On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:36:58PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jakub Nadolny:
Jul 8 12:43:33 zonk postfix/qmgr[7095]: DF7C21811E53:
from=sender.n...@mycompany.pl, size=4254293, nrcpt=2 (queue active)
Jul 8 13:33:40 zonk postfix/qmgr[16317]: DF7C21811E53: skipped, still
being delivered
Hi,
I have to build a mail system with one main server (main) who send mails
to several secondaries servers on the net as serv1, serv2, servX, for
the same domain but how to send mail from the serv1 to an user on the
serv2 for the same domain without got the user unknown reply on serv1
and
Hi,
im curious if there is a way how to present a per user statistics of
incoming/outgoing e-mails in time by graph. This is the situation:
postfix relay for a few domains and many users. I want to present (the best
will be via web, cacti for example...) these informations:
recieved, sent,
Jakub Nadolny:
[ Charset ISO-8859-2 unsupported, converting... ]
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:36:58PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jakub Nadolny:
Jul 8 12:43:33 zonk postfix/qmgr[7095]: DF7C21811E53:
from=sender.n...@mycompany.pl, size=4254293, nrcpt=2 (queue active)
Jul 8 13:33:40
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 07:15:05AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jakub Nadolny:
[ Charset ISO-8859-2 unsupported, converting... ]
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:36:58PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jakub Nadolny:
Jul 8 12:43:33 zonk postfix/qmgr[7095]: DF7C21811E53:
On Friday 10 July 2009 07:15:08 am Digest of postfix-users list wrote:
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:01:51 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?SmnFmcOtIEhsaW5rYQ==?= jiri.hli...@gmail.com
Subject: Per user graph statistics
- --0016e6d96751af30e4046e570fef
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Jakub Nadolny:
One SMTP client process was delivering message DF7C21811E53, and
that process hangs.
THIS IS WHY YOU SEE THE 'DF7C21811E53: SKIPPED,
STILL BEING DELIVERED' MESSAGE IN THE LOGFILE.
Normally, a watchdog timer will terminate such a process, and the
master will
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:50:29AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jakub Nadolny:
One SMTP client process was delivering message DF7C21811E53, and
that process hangs.
THIS IS WHY YOU SEE THE 'DF7C21811E53: SKIPPED,
STILL BEING DELIVERED' MESSAGE IN THE LOGFILE.
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:15:41PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Ignacio Garcia wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there. We use both postgrey and policyd-weight to block spam.
policyd-weight checks against several RBL and DNSBL so each time a mail
is received several
On Jul 10, 2009, at 5:44 AM, Sam Przyswa s...@arial-concept.com wrote:
Hi,
I have to build a mail system with one main server (main) who send
mails to several secondaries servers on the net as serv1, serv2,
servX, for the same domain but how to send mail from the serv1 to an
user on the
Hi,
I have a groupwise system and want to use postfix as a relay host for
virus scanning and spam checking.
Receiving mail from out the world and passing it on to groupwise works
smoothely.
But I want to scan mails that are sent via groupwise for viruses, too.
I have my groupwise server defined
On Friday 10 July 2009 09:24:33 am you wrote:
Hello Sean,
thanks for your answer. I already know about mailgraph. I read about cacti
templates based on mailgraph scripts too, but all tools i heard about are
monitoring just overall statistics.
If there is no script for this purpose yet, my
On Jul 9, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Scott Haneda:
Hello, I have been looking into this for the better part of today. I
am using a proxy in front of postfix. In order to be able to AUTH a
user through the proxy, the proxy needs the 250-AUTH credentials to
show up.
I discovered
Michael Fischer wrote:
Hi,
I have a groupwise system and want to use postfix as a relay host for
virus scanning and spam checking.
Receiving mail from out the world and passing it on to groupwise works
smoothely.
But I want to scan mails that are sent via groupwise for viruses, too.
I have my
From: skib...@wrladv.com
On Friday 10 July 2009 09:24:33 am you wrote:
Hello Sean,
thanks for your answer. I already know about mailgraph. I read about cacti
templates based on mailgraph scripts too, but all tools i heard about are
monitoring just overall statistics.
