On Mon, May 18, 2009 14:48:12 PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
I, for one, would urge the more sophisticated users, who need the
latest release, to learn how to use/build source RPMs, and build the
official Postfix release via source RPM that resembles the vendor's
support source RPM, but
On Mon, May 18, 2009 20:38:54 PM +0200, Simon J Mudd wrote:
I'll see if I can make some time to build some 2.6 rpms, but am
likely to respond more if there are people who show an interest in
these rpms I build.
+1 for me, thanks if you find the time!
Marco
--
Your own civil rights and the
Hello 'list';
This is my first time out in 'list' land so please don't flame me if I
get the format wrong. Coaching and constructive criticism is fine ;-)
{usenet group seems to be almost dead ?}
I've recently noticed that my Postfix is being a naughty bunny. It is
attempting to query my ISP
* Steve steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
Hello 'list';
This is my first time out in 'list' land so please don't flame me if I
get the format wrong. Coaching and constructive criticism is fine ;-)
{usenet group seems to be almost dead ?}
I've recently noticed that my Postfix is being a
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 09:28 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Steve steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
Hello 'list';
This is my first time out in 'list' land so please don't flame me if I
get the format wrong. Coaching and constructive criticism is fine ;-)
{usenet group seems to be almost
* Steve steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
I disagree. It looks like Postfix is broken. Whilst I can see the desire
to look up private IP ranges to see if they have a PTR record, it would
not be unreasonable to expect it not to do it for trusted clients - such
as those defined in
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 09:39 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Steve steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
I disagree. It looks like Postfix is broken. Whilst I can see the desire
to look up private IP ranges to see if they have a PTR record, it would
not be unreasonable to expect it not to do
* Steve steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
Where is this behaviour documented?
Good question. If it is not surely it would make a sensible feature
request? Clearly as an expert on Postfix perhaps you can tell *ME* how
to get Postfix to stop attempting rubbish DNS lookups rather than try
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 10:43 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Steve steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
Where is this behaviour documented?
Good question. If it is not surely it would make a sensible feature
request? Clearly as an expert on Postfix perhaps you can tell *ME* how
to get
* Steve steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
Indeed, Postfix does *not* perform DNS queries. However, it asks the
question in the first instance that results in the lookup. This is just
a case of arguing semantics. It is close to buggy behaviour IMHO. If it
produces unintended results = bug.
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
Indeed, Postfix does *not* perform DNS queries. However, it asks the
question in the first instance that results in the lookup. This is just
a case of arguing semantics. It is close to buggy behaviour IMHO. If it
produces unintended results
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
smtpd_peername_lookup = no
Any idea what it defaults to Ralf?
* Steve steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
smtpd_peername_lookup = no
Any idea what it defaults to Ralf?
postconf -d smtpd_peername_lookup
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450
On Mon, May 18, 2009 20:38:54 PM +0200, Simon J Mudd wrote:
I'll see if I can make some time to build some 2.6 rpms, but am
likely to respond more if there are people who show an interest in
these rpms I build.
+1 for me, thanks if you find the time!
2.7 snapshot rpms for CentOSv4
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 11:15 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Steve steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk:
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
smtpd_peername_lookup = no
Any idea what it defaults to Ralf?
postconf -d smtpd_peername_lookup
No good. Stops all PTR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Steve wrote:
I'll have to live with the waste of bandwidth looking up local clients
has on the network. It's a small cost value, but an unnecessary one and
it really should be more configurable than on or off. There needs to be
a way to make
On 5/19/2009, Steve (steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk) wrote:
Just where is anything fully documented with Postfix? There is a lot of
'half' documentation Ralf and plenty of 'assumed that you know'. It the
documentation was s great I would not have had to ask on a list for
something
On Tue, May 19, 2009 10:49, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
smtpd_peername_lookup = yes
I meant: smtpd_peername_lookup = no - of course.
smtpd_peername_excemptions_maps missing so ?
--
http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 10:49, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
smtpd_peername_lookup = yes
I meant: smtpd_peername_lookup = no - of course.
smtpd_peername_excemptions_maps missing so ?
