Wietse,
Thank you for your fast reply.
On 2 juin 2010, at 17:28, Wietse Venema wrote:
If Postfix does not accept connections, then it will log warnings.
No warning on postfix side, otherwise I would have posted a sample here of
course.
This is a big jump between 2.0.10 and 2.7. I was not
Hi Victor,
On 2 juin 2010, at 18:49, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 05:14:45PM +0200, Proniewski Patrick wrote:
So it appears that the connection between MAILGW and LB is not always
properly closed. Am I wrong?
On our postfix servers , we use a remote ldapserver for system-auth for
some FM users. System users login via /etc/shadow .. FM users login via
ldap.
The MTA is not configured to use any ldap connection.
Yet whenever postfix is being restarted , If the remote ldapserver is
not available
Hi Ram
apparently, its not postfix itself, which connects to LDAP, but the nss
library, which brings up the following idea:
postfix, when starting up, wants to verify the user it shall run under,
which is done via the nss library. If this user is not a unix user, the
nss library will try to
Ram:
Jun 4 14:53:00 mmail postfix/smtpd[23565]: nss_ldap: reconnecting to
LDAP server (sleeping 4 seconds)...
To make Postfix work while LDAP is down, put the Postfix-related
users and groups in /etc/passwd, or remove LDAP from /etc/nsswitch.conf.
Wietse
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010, Paul McGougan wrote:
On 4/06/2010 1:08 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
That's unfortunate. Now that we have established the issue, it seems to
me this is no longer the appropriate forum to continue this thread.
Perhaps you can convince the host to exempt you from the
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
This is entirely inappropriate and unnecessary.
Well, I must admit, I got heated up a bit in this discussion, and should have
rethinked my words more before posting.
Sorry about that, and my apologies to Moe.
--
MfG Jan
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Proniewski Patrick:
Wietse,
Thank you for your fast reply.
On 2 juin 2010, at 17:28, Wietse Venema wrote:
If Postfix does not accept connections, then it will log warnings.
No warning on postfix side, otherwise I would have posted a sample here of
course.
This is a big jump
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 5:44 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: DIsable connects to ldap
Ram:
Jun 4 14:53:00 mmail postfix/smtpd[23565]: nss_ldap:
On 4 juin 2010, at 15:03, Wietse Venema wrote:
I suppose you missed the Postfix RELEASE_NOTES files. I spend a
great deal of time maintaining this document, in the hope that it
will save system adminstrators time.
You're absolutely right. I always read the release notes before an upgrade,
Ram:
Jun 4 14:53:00 mmail postfix/smtpd[23565]: nss_ldap: reconnecting to
LDAP server (sleeping 4 seconds)...
To make Postfix work while LDAP is down, put the Postfix-related
users and groups in /etc/passwd, or remove LDAP from /etc/nsswitch.conf.
(and in /etc/group and /etc/shadow).
So postini wants me to add there servers into the my_network list. To
only accept e-mail from there servers. To me this is wrong. For send
mail they wanted the below setup. Now from what I could find. Should I
not be able to add the ip numbers or ranges to my access file.
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:53:58AM -0600, Josh Cason wrote:
So postini wants me to add there servers into the my_network list.
They are giving you the simplest solution to explain, not the best one.
To only
accept e-mail from there servers. To me this is wrong. For send mail they
wanted
postini give access
telnet postini 25
mail from:herc...@hercule.eu
rcpt to:youareinh...@youareinhome.fr
data
some date
.
emails is correctly delivred
its synonymy to open relay
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of fakessh
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 11:56 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Postini, Has bad idea for adding ip numbers. This is sendmail
example
postini give
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 12:27:56PM -0500, Dan Burkland wrote:
For my Postfix + Postini setup I have the following configuration
options set:
relayhost = PostiniFQDNGoeshHere
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, PostiniIPBLockGoesHere
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
On 06/04/2010 03:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Moe:
The docs for 'myhostname' even explicitly state The default is to use
the fully-qualified domain name from gethostname(), which makes no
sense as gethostname() does not normally return a FQDN.
Only a brain-damaged person would claim
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:59:28PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
I think the manual is at best misleading in this statement.
This thread is over I think...
--
Viktor.
I'm just a tad confused.
I currently only have one check client access file. That is
/etc/postfix/access. Do I need another check client access file with
postini's ip range?
As below I do have a senders access list. But I don't have a recipient
access list because this is mysql under
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 12:37:14PM -0600, Josh Cason wrote:
I'm just a tad confused.
I currently only have one check client access file. That is
/etc/postfix/access. Do I need another check client access file with
postini's ip range?
I recommended a CIDR access file, e.g.:
# CIDR
On 2010-06-04 1:27 PM, Dan Burkland wrote:
For my Postfix + Postini setup I have the following configuration options
set:
relayhost = PostiniFQDNGoeshHere
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, PostiniIPBLockGoesHere
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
On 2010-06-04 2:37 PM, Josh Cason wrote:
my sender_access list.
aol.com reject_unverified_sender
hotmail.com reject_unverified_sender
yahoo.com reject_unverified_sender
gmail.com reject_unverified_sender
bigfoot.com reject_unverified_sender
apa...@dolifrontend1.installs.com OK
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 14:58, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Phil Howard:
It looks like postmap can read stdin when getting a list of keys for
delete or query.
As documented in the postmap manpage:
-d key
...
If a key value of - is specified, the
Okay So I want to convert my access list into a cidr list. Since
postini has a simple cidr. The problem is I have some
nos...@nospam.com addresses in the access list as well as ip numbers.
