V#2.6.0 is now out. Does anybody know where
to get RPM files? GOOGLE did not help.
The SRPM from Fedora should compile fine on at least EL4 and EL5. I
suggest you download it and build it yourself instead of
On May 14, 2009, at 12:25, Barney Desmond wrote:
Sure; as people have already said, some vendors (cough, Redhat) don't
really keep up to date. I haven't checked all their release channels
on offer, but the core set of packages only includes Postfix 2.3.3.
*And* it doesn't come with mysql/pgsql
Hallo all. (first sorry for my english)
I have a small (big) problem with configure Postfix to drop messages with
header_checks.
In main.cf I have:
smtpd_milters = local:/./clamav-milter.sock
local:/./spamass-milter.sock
milter_default_action = accept
if I receive a message from
Hello everybody,
I am running FreeBSD with postfix (2.6.0-RC2) and dovecot (1.1.11).
There are virtual domains and users and postfix authenticates users
using sasl and dovecot.
Today I've performed a server upgrade (portupgrade -arRv) and sasl
authentication works no more. It worked for the last 4
Please include postconf -n command output in problem reports,
as requested in the mailing list welcome message.
wiseadmin:
Hello everybody,
I am running FreeBSD with postfix (2.6.0-RC2) and dovecot (1.1.11).
There are virtual domains and users and postfix authenticates users
using sasl and dovecot.
Today I've performed a server upgrade (portupgrade -arRv) and sasl
authentication works no more. It
Jiri Veselsky schrieb:
Hallo all. (first sorry for my english)
I have a small (big) problem with configure Postfix to drop messages
with header_checks.
In main.cf I have:
smtpd_milters = local:/./clamav-milter.sock
local:/./spamass-milter.sock
milter_default_action = accept
if I
Sorry, here is output:
alias_database = dbm:/etc/mail/aliases.db
alias_maps = hash:/etc/mail/aliases
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
command_directory = /usr/local/sbin
config_directory = /usr/local/etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/local/libexec/postfix
data_directory = /var/db/postfix
you shouldnt discard mail, only cause flagged by spamassassin
this is not allowed i.e in germany by law, if you do this for customers
use hold ( for manual inspection ) or tell spamass-milter to reject them
at smtp income level
additionally you may load sanesecurity spam sig to clamd,
I have problem with some user. This user's sometimes receive email:
A message that you send could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients.
And Sometimes send email correct. No problem
How to control thats?
--
I noticed that Postfix V#2.6.0 is now out. Does anybody know where to
get RPM files? GOOGLE did not help.
Simon Mudd picks up the releases and makes good source and binary RPMs from
them with lots of options. However, he's a busy man and does not always get
to them right after release. A
Is there a real use case for binary RPMs not maintained by the
distribution release engineering teams? What's wrong with the Postfix
source, which is typically less likely to have ill-advised patches
dropped into it?
Because those of us who run package-based systems find things work better
On Thu, May 14, 2009 2:20 pm, Esteban Torres Rodriguez said:
I have problem with some user. This user's sometimes receive email:
A message that you send could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients.
And Sometimes send email correct. No problem
How to control thats?
Jiri Veselsky:
[ Charset ISO-8859-2 unsupported, converting... ]
Hallo all. (first sorry for my english)
I have a small (big) problem with configure Postfix to drop messages with
header_checks.
In main.cf I have:
smtpd_milters = local:/./clamav-milter.sock
On May 14, 2009, at 7:40 AM, wiseadmin wisead...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am running FreeBSD with postfix (2.6.0-RC2) and dovecot (1.1.11).
There are virtual domains and users and postfix authenticates users
using sasl and dovecot.
Today I've performed a server upgrade (portupgrade
Postfix header_checks happen while mail is received.
Milters can add headers only after the end of the email message is
received. That is a feature of the Milter protocol.
The Milter protocol has a DISCARD feature. If you can configure
your application to send SMFIR_DISCARD into Postfix then
* Brian Collins lis...@newnanutilities.org:
I noticed that Postfix V#2.6.0 is now out. Does anybody know where to
get RPM files? GOOGLE did not help.
Simon Mudd picks up the releases and makes good source and binary RPMs from
them with lots of options. However, he's a busy man and does
wiseadmin:
May 14 14:35:11 softexp postfix/smtpd[8378]: warning: SASL: Connect to
smtpd failed: No such file or directory
You need to update your main.cf:smtpd_sasl_path setting and specify
the location of the socket that the Dovecot server listens on.
For example, when dovecot.conf says:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Brian Collins lis...@newnanutilities.org:
I noticed that Postfix V#2.6.0 is now out. Does anybody know where to
get RPM files? GOOGLE did not help.
Simon Mudd picks up the releases and makes good source and binary RPMs from
them with lots of options. However, he's a
wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Recently I've been getting a ton of email for a new domain we've registered and
have begun receiving email for. Our users in this new domain are either
1. receiving email with a From address identical to their own, or
2. receiving email with a From address of one
Here are the contents of my /etc/postfix/blocked_senders file:
operator#...@somephishingbanksite\.com REJECT
The above line is the wrong syntax and will never match
anything. Wildcards are not allowed in dbm or other indexed
files, and quotes should never be used.