Its way.
Steve,
Its not possible disable PTR
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 06:41 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/19/2009, Steve (steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk) wrote:
Just where is anything fully documented with Postfix? There is a lot of
'half' documentation Ralf and plenty of 'assumed that you know'. It the
documentation was s
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Steve
steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk wrote:
Can you fix your client to post ONLIST please, and not direct to user.
From the headers of your email:
Reply-to: steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk
So either the list software is broken, or yours is (I suspect the
I'll see if I can make some time to build some 2.6 rpms, but am likely
to respond more if there are people who show an interest in these rpms
I build.
+1 for me as well, Simon. I appreciate your work and have used your RPMs
for years to keep my mail servers and filters up to date.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:51:57AM +0100, Steve wrote:
I'll have to live with the waste of bandwidth looking up local clients
has on the network. It's a small cost value, but an unnecessary one and
Thanks for the laugh. I wonder what you call not having a local caching
nameserver then? You do
Steve:
I've recently noticed that my Postfix is being a naughty bunny. It is
attempting to query my ISP nameserver to reverse resolve LAN addresses
defined in my_networks.
There are many errors in that statement.
1) Postfix does not send DNS queries to your ISP, or to anyone else.
2) The
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 06:41 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/19/2009, Steve (steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk) wrote:
Just where is anything fully documented with Postfix? There is a lot of
'half' documentation Ralf and plenty of 'assumed that you know'. It the
documentation was s
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 14:52 +0300, Henrik K wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:51:57AM +0100, Steve wrote:
I'll have to live with the waste of bandwidth looking up local clients
has on the network. It's a small cost value, but an unnecessary one and
Thanks for the laugh. I wonder what
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 12:32 +0200, Victoriano Giralt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Steve wrote:
I'll have to live with the waste of bandwidth looking up local clients
has on the network. It's a small cost value, but an unnecessary one and
it really should be
Steve:
DNS for local queries. It's wierd that it only happens with reverse
lookups from Postfix. I can't see why nothing else does this, just
postfix and PTR.
You have turned on the chroot feature for smtpd in master.cf,
but you have not provided the proper name service files in the
Hi ,
I have a setup with postfix integrated with spamassassin and amavis. I have
a configuration with all spam tagged mails redirected to a spam id. For a
user i have a problem with mails not being recieved in inbox though postfix
logs say its delivered. I checked out time stamp with client
* punit jain contactpunitj...@gmail.com:
Hi ,
I have a setup with postfix integrated with spamassassin and amavis. I
have a configuration with all spam tagged mails redirected to a spam
id. For a user i have a problem with mails not being recieved in inbox
though postfix logs say its
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Steve wrote:
lookups from Postfix. I can't see why nothing else does this, just
postfix and PTR.
Sendmail also does this (and likely Exim and others), unless IIRC, the
range was included in access AND class R, this likely wont work with
Postfix's methods since
Zitat von Andreas Schuldei andreas+post...@schuldei.org:
* Julio Cesar Covolato (ju...@psi.com.br) [090514 07:26]:
Hi!
I made a litle shell script to stoping bootnets and zombis, and I want
know what you think about it.
The purpose is drop via iptables hosts that are rejected several
I have a postfix mail server (postfix-2.3.3-2.1.centos.mysql_pgsql)
hosting 20-30 virtual domains on mysql.
Now I find myself with the need to make that server also the
secondary MX for another specific domain that I was for all users.
If I understand the steps correctly (from
On 5/19/2009, Steve (steve.h...@digitalcertainty.co.uk) wrote:
Just where is anything fully documented with Postfix?
http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html
?
--
Best regards,
Charles
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 17:36, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 09:42:08AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
IF /^Received: .*by mail.my.domain/
IF /no client certificate/
/(.*)\(No client certificate requested\)(.*)/
REPLACE $1 $2
ENDIF
ENDIF
[Reply-To set, as this is only peripheral to Postfix]
Just E. Mail wrote, On 5/10/09 11:17 AM:
This question is going to be difficult for many to answer, but please
help.