If there is no
Hi there,
I have postfix 2.5.1-2 and procmail 3.22-16ubu installed on an ubuntu
box. I am trying to figure out why mail is delivered to ~/mail instead
of the postconf ~/Maildir . Is it possible that the procmail delivery
rules are taking over. If you note postconf explicitly knows Maildir is
Admin wrote:
Hi there,
I have postfix 2.5.1-2 and procmail 3.22-16ubu installed on an ubuntu
box. I am trying to figure out why mail is delivered to ~/mail instead
of the postconf ~/Maildir . Is it possible that the procmail delivery
rules are taking over. If you note postconf explicitly
Alban Deniz:
Hi Wietse,
I ran a test case showing the unexpected filter response of SMFIR_ADDHEADER
to
the event SMFIC_MAIL. Here's a summary of my setup:
postfix is configured with the SNFMilter milter. The master.cf file contains
the
line:
smtp inet n - -
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:34:10 -0700
Admin ad...@enabled.com wrote:
Hi there,
I have postfix 2.5.1-2 and procmail 3.22-16ubu installed on an ubuntu
box. I am trying to figure out why mail is delivered to ~/mail
instead of the postconf ~/Maildir . Is it possible that the procmail
delivery
Does the problem go away when you NEVER invoke smfi_quarantine()?
The Postfix SMFIR_QUARANTINE implementation seems to be wrong.
Wietse
Hi Wietse,
Yes, the problem does go away when I run a version of SNFMilter that never
invokes smfi_quarantine(). I sent 1230 emails to postfix integrated with my
milter with no problem.
Also, when I did invoke smfi_quarantine(), the problem occurred after 12
messages.
What can I do to help
Alban Deniz:
Hi Wietse,
Yes, the problem does go away when I run a version of SNFMilter that never
invokes smfi_quarantine(). I sent 1230 emails to postfix integrated with my
milter with no problem.
Also, when I did invoke smfi_quarantine(), the problem occurred after 12
messages.
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:53:50AM -0400, wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:04:33PM -0400, wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
alias_maps = dbm:/etc/postfix/aliases, dbm:/etc/newcompany/aliases,
nis:mail.aliases
Are you sure you want a local aliases(5) file and not
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:42:44 -0700
Admin ad...@enabled.com wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:34:10 -0700
Admin ad...@enabled.com wrote:
Hi there,
I have postfix 2.5.1-2 and procmail 3.22-16ubu installed on an
ubuntu box. I am trying to figure out why mail is delivered
Hello, I am seeing a lot of these in my syslog logs. I am not sure
what they mean, google did not yield a lot other than people calling
out an incorrctly named cert/key
system.log:Jul 10 00:07:57 trex postfix/smtpd[45598]: warning: TLS
library problem: 45598:error:140760FC:SSL
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Scott Haneda wrote:
system.log:Jul 10 00:07:57 trex postfix/smtpd[45598]: warning: TLS
library problem: 45598:error:140760FC:SSL
routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol:s23_srvr.c:571:
Debug the proxy. What is it? Not Postfix, I'd guess.
--
Sahil Tandon
Scott Haneda:
Hello, I am seeing a lot of these in my syslog logs. I am not sure
what they mean, google did not yield a lot other than people calling
out an incorrctly named cert/key
system.log:Jul 10 00:07:57 trex postfix/smtpd[45598]: warning: TLS
library problem:
Dear All,
Is it possible to allow a group of unauthenticated senders while other
senders are authenticated.
Regards
Priscilla
priscilla wrote:
Dear All,
Is it possible to allow a group of unauthenticated senders while other
senders are authenticated.
Yes, maybe.
How do you intend to identify these senders?
--
Andrew Thompson
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, Andrew Thompson wrote:
priscilla wrote:
Is it possible to allow a group of unauthenticated senders while other
senders are authenticated.
Yes, maybe.
How do you intend to identify these senders?
Also clarify what you mean by allow. Can you give two simple examples
30 matches
Mail list logo