Hello
Would it be possible to duplicate all incoming email
for a domain to two mailhubs ?
| prod mailhub
ncoming emails -- MX ---|
| bkup mailhub
I imagine the best would be to use
hello, excuse but my english is terrible i know, what do you mean that
if one of the host is down mail is accessible anyway from every user?,
with configuration of more host and more mx records? but every mx record
have a different priority ? or it's not important.
If one of the hosts is down
hello, excuse but my english is terrible i know, what do you mean that
if one of the host is down mail is accessible anyway from every user?,
with configuration of more host and more mx records? but every mx record
have a different priority ? or it's not important.
If one of the hosts is down
Dear Team,
How to improve postfix performance to sending the email.
Please guide ?
Thanks Regards,
Ravindra Gupta
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Frank Bonnet f.bon...@esiee.fr wrote:
Hello
Would it be possible to duplicate all incoming email
for a domain to two mailhubs ?
One of our servers is seeing deferrals for yahoo mails.
According to yahoo's recommendation , they dont like more than 20 mails
in one connection
How do I configure postfix ( version 2.7 ) to do this.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_connection_reuse_time_limit
Specifies only
Hi,
I have developed PHP and MySQL web application which sending mails to
postfix by using fsockopen command.
Whenever there is no mailq then mail sending is very fast almost 1000 in
6-10 seconds. (i.e. it sends almost 100-200 mails per second).
But whenever I send bulk mails then most of the
On 11/19/2010 3:06 AM, Ramprasad wrote:
One of our servers is seeing deferrals for yahoo mails.
According to yahoo's recommendation , they dont like more than 20 mails
in one connection
How do I configure postfix ( version 2.7 ) to do this.
Len Conrad:
Had a power failure on a linux RHEL and postfix. disk got messed up a little
bit but linux seemed to fix it up. all apps and services are running except
postfix.
I've had this problem before on another machine, and it was permissions.
postfix set-permissions
...
Ravindra Gupta // Viva:
Dear Team,
How to improve postfix performance to sending the email.
DO NOT REPLY TO OLD MAIL WHEN ASKING A NEW QUESTION
Frank Bonnet:
Hello
Would it be possible to duplicate all incoming email
for a domain to two mailhubs ?
| prod mailhub
ncoming emails -- MX ---|
| bkup mailhub
I
Avinash Pawar // Viva:
Hi,
I have developed PHP and MySQL web application which sending mails to
postfix by using fsockopen command.
Whenever there is no mailq then mail sending is very fast almost 1000 in
6-10 seconds. (i.e. it sends almost 100-200 mails per second).
But whenever I
Hi,
I also noticed the number of TCP connections by *ss -s *command
Whenever it goes beyond 900 then mail sending speed is 5-6 mails per second.
When the connections are below 900 then the mail sending speed is 100-200.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
Avinash Pawar // Viva:
Hi,
I also noticed the number of TCP connections by *ss -s *command
Postfix uses one process per TCP connection - one SMTP client
or one SMTP server, depending on the direction.
Whenever it goes beyond 900 then mail sending speed is 5-6 mails per second.
When the
So I have a company that I've regretfully registered my email address
with and they wont stop sending me messages. I've tried over and over and they
tell me they don't recognize my email address but clearly they're
sending me promotional messages daily. I'm running Postfix 2.7.1 and
would like to
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Jacqui Caren-home
jacqui.ca...@ntlworld.com wrote:
(smtp.burketown.bluehornet.com [67.216.225.254])
by mail.iamghost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDF81405D7
Is the important line.
They are snowshoing across the 67.216.224.0/23 range - nasty!
What is
I assume postfix is not affected since smtpd is not multi-threaded?
http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20101116.txt
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30
hi all
how can i whitelist a particular user (infact it's a user account which
send virusalerts from the relays to the pop server) from smtp
authentication.
i've attached the postconf output
ty
help appreciated
-bharathan
inet_protocols = all
myhostname = mail.exmaple.com
myorigin =
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:55:44 -0500
From: victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Invalid response code: 503 5.7.0 Error: access denied
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:27:20PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
I had a similar patch that I was going to post
At 06:09 AM 11/19/2010, you wrote:
Len Conrad:
Had a power failure on a linux RHEL and postfix. disk got messed up a
little bit but linux seemed to fix it up. all apps and services are running
except postfix.
