* Peter Evans pe...@ixp.jp:
I would like to direct all mail from places with no reverse dns into
a big bit-bucket. Obviously something like 95% of those mails would be
going to a bogus address.
reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
Would:
header_checks =
I am looking to into configure postfix with the captioned feature, does
anyone has a pointer for me to follow?
many thanks,
- joe
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:39, Dominik Storck domi...@storck.net wrote:
This has been working perfectly for years. Now the number of recipients
for some of
these lists have increased to more than 200.
When a mail is sent to these recipients mail delivery starts as expected
but stops
short
Various sender domains use MX records like mail.spam.domain that point
to an IP that has a DSL PTR record, like 123-345-78-9.dsl.some.provid.er
Can I catch those using a table entry like
/\.dsl\.some\.provid\.er$/ result
?
Or would I have to use their IP or their A record, e.g.
On 8/4/2010 9:33 PM, Peter Evans wrote:
I have an experiment I would like to perform but I am uncertain
how to do it without breaking everything else.
I would like to direct all mail from places with no reverse dns into
a big bit-bucket. Obviously something like 95% of those mails would be
On 8/5/2010 5:10 AM, Joe Wong wrote:
I am looking to into configure postfix with the captioned
feature, does anyone has a pointer for me to follow?
many thanks,
- joe
Here's the basic outline. Adjust for your purposes.
http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html#external
--
On 8/5/2010 7:05 AM, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
Various sender domains use MX records like mail.spam.domain
that point to an IP that has a DSL PTR record, like
123-345-78-9.dsl.some.provid.er
Can I catch those using a table entry like
/\.dsl\.some\.provid\.er$/ result
?
Or would I have to use
On 8/4/2010 6:01 PM, Bill Gee wrote:
Hello everyone -
I have my Postfix server set up to reject mail from servers which are unknown
in DNS. Normally that is a good thing, but every now and then I run across
one that I want to accept mail from.
I have tried several ways to set up the
Hello I have a server having 2 IP addresses running 2 postfix managing
different domains
When the fisrt one need to relay an email for the second one I get this
smtp[4488]: 91F162240CB: to=b...@xxx.yyy.zzz, relay=none,
delay=0.08, delays=0.07/0.01/0/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for
Thanks Noel, this information has helped me as well.
Hi,
I'm running postfix with amavisd-new, spamassassin-v3.2.5, and clamav
and for some reason the Received headers are either being stripped or
not properly inserted on mail that is not spam. Messages in the
amavisd quarantine have their full headers.
Some non-spam messages have Received
On 8/5/2010 1:30 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I'm running postfix with amavisd-new, spamassassin-v3.2.5, and clamav
and for some reason the Received headers are either being stripped or
not properly inserted on mail that is not spam. Messages in the
amavisd quarantine have their full headers.
Some
On 8/5/2010 1:25 PM, Alain Spineux wrote:
Hello I have a server having 2 IP addresses running 2 postfix managing
different domains
When the fisrt one need to relay an email for the second one I get this
smtp[4488]: 91F162240CB: to=b...@xxx.yyy.zzz, relay=none,
delay=0.08, delays=0.07/0.01/0/0,
Yes
This is what I was looking for !
I will test it later
Thanks
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 8/5/2010 1:25 PM, Alain Spineux wrote:
Hello I have a server having 2 IP addresses running 2 postfix managing
different domains
When the fisrt one
On 08/03/2010 02:05 AM, Edward avanti wrote:
Halo Noel,
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
It appear from more investigation this cause is SERVFAIL
always send 4xx, can postifx override to 5xx with
On 08/01/2010 08:42 PM, Mike Morris wrote:
On 08/01/2010 02:37 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 08/01/2010 04:11 AM, Mike Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a mail server deployment that will only have one server
for MX and SASL submission purposes. Generally I like to have separate
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 11:02 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
You should remove your smtpd_client_restrictions and
smtpd_helo_restrictions (and smtpd_sender_restrictions if
you're using it) and put everything under smtpd_recipient
restrictions arranged like so:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
#
Some non-spam messages have Received headers, but they are always
internal non-routable addresses. The majority of the messages have no
Received headers at all.
...
Check your header_checks file for IGNORE rules.
Ah, thanks very much. I should have known to check for something like that.
Why
Hello.
I'm trying to convince Postfix to send mail only thru a specific
interface/IP address (only one would be nice, many but not all would be
better).