I am trying to setup a Master/Client server setup to run Postfix. The
MASTER server has Postfix PostgreSQL Client
I am posting this message here because I want Postfix uses to suggest a
webmail application best suited with Postfix. This question has been
asked and answered several times but since LINUX is changing so fast, I
am asking again.
System: CentOS 5.3, NSF-1.3.23, PostgreSQL-8.3.7,
Just E. Mail wrote:
I am posting this message here because I want Postfix uses to suggest a
webmail application best suited with Postfix. This question has been
asked and answered several times but since LINUX is changing so fast, I
am asking again.
System: CentOS 5.3, NSF-1.3.23,
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Just E. Mail justem...@imwell-usa.com wrote:
I am posting this message here because I want Postfix uses to suggest a
webmail application best suited with Postfix. This question has been asked
and answered several times but since LINUX is changing so fast, I am
post...@corwyn.net wrote:
I have a postfix mail server (postfix-2.3.3-2.1.centos.mysql_pgsql)
hosting 20-30 virtual domains on mysql.
Now I find myself with the need to make that server also the secondary
MX for another specific domain that I was for all users.
If I understand the steps
Carlos Williams wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Just E. Mail justem...@imwell-usa.com
wrote:
I am posting this message here because I want Postfix uses to suggest a
webmail application best suited with Postfix. This question has been asked
and answered several times but since
Friends,
What would be valuable (or at least interesting) to me is to treat the RDNS
lookup (peer address-name and subsequent name-address) as a part of
smtpd_client_restrictions, or in some way delay it until that time. Currently,
it seems that both of the above lookups take place before any
At 11:40 AM 5/19/2009, Noel Jones wrote:
Add an entry to /etc/postfix/relay_recipients:
@the.backed-up.domain.tld x
Technically correct, but unwise.
You must validate recipients for the backed-up domain.
why must?
Won't the mail just be forwarded to the primary mail server, who can
reject
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:07 PM, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
At 11:40 AM 5/19/2009, Noel Jones wrote:
Add an entry to /etc/postfix/relay_recipients:
@the.backed-up.domain.tld x
Technically correct, but unwise.
You must validate recipients for the backed-up domain.
why must?
Won't the
Thank you all.
I am going with roundcube: http://www.roundcube.net
post...@corwyn.net wrote:
At 11:40 AM 5/19/2009, Noel Jones wrote:
Add an entry to /etc/postfix/relay_recipients:
@the.backed-up.domain.tld x
Technically correct, but unwise.
You must validate recipients for the backed-up domain.
why must?
Won't the mail just be forwarded to the primary
Security Admin (NetSec):
I have a network device that I am trying to have logs sent to my
mail server via my postfix mail gateway. When trying to send a
test e-mail I get the following error in my maillog file:
postfix/smtpd[17063]: warning: Illegal address syntax from
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Just E. Mail justem...@imwell-usa.com wrote:
Thank you all.
I am going with roundcube: http://www.roundcube.net
It's really eacy to install. Main thing is making sure you have PHP
5.2+ installed on Apache and also configuring your MySQL database
which is super
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 05:21:54PM +0200, Julius Thijssen wrote:
Hmm.. the reason I wanted to do this is precisely because it already caused
harm
by upsetting silly users that worried they were doing something wrong in the
way their clients were configged. Explaining that it does no harm is
Hello everyone,
can postfix automatically create delivery notification info for every
sent message and store it in another mailbox? Thanks.
Best Regards,
Dr.Pesko
Robert Lopez:
This is one of a few problem areas in main.cf I have found. They all seem to
involve at lease the syntax of parameter assignment. The following is from
working email gateways running postfix 2.2.10.
The value of the assignment consists of tokens separated by commas and by
Scott Haneda a écrit :
On May 18, 2009, at 8:08 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 17-May-2009, at 19:44, Carlos Williams wrote:
u...@mail.myserver.com
myserver.com is a real domain name. Is it YOUR domain name? Somehow I
doubt it.