Can I move the addresses to the check_sender_access list?
This is what is in my access list. But from
I have google apps managing mail for my domain but would like to use my
server to send newsletters and have run into an issue where I can send with
SMTP from accounts on the server using Postfix but when someone replies to
that email due to MX it routes to google and not the server.
What do I
On 6/4/2010 3:45 PM, Cameron Smith wrote:
I have google apps managing mail for my domain but would like to use my
server to send newsletters and have run into an issue where I can send
with SMTP from accounts on the server using Postfix but when someone
replies to that email due to MX it
On 6/4/2010 2:45 PM, Cameron Smith wrote:
I have google apps managing mail for my domain but would like to use my
server to send newsletters and have run into an issue where I can send
with SMTP from accounts on the server using Postfix but when someone
replies to that email due to MX it routes
Hello all,
I have been trying to setup my Postfix server as follows:
a) Clients need to use STARTTLS + Authentication in order to send mail using my
SMTP Server. They can only submit mail on port 587 (25 for submission is
disallowed).
b) Port 25 is to be used for MTA-to-MTA communication and
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 16:21, Dan Burkland dburk...@nmdp.org wrote:
---main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination
---master.cf---
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o
-Original Message-
From: Phil Howard [mailto:ttip...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 3:48 PM
To: Dan Burkland
Cc: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Submission service
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 16:21, Dan Burkland dburk...@nmdp.org wrote:
---main.cf
-Original Message-
My apologies, I typed the parameter in the email incorrectly. It is entered
correctly in main.cf
(smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject)
Regards,
Dan
-Original Message-
Seems like I am dyslexic today, I meant to say master.cf (TGIF :))
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 16:52, Dan Burkland dburk...@nmdp.org wrote:
My apologies, I typed the parameter in the email incorrectly. It is entered
correctly in main.cf
(smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject)
OK, then that looks fine. Since you are having trouble on port
Dan Burkland:
Hello all,
I have been trying to setup my Postfix server as follows:
a) Clients need to use STARTTLS + Authentication in order to send mail using
my SMTP Server. They can only submit mail on port 587 (25 for submission is
disallowed).
b) Port 25 is to be used for
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 17:16, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
You need -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
to get relay permissions.
Is that for the submission entry or the smtp entry (that he didn't
provide)? It looks to me like he used mostly the
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 01:57:17PM -0600, Josh Cason wrote:
Okay So I want to convert my access list into a cidr list. Since postini
has a simple cidr. The problem is I have some nos...@nospam.com addresses
in the access list as well as ip numbers. Can I move the addresses to the
Phil Howard:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 17:16, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
You need -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
to get relay permissions.
Is that for the submission entry or the smtp entry (that he didn't
provide)?
Allow me to place my
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010, Dan Burkland wrote:
Relevant configuration entries:
---main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination
^
---master.cf---
submissioninetn - n - - smtpd
I'm finding the following in my mail log:
Jun 4 08:55:11 blacklamb postfix/smtpd[95132]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from outmail008.snc1.tfbnw.net[69.63.178.167]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
Client host [69.63.178.167] blocked using bl.spamcop.net; Blocked - see
On 6/4/2010 6:29 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
I'm finding the following in my mail log:
Jun 4 08:55:11 blacklamb postfix/smtpd[95132]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from outmail008.snc1.tfbnw.net[69.63.178.167]: 554 5.7.1 Service
unavailable;
Client host [69.63.178.167] blocked using bl.spamcop.net;
On 06/05/2010 01:29 AM, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
I'm finding the following in my mail log:
Jun 4 08:55:11 blacklamb postfix/smtpd[95132]: NOQUEUE: reject:
RCPT from outmail008.snc1.tfbnw.net[69.63.178.167]:
That is where it comes from; this is what check_client_access checks.
554 5.7.1
On 6/4/2010 6:59 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
Client host [69.63.178.167] blocked using bl.spamcop.net; Blocked - see
http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?69.63.178.167;
from=notification+o=6pg...@facebookmail.com
to=d...@mykitchentable.net proto=ESMTP
On 6/4/2010 6:59 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
Client host [69.63.178.167] blocked using bl.spamcop.net; Blocked - see
http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?69.63.178.167;
from=notification+o=6pg...@facebookmail.com
to=d...@mykitchentable.net proto=ESMTP
On 6/4/2010 7:12 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 6/4/2010 6:59 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
Client host [69.63.178.167] blocked using bl.spamcop.net; Blocked - see
http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?69.63.178.167;
from=notification+o=6pg...@facebookmail.com
On 6/4/2010 7:12 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 6/4/2010 6:59 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
Client host [69.63.178.167] blocked using bl.spamcop.net; Blocked
- see
http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?69.63.178.167;
from=notification+o=6pg...@facebookmail.com
On 6/4/2010 8:10 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 6/4/2010 7:12 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 6/4/2010 6:59 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
Client host [69.63.178.167] blocked using bl.spamcop.net; Blocked
- see
http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?69.63.178.167;
Clearly we are no good with email servers, so we come to the experts.
Centos 5.3, dbmail, postfix, pgsql. All up and running.
1. Outgoing mail works fine.
2. Incoming we get the
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table
virtual
queries return the 1 and empty per dbmail
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 08:23:56PM -0700, George wrote:
Clearly we are no good with email servers, so we come to the experts.
Also, not too strong on asking questions that can be answered. :-(
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local
47 matches
Mail list logo
