Asif Iqbal:
Is there a nice diagram of these flow charts
http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html
Postfix beta has a big-picture.gif file. Postfix as evolved since
then, and it is no longer practical to put everything into one diagram.
Wietse
I was looking for something like one with
How about publishing an SPF record for postfix.org.
This would work well:
v=spf1 mx include:cloud9.net ~all
http://openspf.org/
http://old.openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=Postfix.org
On 07/03/2010 08:45 PM, junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
How about publishing an SPF record for postfix.org.
This would work well:
v=spf1 mx include:cloud9.net ~all
http://openspf.org/
http://old.openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=Postfix.org
Um.. and then what ?
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 11:45:39 -0700, junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
How about publishing an SPF record for postfix.org.
Why?
--
Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have the admin for the CISCO PIX disable the stupid
smtp fixup garbage on the CISCO box.
As far as I know, there is NEVER any reason to have this enabled on an
internet facing
Hi,
Does anyone know backported Postfix 2.6.x or 2.7.x RPM packages for RHEL5?
Thank you.
Best regards,
Morten
Morten P.D. Stevens put forth on 7/3/2010 2:40 PM:
Hi,
Does anyone know backported Postfix 2.6.x or 2.7.x RPM packages for RHEL5?
This binary rpm is for x86-64 only:
http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.7/RPMS-rhel5-x86_64/postfix-2.7.1-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
You'll have to google more than I did to
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:53:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Morten P.D. Stevens put forth on 7/3/2010 2:40 PM:
Does anyone know backported Postfix 2.6.x or 2.7.x RPM packages
for RHEL5?
This binary rpm is for x86-64 only:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have the admin for the CISCO PIX disable the stupid
smtp fixup garbage on the CISCO box.
As far as I know, there is
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have the admin for the CISCO PIX disable the stupid
smtp fixup garbage on the CISCO box.
As far
On 07/03/2010 11:20 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have the admin for the CISCO PIX disable the stupid
smtp fixup
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 11:20 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have the admin for the CISCO PIX disable
On 07/03/2010 11:24 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 11:20 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:24:20PM -0700, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 11:20 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this
issue?
What
On 07/03/2010 11:38 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:24:20PM -0700, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 11:20 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Stan Hoeppner
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 9:54 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Postfix 2.7 for RHEL 5?
Morten P.D. Stevens put forth on 7/3/2010 2:40 PM:
Hi All
I am planning to migrate from qmail to postfix.
Currently our qmail uses QMAILQUEUE, qmail-scanner, clamd,
spamassassin, rbldnsd, greylite, qmail-pop, qmail-ldap, virtuals and
ezmlm.
(I hope I did not miss anything)
I found few suggestions from the following articles
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Asif Iqbal vad...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
I am planning to migrate from qmail to postfix.
Currently our qmail uses QMAILQUEUE, qmail-scanner, clamd,
spamassassin, rbldnsd, greylite, qmail-pop, qmail-ldap, virtuals and
ezmlm.
(I hope I did not miss anything)
Have you verified your MTA's are not on a Black/Block list? Maybe
draxlerinsurance.com has firewalled you off. I know I would.
http://www.mxtoolbox.com/blacklists.aspx
[r...@vps1 ~]# telnet 67.227.17.37 25
Trying 67.227.17.37...
Connected to 67.227.17.37.
Escape character is '^]'.
220
Oh and here is another thought.
Go back to the very first failure occurrence for draxlerinsurance.com and
see what the cause of that very first rejection was.
--
From: junkyardma...@verizon.net
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 7:42 PM
To: Asai
20 matches
Mail list logo