I am almost certain
Jiri Veselsky schrieb:
you shouldnt discard mail, only cause flagged by spamassassin
this is not allowed i.e in germany by law, if you do this for customers
use hold ( for manual inspection ) or tell spamass-milter to reject them
at smtp income level
additionally you may load sanesecurity
mouss wrote:
Drew Tomlinson a écrit :
Is there some rule about submitting questions with the string Help in
the subject? I've tried posting the following note with the subject of
Help With header_checks and received a bounce message indicating this
error:
BOUNCE postfix-users@postfix.org:
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
What drawbacks did you experience? We run a local policyd instance on each
postfix server too, all connecting to a central (not replicated) MySQL.
Policyd's behaviour when MySQL becomes unavailable is configurable, it can
either tempfail (4xx) all incoming e-mail or
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Sorry to hear that but in the mean time you can grab .src.rpm for a
prior release, the tarball for the current release and modify the
.spec file to reflect this.
I've been doing this for our smtp servers for some time. The suse
factory postfix srpm compiles nicely
Hello All,
I am receiving message from people faking like they are from our domain,
when looking in the headers I see this:
Received-SPF: permerror (mydomain.com: Junk encountered in mechanism
'+ptr:')
Read this on the spf site:
If the permerror occurred because an SPF publisher uses
wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Here are the contents of my /etc/postfix/blocked_senders file:
operator#...@somephishingbanksite\.com REJECT
The above line is the wrong syntax and will never match
anything. Wildcards are not allowed in dbm or other indexed
files, and quotes should never be
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:15:07AM -0700, J Sloan wrote:
Yes, that is the benefit of doing it that way. But we experienced problems
with recurring corruption of the isam tables when the network connections
to the db server were interrupted. Apparently myisam tables don't deal well
with
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:15:07AM -0700, J Sloan wrote:
Yes, that is the benefit of doing it that way. But we experienced problems
with recurring corruption of the isam tables when the network connections
to the db server were interrupted. Apparently myisam tables
Thank you Wietse !
Unfortunately it doesnt work :(
In dovecot.conf the socket is /var/run/dovecot/auth-master
When I added in main.cf I got permission denied (it has 600 and
root:wheel). I changed the permission in 666 (this is not ok, but I only
wanted to see if it works) and now I get in logs
I think the problem is
deeper.
The 25/tcp port is open but I can't ehlo the server.
[...@toshiba ~]$telnet server_domain 25
Trying 80.96.x.x...
Connected to server_domain.
Escape character is '^]'.
And get stucked there !
Wietse Venema wrote:
wiseadmin:
May 14 14:35:11
Why not?
It is simple for my setup. I only have 10-15 users and that's all.
If you think its dangerous or something please explain and I'll change
it.
Thanks
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 7:40 AM, wiseadmin
wisead...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am running
A client of mine has a web service where a simple web page can be made
via a browser to crete an identity for them online. Build a page with
web tools, toggle a setting to add DNS records, update the registrar
to point to the NS's, and they have a live webpage in short order.
They want to
2009/5/15 Joey j...@web56.net:
Received-SPF: permerror (mydomain.com: Junk encountered in mechanism
'+ptr:')
“If the permerror occurred because an SPF publisher uses a mechanism not
understood by an SPF client and the receiver does not reject the message due
to the permerror, that mechanism
2009/5/15 Scott Haneda talkli...@newgeo.com:
Any suggestions on the simplest way to approach this. I was thinking
postfix with MySql backed data store. Today I read that RHEL is behind on
postfix, and I think does not have MySql support in their rpm's. I have
zero access to a staging
Didn't get the message you replied to, so I'm bolting it on to yours.
mouss wrote:
Stefan Jakobs a écrit :
On Thursday, 14. Mai 2009 09:54:56 Corey Chandler wrote:
MacShane, Tracy wrote:
Also,
installing non-RPM packages can obviously cause clashes when installing
other RH
Hello All,
I am receiving message from people faking like they are from our domain,
when looking in the headers I see this:
Received-SPF: permerror (mydomain.com: Junk encountered in mechanism
'+ptr:')
Read this on the spf site:
If the permerror occurred because an SPF publisher uses
At my company we're doing almost the exact same thing.
FOr this we use Postfix on RHEL5 with MySQL for domains, users and aliases.
With about ~10k accounts everything works great except the forwarding vs SPF
problem, ie:
1. someu...@hotmail.com sends a message to i...@yourcustomer.com
2. your
On May 14, 2009, at 6:07 PM, Barney Desmond wrote:
If this turns into a high volume site, would file based aliases
fall apart
after a certain amount? I also see maintaining a alias mapping via
a file
managed by a web service to be prone to error. If anything I wold
store the
mappings in
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:42:01PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Here are the contents of my /etc/postfix/blocked_senders file:
operator#...@somephishingbanksite\.com REJECT
The above line is the wrong syntax and will never match
anything.
mouss wrote:
Drew Tomlinson a écrit :
mouss wrote:
I have no preference for header_checks. What makes client_access
better? Is it less expensive?
it's time to learn how smtp works. in particluar, the fact that the
message is sent after the DATA command. which means that if you
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:48:07PM -0700, Scott Haneda wrote:
Thank you very much, I do not think a million will be hit for some time.
Is there any penalty when you run postmap to read in the changes to the
virtual_alias_maps file? I know it is not a server restart, and can happen
51 matches
Mail list logo