I've had this problem before on another machine, and it was permissions.
Wietse:
I had a similar patch that I was going to post 30 mins ago when
someone walked into my room:
Victor:
OK, we are on the same page then.
George Forman:
I've made the change to my local code base. Will this change make
it into a 2.7.x release or 2.8?
It is in Postfix 2.8. I haven't
Len Conrad:
The scan dir ownership was fixed by running postfix-install. not
sure how another guy detected that scan was bad ownership, since
that finding was not logged after I moved the scan/* msgs out.
I've moved the 2176 msgs back to scan and set them to postfix:wheel,
but there they
At 09:12 AM 11/19/2010, you wrote:
Len Conrad:
The scan dir ownership was fixed by running postfix-install. not
sure how another guy detected that scan was bad ownership, since
that finding was not logged after I moved the scan/* msgs out.
I've moved the 2176 msgs back to scan and set them
Len Conrad:
At 09:12 AM 11/19/2010, you wrote:
Len Conrad:
The scan dir ownership was fixed by running postfix-install. not
sure how another guy detected that scan was bad ownership, since
that finding was not logged after I moved the scan/* msgs out.
I've moved the 2176 msgs back to
Len Conrad:
At 09:12 AM 11/19/2010, you wrote:
Len Conrad:
The scan dir ownership was fixed by running postfix-install. not
sure how another guy detected that scan was bad ownership, since
that finding was not logged after I moved the scan/* msgs out.
I've moved the 2176 msgs back to
I have a Postfix mail gateway behind a security appliance.
The mail gateway has a published public IP of the security appliance.
On all my Postfix servers I am routing mail for root to an off network email
address using an entry in /etc/aliases
They all work fine except for the root account on
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:12:43 -0500
From: victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Invalid response code: 503 5.7.0 Error: access denied
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:08:19AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse:
I had a similar patch that I was
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 03:44:15PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I assume postfix is not affected since smtpd is not multi-threaded?
http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20101116.txt
Correct. We also don't have an in-memory SSL session cache in the Postfix
SMTP client. We do have a 1-element
hi there ! I have an issue with the generic maps table and wonder if anyone
can help ?
we wish to deliver the output of root's cron jobs to our noc team. we have
therefore set an entry in /etc/aliases which sends root's mail to
n...@domain.com
unfortunately the hosts sending the mail announce
Cameron Smith put forth on 11/19/2010 11:13 AM:
I have a Postfix mail gateway behind a security appliance.
The mail gateway has a published public IP of the security appliance.
On all my Postfix servers I am routing mail for root to an off network email
address using an entry in /etc/aliases
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 05:30:20PM +, Andrew Hall wrote:
we wish to deliver the output of root's cron jobs to our noc team. we have
therefore set an entry in /etc/aliases which sends root's mail to
n...@domain.com
Presumably you are posting to this list because the systems running the
Len Conrad:
I did say fixed by running postfix-install, wasn't clear that
postfix-install fixed postfix fail-to-run problem.
For the record, I take no responsibility for what happens when
Postfix is run on a corrupted file system. Just like I take no
responsibility for what happens when Postfix
Len Conrad wrote:
Len Conrad:
At 09:12 AM 11/19/2010, you wrote:
Len Conrad:
The scan dir ownership was fixed by running postfix-install. not
sure how another guy detected that scan was bad ownership, since
that finding was not logged after I moved the scan/* msgs out.
I've moved the 2176
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:09:02PM +, Andrew Hall wrote:
On 19 November 2010 17:40, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
Probably using hash:/etc/postfix/generic in main.cf, when regexp:
is what you tested.
Thanks for the prompt reply Victor. You raise
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:05:12PM +0530, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
I also noticed the number of TCP connections by *ss -s *command
Whenever it goes beyond 900 then mail sending speed is 5-6 mails per second.
When the connections are below 900 then the mail sending speed is 100-200.
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:05:12PM +0530, Avinash Pawar // Viva wrote:
I also noticed the number of TCP connections by *ss -s *command
Whenever it goes beyond 900 then mail sending speed is 5-6 mails per second.