- inet_interfaces isn't suited for the job as it seems to be for
The network interface addresses that this mail system receives mail
smtp_bind_address = x.x.x.x
On 08/06/2010 01:00 AM, Arthur Titeica wrote:
Hello.
I'm trying to convince Postfix to send mail only thru a specific
interface/IP address (only one would be nice, many but not all would
be better).
- inet_interfaces isn't suited for the job as it seems to be for
The network interface
On 8/5/2010 2:26 PM, Alex wrote:
Some non-spam messages have Received headers, but they are always
internal non-routable addresses. The majority of the messages have no
Received headers at all.
...
Check your header_checks file for IGNORE rules.
Ah, thanks very much. I should have known to
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:33:07 -0700, Walter Pinto wal...@amhosting.com
wrote:
smtp_bind_address = x.x.x.x
I knew I forgot something :)
I've tried that in master.cf in the form
smtp inet n - - - 30 smtpd
-o smtp_bind_address=94.62.132.84
-o
inet_interfaces - contols which IP addresses that Postfix listens on.
smtp_bind_address - specifies which IP address to send email from.
That's all I know
I may be wrong, but I believe when you change those settings, a
postfix reload might not work. You may need to stop and start the
service.
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:48:42 -0700, Walter Pinto wal...@amhosting.com
wrote:
I may be wrong, but I believe when you change those settings, a
postfix reload might not work. You may need to stop and start the
service.
Oh, I know... the server suffered a full restart even.
Thanks for the input so
On 8/5/2010 3:39 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote:
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:33:07 -0700, Walter Pintowal...@amhosting.com
wrote:
smtp_bind_address = x.x.x.x
I knew I forgot something :)
I've tried that in master.cf in the form
smtp inet n - - - 30 smtpd
-o
On 8/5/2010 2:20 PM, Adam Lanier wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 11:02 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
You should remove your smtpd_client_restrictions and
smtpd_helo_restrictions (and smtpd_sender_restrictions if
you're using it) and put everything under smtpd_recipient
restrictions arranged like so:
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 14:58 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
What's the advantage of having all checks in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
The biggest advantage occurs when you must use a whitelist.
If you use the multiple smtpd_*_restrictions sections you need
to make sure to use your
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:57:48 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
grkni...@scent-team.com wrote:
On 8/5/2010 3:39 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote:
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:33:07 -0700, Walter Pintowal...@amhosting.com
wrote:
smtp_bind_address = x.x.x.x
I knew I forgot something :)
I've tried that in
On 08/05/2010 11:57 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 08/01/2010 08:42 PM, Mike Morris wrote:
On 08/01/2010 02:37 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 08/01/2010 04:11 AM, Mike Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a mail server deployment that will only have one server
for MX and SASL submission
On 8/5/2010 4:09 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote:
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:57:48 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
grkni...@scent-team.com wrote:
On 8/5/2010 3:39 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote:
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:33:07 -0700, Walter Pintowal...@amhosting.com
wrote:
smtp_bind_address = x.x.x.x
I knew
Arthur, why not just set it in the main.cf ?
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:21:08 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
grkni...@scent-team.com wrote:
On 8/5/2010 4:09 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote:
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:57:48 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
grkni...@scent-team.com wrote:
On 8/5/2010 3:39 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote:
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010
On 08/05/2010 10:15 PM, Mike Morris wrote:
On 08/05/2010 11:57 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 08/01/2010 08:42 PM, Mike Morris wrote:
On 08/01/2010 02:37 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 08/01/2010 04:11 AM, Mike Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a mail server
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:35:59 -0700, Walter Pinto wal...@amhosting.com
wrote:
Arthur, why not just set it in the main.cf ?
Because, as I understand it, in main.cf smtp_bind_address only accepts
*one* interface, not many but not all as I need.
--
Arthur Titeica
Hi,
Outside of the obvious reason to purposely prevent them from being
written to the message, what use does this have? Strip any
non-internal headers for privacy, perhaps?
...
External headers should never be removed. The lines are probably someone
trying to remove internal headers -- a
Makes sense.
fine. but, c'mon. that's no reason to reinvent the wheel.
autoconf/automake do this in a way that's already
familiar to everyone. if you use the standard stuff
you save everybody grief.
One problem with that analogy is that not everyone is familiar with what
you think of as standard stuff.
39 matches
Mail list logo
