Hello,
were running a few mailing lists with news gateway using postfix for the
MTA. So the setup is like this: postfix - mailman - innd
Now the problem is that sometimes mails exceeding the 1000 characters line
limit are handed over to postfix, which happily forwards them to mailman
which
Hi guys
My boss said me to know the statistics about use of webmail, exactly
which users used webmail during a week. Any of yours know how to make
it?
Im using Postfix + Dovecot + openldap + rouncube. If you need more
info please comment me.
Thanks!!
Markus Sch?pflin:
Hello,
were running a few mailing lists with news gateway using postfix for the
MTA. So the setup is like this: postfix - mailman - innd
Now the problem is that sometimes mails exceeding the 1000 characters line
limit are handed over to postfix, which happily forwards
On 12/16/2010 5:06 AM, deconya wrote:
Hi guys
My boss said me to know the statistics about use of webmail, exactly
which users used webmail during a week. Any of yours know how to make
it?
Im using Postfix + Dovecot + openldap + rouncube. If you need more
info please comment me.
Thanks!!
awstats will show stats from maillog or httpd log format. Not hard to
setup, creates pretty graphs. it will show dns names, but im not sure
if it will pull user info from logfiles.
Quoting Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
On 12/16/2010 5:06 AM, deconya wrote:
Hi guys
My boss said me
On 12/15/2010 03:24 AM, Razvan Chitu wrote:
Hello there,
The question here is a fairly simple one: given a simple postfix
mail server (primary mx), with local *nix user accounts, I want to
know the best way of implementing the following situation:
- Someone (a.k.a. the management)
Wietse Venema:
Victor Duchovni:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 01:37:48PM -0500, Dave Brodin wrote:
I ran the following command:
time /usr/local/bin/smtp-source -s 10 -l 10120 -m 500 -c \
-f t...@bluemarble.net -t dbro...@bluemarble.net localhost:25
OK, this is smtp-source with
This is a connection from google:
Dec 15 19:57:56 kahlo postfix/smtpd[11144]: connect from
mail-gw0-f44.google.com[74.125.83.44]
Dec 15 19:57:56 kahlo postfix/smtpd[11144]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mail-gw0-f44.google.com[74.125.83.44]: 550 5.1.1 rainexpec...@theo.to:
Recipient address
On tor 16 dec 2010 12:06:18 CET, deconya wrote
Im using Postfix + Dovecot + openldap + rouncube. If you need more
info please comment me.
grep 127.0.0.1 /var/log/maillog | grep 143 | sort -u | wc -l | mrtg.sh
:-)
maybe not perfect, but inspiration is free
--
xpoint
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:59:04 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
This is a connection from google:
Dec 15 19:57:56 kahlo postfix/smtpd[11144]: connect from
mail-gw0-f44.google.com[74.125.83.44] Dec 15 19:57:56 kahlo
postfix/smtpd[11144]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
Not unethical or compromising private data. If the information can be
sniffed unencrypted on the wire it is already compromised. Most email
administrators already have access to mail stores where the same data
is stored unencrypted. A company's mail server and storage is not for
personal use
On 12/16/2010 12:20 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
Not unethical or compromising private data. If the information can be
sniffed unencrypted on the wire it is already compromised. Most email
administrators already have access to mail stores where the same data
is stored unencrypted. A company's mail
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 02:01:31PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
The problem is that the SASL user name may well contain
white-space, and postmap(1) cannot create indexed tables with keys
that contain white-space. You could create the tables with other
tools, but then
How can a Postfix content filter tell whether the upstream client
authenticated or not?
I'm working on a content filter which should behave differently,
depending on whether the upstream client authenticated to Postfix or not
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:16:08AM -0800, Jack Bates wrote:
How can a Postfix content filter tell whether the upstream client
authenticated or not?
If the top-most Received header matches with (SMTP|ESMTPS?A?), the
ESMTPSA and ESMTPA cases correspond to an authenticated client,
with or without
Jack Bates:
How can a Postfix content filter tell whether the upstream client
authenticated or not?
I'm working on a content filter which should behave differently,
depending on whether the upstream client authenticated to Postfix or not
Set smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header = yes if the
Many thanks to Scott Lambert for what I believe to be the solution to my
load problem. It was nsswitch.conf which still had all its default
settings when I began this troubleshooting. I had changed all the
entries from nis to files when he mentioned it a few days ago. But he
then suggested
Dave Brodin:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Many thanks to Scott Lambert for what I believe to be the solution to my
load problem. It was nsswitch.conf which still had all its default
settings when I began this troubleshooting. I had changed all the
entries from nis to
On 12/16/2010 3:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Dave Brodin:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Many thanks to Scott Lambert for what I believe to be the solution to my
load problem. It was nsswitch.conf which still had all its default
settings when I began this troubleshooting. I
Noel Jones escribió:
On 12/15/2010 8:42 AM, Roger Durañona Vargas wrote:
Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jimenez escribió:
Hi, I'm not an expert on postfix but I think you have an issue with
your authentication.
Are you sure you are not sending emails with the same username and
password as the
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 03:00:39PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Dave Brodin:
Many thanks to Scott Lambert for what I believe to be the solution
to my load problem. It was nsswitch.conf which still had all its
default settings when I began this troubleshooting. I had changed
all the
Noel Jones:
You need to read and follow these directions:
http://www.postfix.org/SOHO_README.html#client_sasl_sender
Roger Dura?ona Vargas:
Seems that those directins dotn apply when we are talking about yahoo. I
got the same result, any additional account gets the 553 error when
sending.
Scott Lambert:
OK, before less-informed people start to spread urban legends, I did
all the measurements with the default nsswitch.conf file (see below)
which contains the exact same entries that were making your system
crawl.
So, while Postfix is now performing better for you, I am
Wietse Venema:
Noel Jones:
You need to read and follow these directions:
http://www.postfix.org/SOHO_README.html#client_sasl_sender
Roger Dura_ona Vargas:
Seems that those directins dotn apply when we are talking about yahoo. I
got the same result, any additional account gets the 553
Hi
Anybody have idea about| if [ grep '[][{!-]Spam[][?}].*'| nawk '{print
$1}' == 1 ] ...command works in .forward file ?
thanks.
/s
selcukyazar wrote:
Hi
my .forward manupulation works.
| sed -e 's/Subject:/Subject:FW: /g' -e '/'Received:\.\*'/{N;d}'|
/usr/sbin/sendmail
2010/12/17 selcukyazar selcuk.ya...@gmail.com:
Hi
Anybody have idea about | if [ grep '[][{!-]Spam[][?}].*'| nawk '{print
$1}' == 1 ] ... command works in .forward file ?
try procmail or maildrop ?
--
Eero
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:42:00PM +, Roger Dura?ona Vargas wrote:
I have set up sasl and a saslpass file with the first account:
smtp.correo.yahoo.es u...@yahoo.es:pass
This is wrong. The lookup key needs to be the sender address, and
you need to enable sender-specific SASL lookups, see
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 17:05:13 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Scott Lambert:
OK, before less-informed people start to spread urban legends, I did
all the measurements with the default nsswitch.conf file (see below)
which contains the exact same entries that were making your system
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 05:05:13PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Scott Lambert:
OK, before less-informed people start to spread urban legends, I did
all the measurements with the default nsswitch.conf file (see below)
which contains the exact same entries that were making your system
Hi,
I have a problem with aliases, and would like to make it work.
I have the following situation I have two servers one postfix v 2.0.18
and on the other (new one) v 2.6.5.
The problem is that I have migrated some users to the new server and set
up transport maps for them on the old server.
30 matches
Mail list logo