When the connections are below 900 then the mail sending
Please keep messages on list. ;)
Cameron Smith put forth on 11/19/2010 1:37 PM:
The public IP of the NAT appliance is the only public IP and all web traffic
and outbound mail traffic rout through this point so the DNS A record for
the Postfix Mail gateway has been made to match that IP for
On 11/19/2010 05:56 PM, Len Conrad wrote:
I did say fixed by running postfix-install, wasn't clear that postfix-install
fixed postfix fail-to-run problem.
fsck or whatever Linux RH does to fix filesystems apparently converted private/scan=
socket to private/scan dir, into which we got 2176
If I were to place this in my main.cf file:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
...
reject_plaintext_session
Wouldn't that effectively enforce TLS or am I failing to understand the
directive?
--
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_
On 11/19/2010 09:59 PM, Jerry wrote:
If I were to place this in my main.cf file:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
...
reject_plaintext_session
Wouldn't that effectively enforce TLS or am I failing to understand the
directive?
Yes.
To enforce TLS, use
smtpd_tls_security_options =
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:55:28PM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 11/19/2010 05:56 PM, Len Conrad wrote:
I did say fixed by running postfix-install, wasn't clear that
postfix-install fixed postfix fail-to-run problem.
fsck or whatever Linux RH does to fix filesystems apparently converted
On 11/19/2010 3:03 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 11/19/2010 09:59 PM, Jerry wrote:
If I were to place this in my main.cf file:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
...
reject_plaintext_session
Wouldn't that effectively enforce TLS or am I failing to
understand the
directive?
Yes.
Yes,
On 11/18/2010 03:11 PM, Jerry wrote:
To a point I would agree with you. I have often wondered what moron
came up with certain standards that are now in effect.
That would be the morons without whom you would not HAVE internet.
Get a clue, please.
--
J.
On 11/18/2010 05:44 AM, George Forman wrote:
What's going on postfix-us...@postfix.org? Making money from home is
the new thing, you've gotta get on this. I want you to get in on this
with me, I've already make $1200 this week. Go to this article and go
over it then get the kit on the page,
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:03:11 +0100
Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl articulated:
Yes.
To enforce TLS, use
smtpd_tls_security_options = encrypt
If you were to add reject_plaintext_session to your *client*
restrictions, any attempt at STARTTLS would fail, and you would never
receive
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 04:43:24PM -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:03:11 +0100
Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl articulated:
Yes.
To enforce TLS, use
smtpd_tls_security_options = encrypt
If you were to add reject_plaintext_session to your *client*
restrictions,
On 19 November 2010 19:52, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
If the UTF-8 is not mangled: naïveté
It isn't mangled and thankyou for the correction.
http://www.postfix.org/regexp_table.5.html
http://www.postfix.org/pcre_table.5.html
Thanks for these links.
Adrian P. van Bloois:
THe RC2 is around for ages, is the final release coming up soon???
When I have time. I won't react kindly to attempts to increase pressure.
Wietse
Le 19/11/2010 19:09, Andrew Hall a écrit :
On 19 November 2010 17:40, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
mailto:victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
Probably using hash:/etc/postfix/generic in main.cf
http://main.cf, when regexp:
is what you tested.
Thanks for
Le 18/11/2010 10:15, Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit :
* J. Roeleveldjo...@antarean.org:
Hi All,
I've been having issues where emails are being rejected by Cyrus because the
From address contains an underscore in the domain name.
Envelope or header?
Example address: u...@lists_example.org
What I
Le 19/11/2010 22:22, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 11/18/2010 03:11 PM, Jerry wrote:
To a point I would agree with you. I have often wondered what moron
came up with certain standards that are now in effect.
That would be the morons without whom you would not HAVE internet.
Get a clue,
Hello
Following online documentation I have properly set up a secondary back up mx
server (for domain example.com) which relay email properly to primary.
But there is a problem with how to have mails generated automatically
such as mails from cron delivered to fully qualified example.com
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:25 PM, zhong ming wu mr.z.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
On backup server, postconf -n
alias_maps =
inet_interfaces = 9.8.7.6
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8
myorigin = example.com
Please igore my post as I've figure it out. Sorry for the noise.
52 matches
Mail list logo