Thank you for pointing this out. I feel bad for anyone at domain,
Am 12.5.2009 15:17 Uhr, Wietse Venema schrieb:
Postfix stable release 2.6.0 is available. After Postfix was declared
complete with version 2.3, the focus has moved towards improving
the code/documentation, and updating it for changing environments.
I've updated the Solaris packages to 2.6.0
Dr.Pesko a écrit :
Hello everyone,
can postfix automatically create delivery notification info for every
sent message and store it in another mailbox? Thanks.
it's unclear what you mean by delivery notification. if it's DSN, then
the client needs to request it.
but you probably want a
David Favro a écrit :
Friends,
What would be valuable (or at least interesting) to me is to treat the RDNS
lookup (peer address-name and subsequent name-address) as a part of
smtpd_client_restrictions, or in some way delay it until that time.
[snip]
The lookup result is used in the
I would like to issue a custom message for 550 5.1.1 errors, on a per-
user basis. In other words, instead of the generic
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table
that goes out now, I want the ability to override that with a message
saying something like:
* Mark Edwards m...@antsclimbtree.com:
I would like to issue a custom message for 550 5.1.1 errors, on a per-
user basis. In other words, instead of the generic
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table
that goes out now, I want the ability to override that with a
On May 19, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Mark Edwards m...@antsclimbtree.com:
I would like to issue a custom message for 550 5.1.1 errors, on a
per-
user basis. In other words, instead of the generic
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table
that
Hello,
I want to find out if there is a mail in the queue for two days using
find command.
However, creation time for the mails under /var/spool/postfix/deferred/
is always about 40 minutes ahead of my local time, I also noticed
that the time stamp for the mails in the queue changes and always
I'll see if I can make some time to build some 2.6 rpms, but am likely
to respond more if there are people who show an interest in these rpms
I build.
I too am interested and would like to try it. I have never used
anything beyond the vendor supplied version of Postfix but am tired of
waiting
tom lee:
Hello,
I want to find out if there is a mail in the queue for two days using
find command.
However, creation time for the mails under /var/spool/postfix/deferred/
is always about 40 minutes ahead of my local time, I also noticed
that the time stamp for the mails in the queue
Is there a better way or command to find out queued mails more than 2
days old instead of using find to search /var/spool/postfix/deferred/
Can you describe the problem, instead of the solution (locate
file older than N days)?
I need to write a script to scan the queue to be alerted before
Carlos Williams wrote, at 05/19/2009 02:04 PM:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Just E. Mail justem...@imwell-usa.com
wrote:
Thank you all.
I am going with roundcube: http://www.roundcube.net
It's really eacy to install. Main thing is making sure you have PHP
5.2+ installed on Apache
tom lee:
Is there a better way or command to find out queued mails more than 2
days old instead of using find to search /var/spool/postfix/deferred/
Can you describe the problem, instead of the solution (locate
file older than N days)?
I need to write a script to scan the queue to
mouss wrote:
you can find postfix-2.3.3-2.1.centos.mysql_pgsql.i386.rpm on
http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5.3/centosplus/i386/RPMS/
although it is old. the easiest way to install it is by using rpm -i
(to avoid any network problem, download it first and install it from disk).
After
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Just E. Mail
Sent: Wednesday, 20 May 2009 10:10 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Postfix with PostgreSQL
In my first post, I mentioned that I plan to use
with Postfix 2.3, but
it could not cause corruption before the change dated 20090427.
You can find Postfix version 2.6.1 at the mirrors listed at
http://www.postfix.org/
The same code is also available as Postfix snapshot 2.7-20090519.
Postfix versions 2.5 and earlier are not affected
I need to write a script to scan the queue to be alerted before the
mails start to bounce back.
That is what delay_warning_time is for.
Thanks. for my case, my postfix server is the relay server. once the
relay server cannot connect to the relayhost listed in relay server
main.cf,
It
I need to write a script to scan the queue to be alerted before the
mails start to bounce back.
That is what delay_warning_time is for.
delay_warning_time will let the sender get the email about the status
of mail in the queue.
what I want to do is to avoid to notify the sender but the
69 matches
Mail list logo
